- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00106028
Safety and Efficacy of Risedronate in the Treatment of Osteogenesis Imperfecta in Children
April 15, 2013 updated by: Warner Chilcott
Children with Osteogenesis Imperfecta (OI) have bone pain, low bone mass and fractures.
There are no approved drugs for the treatment of OI in children, even though some intravenous (IV) bisphosphonates are used off-label in some countries.
In a single dose, pharmacokinetic study, data showed that risedronate was well tolerated in 28 children with OI.
This three year study will test the safety and efficacy of risedronate in the treatment of children with OI.
For the first year, patients will be randomized to the risedronate and placebo groups in a 2:1 ratio.
For the second and third years of the study, all patients will receive risedronate.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
143
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Perth, Australia
- Princess Margaret Hospital for Children
-
-
New South Wales
-
Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
- The Children's Hospital at Westmead
-
-
-
-
-
Bruxelles, Belgium
- Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc
-
-
-
-
-
Santiago, Chile
- Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile
-
-
-
-
-
Plzen, Czech Republic
- Osteocentrum, II. Interní klinika, Fakultní nemocnice Plzeň-Bory
-
-
-
-
-
Helsinki, Finland
- Hospital for Children and Adolescents
-
-
-
-
-
Koln, Germany
- Klinikum und Poliklinik für Kinderheilkunde der Universität zu Köln
-
-
-
-
-
Budapest, Hungary
- 2nd Department of Pediatrics, Semmelwies University, Faculty of Medicine
-
-
-
-
-
Valeggio sul Mincio, Italy
- Rheumatologic Rehabilitation Unit of the University of Verona
-
-
-
-
-
Warzawa-Międzylesie, Poland
- Zaklad Biochemii i Medycyny Doswiadczalnej (Biochemisty Dept, Institute "Monument-Children Health Centre"
-
-
-
-
Gauteng
-
Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa
- Little Company of Mary Hospital
-
-
-
-
-
Barcelona, Spain
- Hospital Sant Joan de Deu
-
-
-
-
-
Bristol, United Kingdom
- Bristol Royal Hospital for Children,
-
Glasgow, United Kingdom, G3 8SJ
- Royal Hospital for Sick Children
-
Sheffield, United Kingdom, S210 2TH
- Sheffield Children's Hospital
-
-
-
-
Florida
-
Miami, Florida, United States, 33155
- Miami Children's Hospital
-
-
Nebraska
-
Omaha, Nebraska, United States, 68114
- University of Nebraska Medical Center, Children's Hospital
-
-
New York
-
New York, New York, United States, 10021
- Hospital for Special Surgery
-
-
Ohio
-
Dayton, Ohio, United States, 45409
- Wright State University BioMedical Imaging Laboratory and Miami Valley Hospital
-
-
Oregon
-
Portland, Oregon, United States, 97239
- Oregon Health & Science University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
4 years to 15 years (Child)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- OI diagnosis
- increased risk of fracture: either has a history of at least 1 radiographically confirmed, non-traumatic or low impact fracture plus low bone mineral density (BMD) or has very low BMD with or without a history of fractures.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Any bisphosphonate use within one year of enrollment
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo Daily
placebo tablet, once a day for one year then for two years open label risedronate
|
placebo tablet once a day for one year followed by risedronate once a day for two years
|
Experimental: Risedronate Daily
risedronate tablet, once a day for one year then for two years open label risedronate once a day
|
risedronate tablet once a day for one year followed by risedronate once a day for two years
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Percent Change From Baseline Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Month 12, ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 12
|
Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD) measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA)and read by central reader.
