A Study of Bevacizumab in Combination With Chemotherapy for Treatment of Osteosarcoma

August 3, 2023 updated by: St. Jude Children's Research Hospital

A Study of Bevacizumab, a Humanized Monoclonal Antibody Against Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF), in Combination With Chemotherapy for Treatment of Osteosarcoma

This study adopts a novel strategy for first-line treatment of osteosarcoma by combining chemotherapy with anti-angiogenic therapy using bevacizumab (Avastin®), a humanized monoclonal antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Chemotherapy for localized disease comprises a 3-drug regimen (cisplatin, doxorubicin, and high-dose methotrexate). Chemotherapy for metastatic or unresectable disease comprises a cisplatin-based regimen that includes high-dose methotrexate, doxorubicin, ifosfamide, and etoposide.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a comprehensive study that uses a novel agent that targets angiogenesis (bevacizumab) in combination with conventional chemotherapy for the treatment of osteosarcoma. Bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody against the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), has been shown to stop the growth of new blood vessels of tumors, both in the laboratory and in patients with other types of cancers. Bevacizumab has improved the effect of chemotherapy in adult patients with different types of cancer by increasing tumor response and increasing the chances of survival. This study has two main goals:

  • To find out if bevacizumab can be combined safely with chemotherapy for osteosarcoma
  • To find out if adding bevacizumab to chemotherapy will be beneficial in treating osteosarcoma.

The chemotherapy drugs used in this study are commonly used to treat osteosarcoma. Patients with non-metastatic and resectable tumors receive bevacizumab and chemotherapy comprised of cisplatin, doxorubicin and high-dose methotrexate. Patients with metastatic tumors or tumors that cannot be removed by surgery receive bevacizumab and chemotherapy comprised of cisplatin, doxorubicin and high-dose methotrexate, ifosfamide and etoposide. If the tumor can be removed by surgery, surgery will be performed after 10 weeks of chemotherapy and will be followed by additional chemotherapy. After completion of active therapy, patient's response to therapy will be followed for approximately 5 years.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

