Study to Evaluate the Consistency of Three Consecutive Production Lots of Influenza Vaccine in Healthy Subjects 18 to 49 Years Old

May 3, 2012 updated by: Novartis Vaccines

A Phase III, Randomized, Controlled, Observer-Blind, Single-Center Study to Evaluate the Consistency of Three Consecutive Lots of a Trivalent Subunit Influenza Vaccine Produced in Embryonated Hen Eggs in Healthy Subjects Aged 18 to 49 Years

The purpose of this research is to demonstrate immunologic equivalence of three consecutive production lots of the subunit influenza vaccine compared to egg-derived inactivated influenza vaccine in healthy subjects 18 to 49 years of ages. In addition, this study is to show how safe and well tolerated a conventional inactivated subunit influenza vaccine, licensed in many countries outside the United States, is compared to an inactivated influenza vaccine, licensed in the United States.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1507

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
        • Centro de Salud Galvan
      • Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
        • Hosp. Nuestra Sra. Altagracia

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 49 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 to 49 years of age;
  • In good health as determined by medical history and physical examination;
  • Able and willing to provide written informed consent prior to any study procedure;
  • Able to comply with all study procedures and available for all clinic visits scheduled in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any serious disease, such as: cancer, autoimmune disease (including rheumatoid arthritis), advanced arteriosclerotic disease or complicated diabetes mellitus
  • History of any anaphylaxis, serious vaccine reactions, or hypersensitivity to eggs, egg protein, chicken feathers, influenza viral protein, neomycin, polymyxin, or any other vaccine component, chemically related substance, or component of the potential packaging materials (latex);
  • Known or suspected impairment/alteration of immune function
  • Receipt of an influenza vaccine within 6 months prior to Visit 1;
  • Current drug or alcohol abuse or a history of drug or alcohol abuse that in the investigator's opinion would interfere with safety of the subject or the evaluation of the study objectives;
  • Laboratory-confirmed influenza disease within 6 months prior to Visit 1

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Influenza virus vaccine (lot A)
Lot A of the investigational influenza virus vaccine
1 injection of the trivalent subunit influenza virus vaccine (lot A) administered intramuscularly
Experimental: Influenza virus vaccine (lot B)
Lot B of the investigational influenza virus vaccine
1 injection of the trivalent subunit influenza virus vaccine (lot B) administered intramuscularly
Experimental: Influenza virus vaccine (lot C)
Lot C of the investigational influenza virus vaccine
1 injection of the trivalent subunit influenza virus vaccine (lot C) administered intramuscularly
Experimental: Influenza virus vaccine (pooled)
Pooled data of all three lots (Lot A, B and C) of the investigational influenza virus vaccine
1 injection of the pooled trivalent subunit influenza virus vaccine administered intramuscularly
Active Comparator: Comparator influenza vaccine
A US licensed influenza virus vaccine
1 injection of the trivalent subunit influenza virus vaccine administered intramuscularly

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Geometric Mean Titers (GMTs), by Vaccine Lots
Time Frame: 21 days after vaccination
The immunologic equivalence of three consecutive production lots of the influenza virus vaccine was measured in terms of GMTs for all vaccine influenza strains.
21 days after vaccination

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Geometric Mean Titers (GMTs), by Vaccine Group and Strain
Time Frame: 21 days after vaccination
The GMTs and 95% CIs were calculated for each of the vaccine group (three consecutive production lots pooled for the investigational influenza virus vaccine and comparator) and for each strain.
21 days after vaccination
Number of Subjects Reporting Solicited Local and Systemic Symptoms
Time Frame: 7 days after vaccination
Solicited local and systemic reactions were assessed after vaccination for the two vaccines (three consecutive production lots pooled for the investigational influenza virus vaccine and comparator) and for each of the three consecutive production lots of the investigational influenza virus vaccine.
7 days after vaccination
Number of Subjects With at Least One Unsolicited Adverse Event
Time Frame: 3 weeks after vaccination
Number of subjects reporting at least one unsolicited adverse event, regardless of the assessement of relatedness to the study vaccines (each of the three consecutive production lots of the investigational influenza virus vaccine, the pooled influenza virus vaccine, and the comparator influenza vaccine).
3 weeks after vaccination
Percentage of Subjects With Seroprotection and Seroconversion (Strain A/H1N1)
Time Frame: 21 days after vaccination

The percentage of subjects who were seroprotected and seroconverted were considered statistically compliant with the stated CBER guidance criteria if:

  • the lower bound of the two-sided 95% CI for the percentage of seroprotected subjects (HI antibody titer ≥1:40) met or exceeded 70%.
  • the lower bound of the two-sided 95% CI for the percentage of subjects achieving seroconversion rate (prevaccination HI<10/ postvaccination HI ≥40 or at least a fourfold increase in titer from non-negative prevaccination serum [HI≥10]), for HI antibody met or exceeded 40%.
21 days after vaccination
Percentage of Subjects With Seroprotection and Seroconversion (Strain A/H3N2)
Time Frame: 21 days after vaccination

The percentage of subjects who were seroprotected and seroconverted were considered statistically compliant with the stated CBER guidance criteria if:

  • the lower bound of the two-sided 95% CI for the percentage of seroprotected subjects (HI antibody titer ≥1:40) met or exceeded 70%.
  • the lower bound of the two-sided 95% CI for the percentage of subjects achieving seroconversion rate (prevaccination HI<10/ postvaccination HI ≥40 or at least a fourfold increase in titer from non-negative prevaccination serum [HI≥10]), for HI antibody met or exceeded 40%.
21 days after vaccination
Percentage of Subjects With Seroprotection and Seroconversion (Strain B)
Time Frame: 21 days after vaccination

The percentage of subjects who were seroprotected and seroconverted were considered statistically compliant with the stated CBER guidance criteria if:

  • the lower bound of the two-sided 95% CI for the percentage of seroprotected subjects (HI antibody titer ≥1:40) met or exceeded 70%.
  • the lower bound of the two-sided 95% CI for the percentage of subjects achieving seroconversion rate (prevaccination HI<10/ postvaccination HI ≥40 or at least a fourfold increase in titer from non-negative prevaccination serum [HI≥10]), for HI antibody met or exceeded 40%.
21 days after vaccination

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2007

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 6, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 15, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

February 18, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 8, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 3, 2012

Last Verified

May 1, 2012

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Influenza

Clinical Trials on Lot A of Influenza virus vaccine

3
Subscribe