Conformal Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Metastatic Cancer Outside the Brain

November 16, 2016 updated by: Deborah Citrin, M.D., National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (CC)

A Phase II Study of Hypofractionated Highly Conformal Radiation With Helical Tomotherapy for Extra-Cranial Oligo

RATIONALE: Specialized radiation therapy that delivers a high dose of radiation directly to the tumor may kill more tumor cells and cause less damage to normal tissue.

PURPOSE: This phase II trial is studying how well conformal radiation therapy works in treating patients with metastatic cancer outside the brain.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

OBJECTIVES:

Primary

  • To evaluate local control (defined as absence of local progression) at all treated sites of metastatic disease in patients with extracranial oligometastases treated with ablative doses of highly conformal radiotherapy delivered with helical tomotherapy.
  • To evaluate local control at each treated site of metastatic disease in these patients.

Secondary

  • To determine median time to local progression in patients treated with this regimen.
  • To evaluate interfraction and intrafraction motion with megavoltage computed tomography (CT) imaging based on site of metastasis in these patients.
  • To compare tumor growth during systemic therapy in tumors treated with targeted radiotherapy vs newly developed tumors that have not been treated with radiotherapy.
  • To evaluate if treatment with hypofractionated highly conformal radiotherapy with helical tomotherapy can improve pain scores and decrease the need for analgesia in these patients.

OUTLINE: Patients are stratified according to histology (renal cell carcinoma vs melanoma vs sarcoma vs other histologies).

Patients undergo hypofractionated highly conformal radiotherapy with helical tomotherapy once every other day over 5 days for a total of 3 fractions. Patients undergo megavoltage imaging before and after each fraction to verify the positioning of each target lesion.

Patients complete a pain assessment questionnaire at baseline and at 1 and 3 months after treatment.

After completion of study therapy, patients are followed at 1 and 3 months and then every 3 months for up to 1 year.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Maryland
      • Bethesda, Maryland, United States, 20892-1182
        • Warren Grant Magnuson Clinical Center - NCI Clinical Trials Referral Office

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

  • Pathologically confirmed cancer

    • No active disease at the primary site as assessed by physical examination, clinical evaluation, or site-specific imaging
  • Measurable metastatic disease meeting the following criteria:

    • Four or fewer sites of extracranial lesions < 5 cm in size
    • If metastatic site(s) is within the lung, the following criteria must be met:

      • No more than two metastases in the proximal bronchial tree area (defined as 2 cm from the trachea or mainstem bronchi)
      • Carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (DLCO) > 30% predicted and forced expiratory volume 1 (FEV1) > 1.2 L (in patients with more than one metastatic site in the lungs)
    • If metastatic site(s) is within 2 cm of either kidney, creatinine level must be < 1.5 times upper limit of normal (ULN)
    • If metastatic site(s) is within 2 cm of the liver, bilirubin level must be < 1.5 times ULN
  • Patients with metastatic disease that meets any of the following criteria are excluded:

    • Proposed site(s) of treatment has been previously treated with radiotherapy
    • Metastatic site(s) requires emergent treatment (e.g., spinal cord compression, cauda equina, airway compromise, or life-threatening end-organ dysfunction)
    • Disease that is untreated or previously treated and progressive in the brain
    • Pathologic fracture or impending pathologic fracture at the metastatic site
    • Metastatic site(s) of a disease histology that is known to be sensitive to low doses of radiotherapy (e.g., pure seminoma, lymphoma, or small cell carcinoma)
  • Patients in whom surgery is deemed an appropriate option as standard of care (e.g., isolated lung metastasis from sarcoma or isolated liver metastasis from colon cancer) but who refuse surgical therapy are eligible

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-2
  • Life expectancy > 12 weeks as assessed by the consulting radiation oncologist
  • Not pregnant or nursing
  • Negative pregnancy test
  • Fertile patients must use effective contraception
  • No history of lupus erythematosus or scleroderma
  • No known hypersensitivity to therapeutic radiotherapy
  • No other malignancy within the past 2 years except nonmelanoma skin cancer or in situ malignancies of the cervix, bladder, or head and neck
  • No unrelated systemic illness that, in the judgment of the investigator, would compromise the patient's ability to tolerate study therapy or would likely interfere with study procedures or results
  • Able or likely to adhere to study treatment