Duplicate scans obtained at screening and Month 12.
|
Baseline and Month 12
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Percent Change From Baseline Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Month 24, ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 24
|
Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD) measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA)and read by central reader.
|
Baseline and Month 24
|
Percent Change From Baseline Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Month 36, ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 36
|
Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD) measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA)and read by central reader.
|
Baseline and Month 36
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Body BMD at Month 12, ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 12
|
Percent Change from baseline in Total Body Bone Mineral Density (BMD) measured by DXA.
|
Baseline and Month 12
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Body BMD at Month 24, ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 24
|
Percent Change from baseline in Total Body Bone Mineral Density (BMD) measured by DXA.
|
Baseline and Month 24
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Body BMD at Month 36, ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 36
|
Percent Change from baseline in Total Body Bone Mineral Density (BMD) measured by DXA.
|
Baseline and Month 36
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine BMC (Bone Mineral Content) at Month 12, ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 12
|
Baseline and Month 12
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine BMC (Bone Mineral Content) at Month 24, ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 24
|
Baseline and Month 24
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine BMC (Bone Mineral Content) at Month 36, ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 36
|
Baseline and Month 36
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Body BMC at Month 12, ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 12
|
Baseline and Month 12
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Body BMC at Month 24, ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 24
|
Baseline and Month 24
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Body BMC at Month 36, ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 36
|
Baseline and Month 36
|
|
Lumbar Spine Z-score - Percent Change From Baseline to Month 12, ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 12
|
Lumbar Spine Z-score - number of standard deviations a patient's BMD differs from the average BMD of their age, sex, and ethnicity.
Positive scores indicate BMD above the mean; Positive values are "best values" and negative values are "worst values".
|
Baseline and Month 12
|
Lumbar Spine Z-score - Percent Change From Baseline to Month 24, ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 24
|
Lumbar Spine Z-score - number of standard deviations a patient's BMD differs from the average BMD of their age, sex, and ethnicity.
Positive scores indicate BMD above the mean; Positive values are "best values" and negative values are "worst values".
|
Baseline and Month 24
|
Lumbar Spine Z-score - Percent Change From Baseline to Month 36, ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 36
|
Lumbar Spine Z-score - number of standard deviations a patient's BMD differs from the average BMD of their age, sex, and ethnicity.
Positive scores indicate BMD above the mean; Positive values are "best values" and negative values are "worst values".
|
Baseline and Month 36
|
Total Body Z-score- Percent Change From Baseline to Month 12, ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 12
|
Total Body Z-score - number of standard deviations a patient's BMD differs from the average BMD of their age, sex, and ethnicity.
Positive scores indicate BMD above the mean; Positive values are "best values" and negative values are "worst values".
|
Baseline and Month 12
|
Total Body Z-score- Percent Change From Baseline to Month 24, ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 24
|
Total Body Z-score - number of standard deviations a patient's BMD differs from the average BMD of their age, sex, and ethnicity.
Positive scores indicate BMD above the mean; Positive values are "best values" and negative values are "worst values".
|
Baseline and Month 24
|
Total Body Z-score- Percent Change From Baseline to Month 36, ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 36
|
Total Body Z-score - number of standard deviations a patient's BMD differs from the average BMD of their age, sex, and ethnicity.
Positive scores indicate BMD above the mean; Positive values are "best values" and negative values are "worst values".
|
Baseline and Month 36
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Area at Month 12, ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 12
|
Measured by DXA.
|
Baseline and Month 12
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Area at Month 24, ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 24
|
Measured by DXA.
|
Baseline and Month 24
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Area at Month 36, ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 36
|
Measured by DXA.
|
Baseline and Month 36
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Body Bone Area Month 12, ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 12
|
Baseline and Month 12
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Body Bone Area Month 24, ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 24
|
Baseline and Month 24
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Body Bone Area Month 36, ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 36
|
Baseline and Month 36
|
|
New Morphometric Vertebral Fracture at Month 12, ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 12
|
Morphometric Vertebral Fracture measured by semi-quantitative (SQ) analysis of x-rays using the Genant scoring system at endpoint.
(Ref: Genant 1993).
SQ-Scores range from 0 (no fracture) to 3 (severe fracture).
New fracture = SQ score is 0 at baseline and >0 at the specified end visit.
|
Baseline and Month 12
|
New Morphometric Vertebral Fracture at Month 36, ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 36
|
Morphometric Vertebral Fracture measured by SQ analysis of x-rays using the Genant scoring system.
(Ref: Genant 1993).
SQ-Scores range from 0 (no fracture) to 3 (severe fracture).
