Molecule Removal and Ease of Use: A Comparison of Two Different Dialyzers

April 4, 2017 updated by: Baxter Healthcare Corporation

Urea, Phosphate and b2-Microglobulin Removal and Ease of Use: Comparing the Polyflux HD-C4 With the Polyflux 210H

The Polyflux HD-C4 (Gambro Renal Products) is a new dialyzer based on the existing Polyflux H membrane and dialyzer technology, but which achieves a performance comparable to Polyflux 210H in a significantly smaller device.

The objectives of this study are:

  1. To compare and contrast small and large molecule removal by the Polyflux HD-C4 and Polyflux 210H dialyzers under conditions of routine hemodialysis; and,
  2. To compare and contrast the ease of use of the Polyflux HD-C4 dialyzer with that of the Polyflux 210H under conditions of routine clinical use for hemodialysis.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

12

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Minnesota
      • Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55404
        • DaVita Clinical Research Facility

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults 18 years of age or older
  • Stable hemodialysis prescription using Polyflux 210H or Polyflux 21R for at least 2 months prior to study enrollment
  • Dialyzing through a native fistula or Gore-Tex graft.
  • Blood access must be able to provide a blood flow rate of 400 ml/min.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non-compliance with dialysis
  • Hematocrit less than 28%
  • Active Infection

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: HD-C4 First, then 210H
Subjects will be randomly assigned to begin the first week of three consecutive treatments with the Polyflux HD-C4 dialyzer. Following the third treatment, the subjects will be switched to the Polyflux 210H dialyzer for a second week of three consecutive treatments. Therefore each subject will have a total of six consecutive dialysis treatments.
Three consecutive treatments with the Polyflux 210H dialyzer. All study treatments will be performed in the standard hemodialysis mode.
Other Names:
  • Gambro Polyflux 210H dialyzer
Three consecutive treatments with the Polyflux HD-C4 dialyzer. All study treatments will be performed in the standard hemodialysis mode.
Other Names:
  • Gambro Revaclear
Other: 210H First, then HD-C4
Subjects will be randomly assigned to begin the first week of three consecutive treatments with the Polyflux 210H dialyzer. Following the third treatment, the subjects will be switched to the Polyflux HD-C4 dialyzer for a second week of three consecutive treatments. Therefore each subject will have a total of six consecutive dialysis treatments.
Three consecutive treatments with the Polyflux 210H dialyzer. All study treatments will be performed in the standard hemodialysis mode.
Other Names:
  • Gambro Polyflux 210H dialyzer
Three consecutive treatments with the Polyflux HD-C4 dialyzer. All study treatments will be performed in the standard hemodialysis mode.
Other Names:
  • Gambro Revaclear

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of Urea Removal Under Conditions of Routine Hemodialysis.
Time Frame: 2 weeks = duration required for each subject to complete 6 consecutive dialysis treatments
Urea removal is correlated with successful clinical outcomes. Kt/V is a way of measuring the delivered dose of dialysis where K=clearance of urea, t=treatment time and V=volume of body water. Single-pool (sp) Kt/V assumes that urea is removed from a single compartment in the human body during dialysis. However, because there are multiple compartments in the human body, rebound occurs following hemodialysis which lowers the Kt/V. Equilibrated (e) Kt/V is an equation that has been devised to predict the amount of rebound based on the ratio of K/V. Outcomes are posted for both spKt/V and eKt/V.
2 weeks = duration required for each subject to complete 6 consecutive dialysis treatments
A Comparison of Pre- to Post-dialysis Reduction of Small and Large Molecules Under Conditions of Routine Hemodialysis.
Time Frame: 2 weeks = duration required for each subject to complete 6 consecutive dialysis treatments
Overall removal of urea, phosphorus and β2-microglobulin was determined from the pre- to post-dialysis change in plasma concentration and from the amount of solute recovered in the dialysate. This outcome measure is reported as the percentage of pre- to post-dialysis reduction of urea, phosphorus and β2-microglobulin.
2 weeks = duration required for each subject to complete 6 consecutive dialysis treatments

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of Dialyzer Ease of Use Between the Polyflux HD-C4 Dialyzer and the Polyflux 210H
Time Frame: 2 weeks = duration required for each subject to complete 6 consecutive dialysis treatments
Assessment of blood side priming: 1=Very Easy 2=Acceptable 3=Difficult 4=Very Difficult / Assessment of dialysate side priming: 1=Perfect 2=Acceptable 3= Not Acceptable / Appearance of dialyzer fibers: 1=Very Good 2=Good 3=Poor 4=Very Poor / Appearance of dialyzer arterial header: 1=Very Good 2=Good 3=Poor 4=Very Poor / Appearance of venous header: 1=Very Good 2=Good 3=Poor 4=Very Poor /
2 weeks = duration required for each subject to complete 6 consecutive dialysis treatments

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Harry Alcorn Jr., PharmD, DaVita Clinical Research Facility

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 13, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 11, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

March 14, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 10, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 4, 2017

Last Verified

April 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Kidney Disease

Clinical Trials on Polyflux 210H dialyzer

3
Subscribe