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

  • See Disease Characteristics
  • More than 2 weeks since prior and no concurrent chemotherapy
  • Prior or concurrent hormonal agents, including antiandrogens, gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists, aromatase inhibitors, tamoxifen, or similar agents allowed
  • No change in systemic therapy for 6 weeks before or within 4 weeks after initiating study radiotherapy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Radiation Therapy in Metastatic Cancer
Patients undergo hypofractionated highly conformal radiotherapy with helical tomotherapy once every other day over 5 days for a total of 3 fractions.
Patients complete a pain assessment questionnaire, Brief Pain Inventory at baseline and at 1 and 3 months after treatment.
Other Names:
  • Brief Pain Inventory
Conformal radiation therapy improves the ability to spare normal tissues.
Hypofractionated radiation therapy is delivered to maximize pain relief while minimizing patient impact if life expectancy is short.
Image guided radiation therapy targets the specific site of disease.
Tomotherapy is a delivery method which provides megavoltage computed tomography (CT) localization and may provide superior conformality and localization compared to other dynamic intensity modulated radiation therapy techniques.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
6-month Local Control (i.e., Complete Response, Partial Response, or Stable Disease) at All Treated Sites of Metastatic Disease
Time Frame: 6 months
Local control (e.g. absence of local progression) is defined as Complete response (CR), partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) of the treated site(s). Complete response is the disappearance of the target lesion. Partial response is a >/= 50% decrease in maximal dimension compared to pretreatment imaging. Stable disease does not qualify for CR, PR, or progression.Progression is an interval increase in the maximal dimension of the target lesion.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Time Frame: 9 months, 11 days
Here is the number of participants with adverse events. For the detailed list of adverse events see the adverse event module.
9 months, 11 days
Median Time to Local Progression
Time Frame: 6-12 months
Interval from initiation of treatment on protocol to symptomatic or radiographic progression.
6-12 months
12 Month Local Control in All Sites of Treatment, and at Each Site of Treatment
Time Frame: 12 months
Local control (e.g. absence of local progression) is defined as Complete response (CR), partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) of the treated site(s). Complete response is the disappearance of the target lesion. Partial response is a >/= 50% decrease in maximal dimension compared to pretreatment imaging. Stable disease does not qualify for CR, PR, or progression. Progression is an interval increase in the maximal dimension of the target lesion.
12 months
Interfraction and Intrafraction Motion With Megavoltage Computed Tomography (CT) Based on Sites of Metastasis
Time Frame: One to three months of followup
Megavoltage localization scans will be obtained and the physician and therapist will evaluate the cone beam image and compare this image to the expected image based on the patient's initial planning CT scan.
One to three months of followup
Pain at Sites of Metastases
Time Frame: One and three months of follow up
Improvement in pain from baseline will be assessed by the Brief Inventory for Pain criteria.
One and three months of follow up
Tumor Doubling Times During Systemic Treatment Compared Between Tumors Untreated With Radiation (Newly Developed Tumors) and Tumors Which Have Received Radiation Therapy
Time Frame: Baseline and prior to termination of systemic therapy or protocol withdrawal
Rate of growth of the composite (total) treated volume (up to four sites) compared to the composite volume of up to four newly identified and untreated prospectively-identified (at the time of systemic progression) metastatic sites. Volume doubling time will be calculated assuming an exponential growth pattern.
Baseline and prior to termination of systemic therapy or protocol withdrawal

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Deborah E. Citrin, MD, NCI - Radiation Oncology Branch; ROB

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2007

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

May 1, 2010

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

May 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 25, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 25, 2007

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

October 30, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

January 13, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 16, 2016

Last Verified

November 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sarcoma

Clinical Trials on questionnaire administration

3
Subscribe