43

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92123
        • Rady Children's Hospital and Health Center
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21231
        • Johns Hopkins - Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center
      • Bethesda, Maryland, United States, 20892
        • NCI/NIH - Pediatric Oncology Branch
    • Tennessee
      • Memphis, Tennessee, United States, 38105
        • St Jude Children's Research Hospital
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030-4009
        • MD Anderson Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 30 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient must have newly diagnosed high-grade, biopsy proven, osteosarcoma or malignant fibrous histiocytoma (MFH) of bone with no history of prior chemotherapy or radiation;
  • Participant is able to perform tasks and daily activities as defined in the study guidelines
  • Patient meets established guidelines for adequate function of the kidney, liver, heart and bone marrow
  • Participants meets other requirements defined in the eligibility portion of the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • recent major surgical procedure or injury
  • Known bleeding diathesis, platelet disorder or coagulopathy
  • Thrombosis
  • Cardiac disease or hypertension
  • Significant proteinuria
  • Central nervous system disease
  • Gastrointestinal perforation/abdominal fistula
  • Osteosarcoma or MFH of bone as second malignancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Localized Resectable Disease (Stratum A)
Participants with localized resectable disease receive Cycle 1 of bevacizumab 3 days before chemotherapy with cisplatin and doxorubicin. Subsequent cycles consist of bevacizumab on the first day of chemotherapy, then cisplatin, and doxorubicin, or methotrexate. If applicable, definitive surgery and assessment of histologic response will occur at week 10 followed by bevacizumab on the first day of chemotherapy with cisplatin and doxorubicin, or methotrexate.
Given IV.
Other Names:
  • MTX
Given IV.
Other Names:
  • Adriamycin®
Monoclonal Antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Given intravenously (IV).
Other Names:
  • rhuMAb VEGF
  • Avastin®
Given IV.
Other Names:
  • Platinol-AQ®
Participants undergo definitive surgery and assessment of histologic response at week 10.
Experimental: Metastatic Disease (Stratum B)
Participants with metastatic disease (Stratum B) receive Cycle 1 of bevacizumab 3 days before chemotherapy with cisplatin and doxorubicin. Subsequent cycles consist of bevacizumab on the first day of chemotherapy, then cisplatin and doxorubicin, methotrexate or ifosfamide, and etoposide. If applicable, definitive surgery and assessment of histologic response will occur at week 10 followed by bevacizumab on the first day of chemotherapy with cisplatin and doxorubicin, methotrexate, or ifosfamide, and etoposide. Radiotherapy will be given post-operatively.
Given IV.
Other Names:
  • MTX
Given IV.
Other Names:
  • Adriamycin®
Given IV.
Other Names:
  • VP-16
  • Vepesid®
Monoclonal Antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Given intravenously (IV).
Other Names:
  • rhuMAb VEGF
  • Avastin®
Given IV.
Other Names:
  • Platinol-AQ®
Participants undergo definitive surgery and assessment of histologic response at week 10.
Given IV.
Other Names:
  • Ifex®
Radiation therapy delivered for positive margins or intralesional resections.
Experimental: Unresectable Disease (Stratum C)
Participants with unresectable disease (Stratum C) receive treatment identical to Stratum B: Cycle 1 of bevacizumab 3 days before chemotherapy with cisplatin and doxorubicin. Subsequent cycles consist of bevacizumab on the first day of chemotherapy, then cisplatin and doxorubicin, methotrexate or ifosfamide, and etoposide. If applicable, definitive surgery and assessment of histologic response will occur at week 10 followed by bevacizumab on the first day of chemotherapy with cisplatin and doxorubicin, methotrexate, or ifosfamide, and etoposide. Radiotherapy will be given post-operatively.
Given IV.
Other Names:
  • MTX
Given IV.
Other Names:
  • Adriamycin®
Given IV.
Other Names:
  • VP-16
  • Vepesid®
Monoclonal Antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Given intravenously (IV).
Other Names:
  • rhuMAb VEGF
  • Avastin®
Given IV.
Other Names:
  • Platinol-AQ®
Participants undergo definitive surgery and assessment of histologic response at week 10.
Given IV.
Other Names:
  • Ifex®
Radiation therapy delivered for positive margins or intralesional resections.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Unacceptable Toxicity
Time Frame: After all patients have completed therapy, up to 1 year after last patient is enrolled

Objective: To study the feasibility of combining: 1) bevacizumab with cisplatin, doxorubicin, and high-dose methotrexate (MAP) in patients with localized resectable osteosarcoma; and 2) bevacizumab with MAP and ifosfamide, and etoposide in patients with unresectable or metastatic osteosarcoma.

The target unacceptable toxicity is defined as grade 4 hypertension, proteinuria, or bleeding excluding petechiae/purpura, grade 3/4 thrombosis/embolism excluding catheter-related thrombosis. The unacceptable toxicity for major wound complication is defined as grade 2, 3, or 4 major wound complications.

A six-stage group sequential stopping rule was developed for monitoring unacceptable toxicity.

After all patients have completed therapy, up to 1 year after last patient is enrolled
3-Year Event Free Survival
Time Frame: After all patients have completed therapy, up to 4 years after last patient is enrolled
To study the effect of adding bevacizumab to chemotherapy comprised of cisplatin, doxorubicin, and high-dose methotrexate (HDMTX) on the event-free survival (EFS) in patients with localized resectable osteosarcoma. The Kaplan-Meier (K-M) method was used to estimate survival rate.
After all patients have completed therapy, up to 4 years after last patient is enrolled

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Histologic Response by Stratum
Time Frame: After 6 cycles of chemotherapy, up to 1 year after the start of therapy

The effect of adding bevacizumab to preoperative chemotherapy comprised of cisplatin, doxorubicin, and HDMTX on the histologic response in patients with localized resectable osteosarcoma compared to historical controls treated with preoperative cisplatin, doxorubicin, and HDMTX without bevacizumab on the Intergroup Study 0133.

Histologic response at week 10 of therapy was evaluated by Huvos grading systems as grade I: tumor not responding to therapy, no effect identified; grade IIA: more than 50% viable tumor left; grade IIB: 5-50% viable tumor remaining; grade III: only scattered foci of viable tumor seen (less than 5% of tumor); grade IV: no viable tumor seen in extensive sampling (at least a full cross-section of the tumor).

