Safety and Efficacy of Risedronate in the Treatment of Osteogenesis Imperfecta in Children

April 15, 2013 updated by: Warner Chilcott
Children with Osteogenesis Imperfecta (OI) have bone pain, low bone mass and fractures. There are no approved drugs for the treatment of OI in children, even though some intravenous (IV) bisphosphonates are used off-label in some countries. In a single dose, pharmacokinetic study, data showed that risedronate was well tolerated in 28 children with OI. This three year study will test the safety and efficacy of risedronate in the treatment of children with OI. For the first year, patients will be randomized to the risedronate and placebo groups in a 2:1 ratio. For the second and third years of the study, all patients will receive risedronate.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

143

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Perth, Australia
        • Princess Margaret Hospital for Children
    • New South Wales
      • Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
        • The Children's Hospital at Westmead
      • Bruxelles, Belgium
        • Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc
      • Santiago, Chile
        • Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile
      • Plzen, Czech Republic
        • Osteocentrum, II. Interní klinika, Fakultní nemocnice Plzeň-Bory
      • Helsinki, Finland
        • Hospital for Children and Adolescents
      • Koln, Germany
        • Klinikum und Poliklinik für Kinderheilkunde der Universität zu Köln
      • Budapest, Hungary
        • 2nd Department of Pediatrics, Semmelwies University, Faculty of Medicine
      • Valeggio sul Mincio, Italy
        • Rheumatologic Rehabilitation Unit of the University of Verona
      • Warzawa-Międzylesie, Poland
        • Zaklad Biochemii i Medycyny Doswiadczalnej (Biochemisty Dept, Institute "Monument-Children Health Centre"
    • Gauteng
      • Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa
        • Little Company of Mary Hospital
      • Barcelona, Spain
        • Hospital Sant Joan de Deu
      • Bristol, United Kingdom
        • Bristol Royal Hospital for Children,
      • Glasgow, United Kingdom, G3 8SJ
        • Royal Hospital for Sick Children
      • Sheffield, United Kingdom, S210 2TH
        • Sheffield Children's Hospital
    • Florida
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33155
        • Miami Children's Hospital
    • Nebraska
      • Omaha, Nebraska, United States, 68114
        • University of Nebraska Medical Center, Children's Hospital
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10021
        • Hospital for Special Surgery
    • Ohio
      • Dayton, Ohio, United States, 45409
        • Wright State University BioMedical Imaging Laboratory and Miami Valley Hospital
    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97239
        • Oregon Health & Science University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

4 years to 15 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • OI diagnosis
  • increased risk of fracture: either has a history of at least 1 radiographically confirmed, non-traumatic or low impact fracture plus low bone mineral density (BMD) or has very low BMD with or without a history of fractures.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any bisphosphonate use within one year of enrollment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo Daily
placebo tablet, once a day for one year then for two years open label risedronate
placebo tablet once a day for one year followed by risedronate once a day for two years
Experimental: Risedronate Daily
risedronate tablet, once a day for one year then for two years open label risedronate once a day
risedronate tablet once a day for one year followed by risedronate once a day for two years