New fracture = SQ score is 0 at baseline and >0 at the specified end visit.
|
Baseline and Month 36
|
Categorization by Number of New Morphometric Vertebral Fracture at Month 12, ITT
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 12
|
Patients with 1 or more New Morphometric Vertebral Fracture as measured by SQ analysis of x-rays using the Genant scoring system (Ref: Genant 1993).
SQ-Scores range from 0 (no fracture) to 3 (severe fracture).
Incidence = SQ score is 0 at baseline and >0 at post-baseline.
|
Baseline and Month 12
|
Categorization by Number of New Morphometric Vertebral Fracture at Month 36, ITT
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 36
|
Patients with 1 or more New Morphometric Vertebral Fracture as measured by SQ analysis of x-rays using the Genant scoring system (Ref: Genant 1993).
SQ-Scores range from 0 (no fracture) to 3 (severe fracture).
Incidence = SQ score is 0 at baseline and >0 at post-baseline.
|
Baseline and Month 36
|
Incidence New Vertebral Fractures by SQ (Semi-Quantitative) Score, Patients Aged 4-9 Years, Month 12, ITT Population
Time Frame: Month 12
|
Patients aged 4-9 years with new morphometric vertebral fractures as measured by SQ analysis of x-rays using the Genant scoring system at Month 12 +/- 14 days.
(Ref: Genant 1993).
SQ Score mild - 0/no fracture to Grade 1, Moderate to Severe - change from 0/no fracture to Grade 2-3.
|
Month 12
|
Incidence New Vertebral Fractures by SQ Score, Patients Aged 10-15 Years, Month 12, ITT Population
Time Frame: Month 12
|
Patients aged 10-15 years with new morphometric vertebral fractures as measured by SQ analysis of x-rays using the Genant scoring system at Month 12 +/- 14 days.
(Ref: Genant 1993).
SQ Score mild - 0/no fracture to Grade 1, Moderate to Severe - change from 0/no fracture to Grade 2-3.
|
Month 12
|
Probability of Fracture in 12 Months (Kaplan-Meier Cumulative Incidence), ITT Population
Time Frame: Time to First Event (days) up to 12 Months
|
Long bones include radius, ulna, humerus, tibia, fibula, femur, upper limb and lower limb fracture.
|
Time to First Event (days) up to 12 Months
|
Number of Clinical Fractures, Month 12, ITT Population
Time Frame: 12 Months
|
Long bones include radius, ulna, humerus, tibia, fibula, femur, upper limb and lower limb fracture.
|
12 Months
|
Serum BAP - Percent Change From Baseline to Month 12, ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 Months
|
Serum Bone Alkaline Phosphatase (BAP - bone formation marker).
Negative percent changes indicate response to treatment.
|
Baseline and 12 Months
|
Serum BAP - Percent Change From Baseline to Month 24, ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline and 24 Months
|
Serum Bone Alkaline Phosphatase (BAP - bone formation marker).
Negative percent changes indicate response to treatment.
|
Baseline and 24 Months
|
Serum BAP - Percent Change From Baseline to Month 36, ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline and 36 Months
|
Serum Bone Alkaline Phosphatase (BAP - bone formation marker).
Negative percent changes indicate response to treatment.
|
Baseline and 36 Months
|
Urine NTX/Cr - Percent Change From Baseline at Month 12, ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline and Endpoint / Month 12
|
Urine type-I collagen N-telopeptide/creatinine (NTX/Cr; bone resorption marker).
Negative percent changes indicate response to treatment.
|
Baseline and Endpoint / Month 12
|
Urine NTX/Cr - Percent Change From Baseline at Month 24, ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 24
|
Urine type-I collagen N-telopeptide/creatinine (NTX/Cr; bone resorption marker).
Negative percent changes indicate response to treatment.
|
Baseline and Month 24
|
Urine NTX/Cr - Percent Change From Baseline at Month 36, ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 36
|
Urine type-I collagen N-telopeptide/creatinine (NTX/Cr; bone resorption marker).
Negative percent changes indicate response to treatment.
|
Baseline and Month 36
|
Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale - Change From Baseline to Month 12, ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 12
|
Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale (pain assessment scale using facial expressions, translated into a range from 0= no pain [smiling face] to 10= worst pain possible [distorted face with tears]; negative values indicate decrease in pain).
