Motivating HIV+ Women: Risk Reduction and ART Adherence (KHARMA)

September 13, 2013 updated by: Marcia McDonnell Holstad, DSN, FNP-BC, Emory University
The purpose of this study is to determine if a group motivational interviewing based intervention will increase adherence to antiretroviral medications and use of risk reduction behaviors.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Women are the fastest growing group of persons with AIDS. They are often diagnosed later in the disease, when antiretroviral therapy (ART) is strongly indicated. Currently ART involves the use of multiple medications that must be taken under strict conditions at regular time intervals up to as many as 4 different times a day. Some medications must be taken on an empty stomach, some with high fat food, some with low fat food, and all of these must be coordinated throughout the day. It is extremely important for patients to take ART exactly as prescribed and not miss any doses in order to reduce the amount of HIV virus in the bloodstream, increase the CD4 cell counts, prevent the serious consequences of AIDS, hospitalizations, and development of drug resistant strains. These regimen-related problems and the high care-taking burden placed on HIV+ women for their children and partners make near perfect adherence difficult to achieve. And, as women on ART begin to feel better and resume their normal activities, including sexual activities, adherence to behaviors that contribute to reducing the risk of spreading HIV (RRB), such as condom use and safe needle use in injection drug users becomes crucial. Researches have shown that only about 11% to 63% of HIV+ women use condoms consistently.

The primary purpose of this randomized controlled behavioral trial is to test the effect of a nurse led group motivational intervention for HIV+ women on adherence to ART and RRB. The secondary purpose is to examine the mediator effect of 3 variables that have been shown to be important in behavior change: self-efficacy, outcome expectancy, and personal goals. The Motivational Group + Usual Care (MG+UC) intervention builds on the usual care provided at the agencies and has Motivational Interviewing (MI) as a central component. It consists of 8 90 minute sessions, 1 week apart, led by a specially trained nurse, to motivate women to adhere to both ART and RRB. The intervention will be compared to an 8 session health promotion program (HPP+UC) that is led by a nurse health educator. These sessions will focus on nutrition, exercise, stress management, and women's health issues. These sessions will also be 90 minutes in length and meet weekly for 8 weeks. Both groups will receive beauty and pampering incentives such as beauty makeovers, skin care instruction, and massages after several of the sessions, as well as child care, transportation tokens, and monetary incentives of $10 for attendance at each of the first 4 groups and $15 for attendance at each of the last 4 groups. Snacks appropriate for ART and immune status will be supplied to the MG+UC group, and fruits, vegetables, and other nutritious snacks will be provided to the HPP+UC group. Groups will be held at AID Atlanta, the Infectious Disease Program of the Grady Health System, and at the Infectious Disease Clinic of Emory Crawford Long.

In order to be eligible to participate, the women must be HIV+, over 18 years of age, be on a new or different ART or have self-reported nonadherence to her current ART regimen, speak and understand English, and be mentally stable as determined by a screening assessment. All participants will complete a baseline assessment, and follow-up assessments immediately, 3, 6, and 9 months after the end of the group. Participants will be paid $25 for each assessment. We expect 300 women to be randomized and participate; pregnant women will not be excluded.

We hypothesize that the women who are randomized to the MG+UC group, will, on the immediate, 3, 6, and 9 month follow-up assessments have higher mean adherence rates to ART, report more frequent use of RRB, have higher CD4 counts, and lower mean viral loads than those randomized to the HPP+UC group. We also hypothesize that the effects of the intervention on adherence to ART and RRB will be brought about by higher mean levels of self-efficacy, more positive expected outcomes, and more specific and effective personal goals.

As noted above, MI forms the basis for the intervention. MI is a client-focused method of counseling used to help clients deal with ambivalence about changing behavior. MI principles include expressing empathy, developing discrepancy, rolling resistance, and supporting self-efficacy. It has been used primarily with individuals, but some MI groups have been described with substance users. Our application in a group format with HIV+ women is new and innovative.

All participants will receive the usual care plus either the Health Promotion Program or the Motivational Interviewing Intervention. How the usual care is administered varies by agency but in general for ART consists of prescription of new or different ART regimen based on established clinical criteria and guidelines by the Panel on Clinical Practices for Treatment of HIV infection, education about the medications (including actions, side effects, special requirements), setting up the medication schedule, and follow-up regarding medication taking. The usual RRB education includes information about risk reduction practices such as condom use, sexual practices, needle cleansing, and needle sharing. Depending on the agency, the usual care may be formalized and administered by health care providers, nurses, social workers, and/or health educators.

This innovative project is designed to promote adherence to both ART and RRB, something that has not been described so far in the literature. Adherence to ART promotes health and reduces infectiousness, including transmission of HIV from mother to fetus. Adherence to RRB reduces the spread of HIV. Thus, if effective, the intervention will promote health of HIV+ women and reduce the spread of HIV.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

207

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30322
        • Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Infected with HIV
  • Be on a new or different antiretroviral medication regimen or self report non-adherence to antiretroviral medications
  • Must be 18 years of age or older
  • Female by birth
  • Understand and speak English
  • Be willing to complete a screening interview to further determine if you are able to take part in the study
  • Be willing to follow study requirements and use a MEMS cap on one of your antiretroviral meds

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Under 18 years of age
  • Transgender
  • Males
  • HIV negative
  • Do not understand or speak English
  • Do not achieve a satisfactory score on the screening interview
  • Diagnosed as actively psychotic, severely depressed, or pose a risk of harm to themselves or others since these women may not be emotionally capable of sitting through lengthy, potentially emotional group or assessment sessions, or may be disruptive to other participants

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Motivational group
Group counseling using motivational interviewing
Motivational interviewing in group format

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adherence to antiretroviral therapy
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 weeks, 3, 6, 9 months post intervention
Self report questionnaires, Electronic drug monitoring caps (MEMS)
Baseline, 2 weeks, 3, 6, 9 months post intervention
Use of Risk Reduction Behaviors
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 weeks, 3, 6, 9 months post intervention
Questionnaires about risky sexual behaviors, and substance use behaviors
Baseline, 2 weeks, 3, 6, 9 months post intervention
Clinical indicators
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 weeks, 3, 6, 9 months post intervention
CD4 and HIV viral load lab results from medical records
Baseline, 2 weeks, 3, 6, 9 months post intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Self-Efficacy
Time Frame: Baseline, Immediate post follow-up, 3, 6, 9 months post intervention
Baseline, Immediate post follow-up, 3, 6, 9 months post intervention
Outcome Expectancy
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 weeks, 3, 6, 9 months post intervention
Baseline, 2 weeks, 3, 6, 9 months post intervention
Personal Goals
Time Frame: Immediate post follow-up, 3, 6, and 9 months post intervention
Immediate post follow-up, 3, 6, and 9 months post intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Marcia McDonnell-Holstad, DSN,RN-C,FNP, Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University
  • Study Director: Bridget F. Jones, RN,MSN,BSEd, Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2004

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 14, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 14, 2005

First Posted (Estimate)

November 15, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 17, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 13, 2013

Last Verified

September 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IRB00045905
  • 1R01NR008094-01A1 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HIV

Clinical Trials on Motivational groups

3
Subscribe