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percent Change From Baseline Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Month 12, ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 12
Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD) measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA)and read by central reader. Duplicate scans obtained at screening and Month 12.
Baseline and Month 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percent Change From Baseline Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Month 24, ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 24
Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD) measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA)and read by central reader.
Baseline and Month 24
Percent Change From Baseline Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Month 36, ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 36
Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD) measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA)and read by central reader.
Baseline and Month 36
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Body BMD at Month 12, ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 12
Percent Change from baseline in Total Body Bone Mineral Density (BMD) measured by DXA.
Baseline and Month 12
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Body BMD at Month 24, ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 24
Percent Change from baseline in Total Body Bone Mineral Density (BMD) measured by DXA.
Baseline and Month 24
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Body BMD at Month 36, ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 36
Percent Change from baseline in Total Body Bone Mineral Density (BMD) measured by DXA.
Baseline and Month 36
Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine BMC (Bone Mineral Content) at Month 12, ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 12
Baseline and Month 12
Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine BMC (Bone Mineral Content) at Month 24, ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 24
Baseline and Month 24
Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine BMC (Bone Mineral Content) at Month 36, ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 36
Baseline and Month 36
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Body BMC at Month 12, ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 12
Baseline and Month 12
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Body BMC at Month 24, ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 24
Baseline and Month 24
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Body BMC at Month 36, ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 36
Baseline and Month 36
Lumbar Spine Z-score - Percent Change From Baseline to Month 12, ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 12
Lumbar Spine Z-score - number of standard deviations a patient's BMD differs from the average BMD of their age, sex, and ethnicity. Positive scores indicate BMD above the mean; Positive values are "best values" and negative values are "worst values".
Baseline and Month 12
Lumbar Spine Z-score - Percent Change From Baseline to Month 24, ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 24
Lumbar Spine Z-score - number of standard deviations a patient's BMD differs from the average BMD of their age, sex, and ethnicity. Positive scores indicate BMD above the mean; Positive values are "best values" and negative values are "worst values".
Baseline and Month 24
Lumbar Spine Z-score - Percent Change From Baseline to Month 36, ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 36
Lumbar Spine Z-score - number of standard deviations a patient's BMD differs from the average BMD of their age, sex, and ethnicity. Positive scores indicate BMD above the mean; Positive values are "best values" and negative values are "worst values".
Baseline and Month 36
Total Body Z-score- Percent Change From Baseline to Month 12, ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 12
Total Body Z-score - number of standard deviations a patient's BMD differs from the average BMD of their age, sex, and ethnicity. Positive scores indicate BMD above the mean; Positive values are "best values" and negative values are "worst values".
Baseline and Month 12
Total Body Z-score- Percent Change From Baseline to Month 24, ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 24
Total Body Z-score - number of standard deviations a patient's BMD differs from the average BMD of their age, sex, and ethnicity. Positive scores indicate BMD above the mean; Positive values are "best values" and negative values are "worst values".
Baseline and Month 24
Total Body Z-score- Percent Change From Baseline to Month 36, ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 36
Total Body Z-score - number of standard deviations a patient's BMD differs from the average BMD of their age, sex, and ethnicity. Positive scores indicate BMD above the mean; Positive values are "best values" and negative values are "worst values".
Baseline and Month 36
Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Area at Month 12, ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 12
Measured by DXA.
Baseline and Month 12
Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Area at Month 24, ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 24
Measured by DXA.
Baseline and Month 24
Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Area at Month 36, ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 36
Measured by DXA.
Baseline and Month 36
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Body Bone Area Month 12, ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 12
Baseline and Month 12
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Body Bone Area Month 24, ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 24
Baseline and Month 24
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Body Bone Area Month 36, ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 36
Baseline and Month 36
New Morphometric Vertebral Fracture at Month 12, ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 12
Morphometric Vertebral Fracture measured by semi-quantitative (SQ) analysis of x-rays using the Genant scoring system at endpoint. (Ref: Genant 1993). SQ-Scores range from 0 (no fracture) to 3 (severe fracture). New fracture = SQ score is 0 at baseline and >0 at the specified end visit.