Reference: Wong DL et al.
|
Baseline and Month 12
|
Bone Age (Years), Change From Baseline to Month 12, ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 12
|
Bone Age determined by visual assessment of hand / wrist radiographs.
|
Baseline and Month 12
|
Bone Age (Years), Change From Baseline to Month 24, ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 24
|
Bone Age determined by visual assessment of hand / wrist radiographs.
|
Baseline and Month 24
|
Bone Age (Years), Change From Baseline to Month 36, ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 36
|
Bone Age determined by visual assessment of hand / wrist radiographs.
|
Baseline and Month 36
|
Annualized Growth Velocity - Change From Baseline to Month 12, ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 12
|
Annualized Growth Velocity [= bone age change from baseline x (365.25/time in days between baseline and the bone age measurement)]
|
Baseline and Month 12
|
Annualized Growth Velocity - Change From Baseline to Month 36, ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 36
|
Annualized Growth Velocity [= bone age change from baseline x (365.25/time in days between baseline and the bone age measurement)]
|
Baseline and Month 36
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Director: Dietrich H Wenderoth, MD, Procter and Gamble
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
November 1, 2004
Primary Completion (Actual)
April 1, 2008
Study Completion (Actual)
March 1, 2010
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
March 18, 2005
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 18, 2005
First Posted (Estimate)
March 21, 2005
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
April 22, 2013
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 15, 2013
Last Verified
April 1, 2013
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Genetic Diseases, Inborn
- Musculoskeletal Diseases
- Connective Tissue Diseases
- Bone Diseases
- Bone Diseases, Developmental
- Osteochondrodysplasias
- Collagen Diseases
- Osteogenesis Imperfecta
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Membrane Transport Modulators
- Bone Density Conservation Agents
- Calcium-Regulating Hormones and Agents
- Calcium Channel Blockers
- Risedronic Acid
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2003100
- HMR4003I/3001
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Osteogenesis Imperfecta
-
Nationwide Children's HospitalCompletedOsteogenesis Imperfecta Type III | Osteogenesis Imperfecta Type IIUnited States
-
Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical IncMereo BioPharmaCompletedOsteogenesis Imperfecta Type III | Osteogenesis Imperfecta Type IV | Osteogenesis Imperfecta, Type IUnited States, Canada, Denmark, France, United Kingdom
-
Emory UniversityNot yet recruitingOsteogenesis Imperfecta | Osteogenesis Imperfecta Type III
-
Novartis PharmaceuticalsCompletedOsteogenesis ImperfectaUnited States
-
Shriners Hospitals for ChildrenNovartisCompleted
-
AmgenTerminatedOsteogenesis Imperfecta (OI)Canada, Czechia, Spain, United Kingdom, United States, Italy, Hungary, Australia, Belgium, France, Germany, Poland
-
Istituto Ortopedico RizzoliRecruitingOsteogenesis ImperfectaItaly
-
Baylor College of MedicineRecruiting
-
SanofiRecruitingOsteogenesis ImperfectaUnited States, Australia, Canada, France
-
Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical IncMereo BioPharmaRecruitingOsteogenesis ImperfectaUnited States, Canada, Turkey, Argentina, Germany, Australia, Italy, Portugal, United Kingdom, Poland, France, Netherlands
Clinical Trials on Placebo
-
SamA Pharmaceutical Co., LtdUnknownAcute Bronchitis | Acute Upper Respiratory Tract InfectionKorea, Republic of
-
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)CompletedCannabis UseUnited States
-
AstraZenecaParexel; Spandauer Damm 130; 14050; Berlin, GermanyCompletedMale Subjects With Type II Diabetes (T2DM)Germany
-
Heptares Therapeutics LimitedCompletedPharmacokinetics | Safety IssuesUnited Kingdom
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompletedPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveUnited Kingdom, Netherlands
-
ItalfarmacoCompletedBecker Muscular DystrophyNetherlands, Italy
-
Shijiazhuang Yiling Pharmaceutical Co. LtdXuanwu Hospital, BeijingCompleted
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompletedInfections, BacterialUnited States
-
West Penn Allegheny Health SystemCompletedAsthma | Allergic RhinitisUnited States