Baseline and Month 12
New Morphometric Vertebral Fracture at Month 36, ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 36
Morphometric Vertebral Fracture measured by SQ analysis of x-rays using the Genant scoring system. (Ref: Genant 1993). SQ-Scores range from 0 (no fracture) to 3 (severe fracture). New fracture = SQ score is 0 at baseline and >0 at the specified end visit.
Baseline and Month 36
Categorization by Number of New Morphometric Vertebral Fracture at Month 12, ITT
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 12
Patients with 1 or more New Morphometric Vertebral Fracture as measured by SQ analysis of x-rays using the Genant scoring system (Ref: Genant 1993). SQ-Scores range from 0 (no fracture) to 3 (severe fracture). Incidence = SQ score is 0 at baseline and >0 at post-baseline.
Baseline and Month 12
Categorization by Number of New Morphometric Vertebral Fracture at Month 36, ITT
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 36
Patients with 1 or more New Morphometric Vertebral Fracture as measured by SQ analysis of x-rays using the Genant scoring system (Ref: Genant 1993). SQ-Scores range from 0 (no fracture) to 3 (severe fracture). Incidence = SQ score is 0 at baseline and >0 at post-baseline.
Baseline and Month 36
Incidence New Vertebral Fractures by SQ (Semi-Quantitative) Score, Patients Aged 4-9 Years, Month 12, ITT Population
Time Frame: Month 12
Patients aged 4-9 years with new morphometric vertebral fractures as measured by SQ analysis of x-rays using the Genant scoring system at Month 12 +/- 14 days. (Ref: Genant 1993). SQ Score mild - 0/no fracture to Grade 1, Moderate to Severe - change from 0/no fracture to Grade 2-3.
Month 12
Incidence New Vertebral Fractures by SQ Score, Patients Aged 10-15 Years, Month 12, ITT Population
Time Frame: Month 12
Patients aged 10-15 years with new morphometric vertebral fractures as measured by SQ analysis of x-rays using the Genant scoring system at Month 12 +/- 14 days. (Ref: Genant 1993). SQ Score mild - 0/no fracture to Grade 1, Moderate to Severe - change from 0/no fracture to Grade 2-3.
Month 12
Probability of Fracture in 12 Months (Kaplan-Meier Cumulative Incidence), ITT Population
Time Frame: Time to First Event (days) up to 12 Months
Long bones include radius, ulna, humerus, tibia, fibula, femur, upper limb and lower limb fracture.
Time to First Event (days) up to 12 Months
Number of Clinical Fractures, Month 12, ITT Population
Time Frame: 12 Months
Long bones include radius, ulna, humerus, tibia, fibula, femur, upper limb and lower limb fracture.
12 Months
Serum BAP - Percent Change From Baseline to Month 12, ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 Months
Serum Bone Alkaline Phosphatase (BAP - bone formation marker). Negative percent changes indicate response to treatment.
Baseline and 12 Months
Serum BAP - Percent Change From Baseline to Month 24, ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline and 24 Months
Serum Bone Alkaline Phosphatase (BAP - bone formation marker). Negative percent changes indicate response to treatment.
Baseline and 24 Months
Serum BAP - Percent Change From Baseline to Month 36, ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline and 36 Months
Serum Bone Alkaline Phosphatase (BAP - bone formation marker). Negative percent changes indicate response to treatment.
Baseline and 36 Months
Urine NTX/Cr - Percent Change From Baseline at Month 12, ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline and Endpoint / Month 12
Urine type-I collagen N-telopeptide/creatinine (NTX/Cr; bone resorption marker). Negative percent changes indicate response to treatment.
Baseline and Endpoint / Month 12
Urine NTX/Cr - Percent Change From Baseline at Month 24, ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 24
Urine type-I collagen N-telopeptide/creatinine (NTX/Cr; bone resorption marker). Negative percent changes indicate response to treatment.
Baseline and Month 24
Urine NTX/Cr - Percent Change From Baseline at Month 36, ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 36
Urine type-I collagen N-telopeptide/creatinine (NTX/Cr; bone resorption marker). Negative percent changes indicate response to treatment.
Baseline and Month 36
Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale - Change From Baseline to Month 12, ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 12
Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale (pain assessment scale using facial expressions, translated into a range from 0= no pain [smiling face] to 10= worst pain possible [distorted face with tears]; negative values indicate decrease in pain). Reference: Wong DL et al.
Baseline and Month 12
Bone Age (Years), Change From Baseline to Month 12, ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 12
Bone Age determined by visual assessment of hand / wrist radiographs.
Baseline and Month 12
Bone Age (Years), Change From Baseline to Month 24, ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 24
Bone Age determined by visual assessment of hand / wrist radiographs.
Baseline and Month 24
Bone Age (Years), Change From Baseline to Month 36, ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 36
Bone Age determined by visual assessment of hand / wrist radiographs.
Baseline and Month 36
Annualized Growth Velocity - Change From Baseline to Month 12, ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 12
Annualized Growth Velocity [= bone age change from baseline x (365.25/time in days between baseline and the bone age measurement)]
Baseline and Month 12
Annualized Growth Velocity - Change From Baseline to Month 36, ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 36
Annualized Growth Velocity [= bone age change from baseline x (365.25/time in days between baseline and the bone age measurement)]
Baseline and Month 36

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Dietrich H Wenderoth, MD, Procter and Gamble

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2004

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 18, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 18, 2005

First Posted (Estimate)

March 21, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 22, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 15, 2013

Last Verified

April 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteogenesis Imperfecta

Clinical Trials on Placebo

3
Subscribe