The study did not enroll an adequate number of participants, therefore, the comparison to Intergroup Study 0133 participants was not done.

After 6 cycles of chemotherapy, up to 1 year after the start of therapy
2-Year Event Free Survival (EFS) of Patients With Osteosarcoma
Time Frame: After all patients have completed therapy, up to 2 years after last patient is enrolled
Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the EFS of patients with osteosarcoma treated with chemotherapy and Bevacizumab.
After all patients have completed therapy, up to 2 years after last patient is enrolled
2-Year Overall Survival (OS) of Patients With Osteosarcoma
Time Frame: After all patients have completed therapy, up to 2 years after last patient is enrolled
Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the OS of patients with osteosarcoma treated with chemotherapy and Bevacizumab.
After all patients have completed therapy, up to 2 years after last patient is enrolled
2-Year Event Free Survival (EFS) in Patients With Localized Resectable Disease Compared to St. Jude OS99 Protocol.
Time Frame: After all patients have completed therapy, up to 2 years after last patient is enrolled
The current protocol OS2008 (NCT00667342) was closed early due to slow accrual. Thus, with the limited number of patients, the comparison of EFS of OS20008 to that of OS99 (NCT00145639) participants was not done. The 2-year EFS of OS2008 participants is reported here.
After all patients have completed therapy, up to 2 years after last patient is enrolled
2-Year Overall Survival (OS) in Patients With Localized Resectable Disease Compared to OS99 Protocol.
Time Frame: After all patients have completed therapy, up to 2 years after last patient is enrolled
The current protocol OS2008 (NCT00667342) was closed early due to slow accrual. Thus, with the limited number of patients, the comparison of EFS of OS2008 to that of OS99 (NCT00145639) participants was not done. The 2-year OS of OS2008 participants is reported here.
After all patients have completed therapy, up to 2 years after last patient is enrolled
Mean Ktrans
Time Frame: Baseline through Week 10
The volume transfer constant (Ktrans) was used to evaluate clinical outcomes. The average for the distribution across the whole region of interest (ROI) was calculated as a summary measure for each data set.
Baseline through Week 10
Mean Vp
Time Frame: Baseline through Week 10
The fractional blood plasma volume (Vp) was used to evaluate clinical outcomes. The average for the distribution across the whole region of interest (ROI) was calculated as a summary measure for each data set.
Baseline through Week 10
Mean Ve
Time Frame: Baseline through Week 10
The fractional volume of extravascular extracellular space (Ve) was used to evaluate clinical outcomes. The average for the distribution across the whole region of interest (ROI) was calculated as a summary measure for each data set.
Baseline through Week 10
Histologic Response by Number of Participants
Time Frame: at week 10 after start of therapy
The association of interested variables with response was checked with the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. The response is based on the Huvos grade of histologic response for DCE-MRI comparisons and is defined as good for ≥90% necrosis and poor for less than 90%.
at week 10 after start of therapy
Ktrans by Good and Poor Response
Time Frame: at week 10 after start of therapy
The response is based on the Huvos grade of histologic response for DCE-MRI comparisons and is defined as good for ≥90% necrosis and poor for less than 90%.
at week 10 after start of therapy
P95 of Ktrans by Good and Poor Response
Time Frame: at week 10 after start of therapy
The response is based on the Huvos grade of histologic response for DCE-MRI comparisons and is defined as good for ≥90% necrosis and poor for less than 90%. P95 denotes the level of each kinetic parameter exceeding 95% of its values in each tumor.
at week 10 after start of therapy
Difference Between Good and Poor Response by SUVmax
Time Frame: at week 10 after start of therapy
The response is based on the Huvos grade of histologic response for DCE-MRI comparisons and is defined as good for ≥90% necrosis and poor for less than 90%.
at week 10 after start of therapy

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Neuropathic Pain (NP) Following Surgery
Time Frame: Up to 6 months postoperatively
Of the 43 participants enrolled on this trial, 37 met criteria for evaluation of neuropathic pain (NP) following definitive surgery. The 37 participants underwent 38 surgeries: one participant had a limb-sparing surgery followed by an amputation surgery. Six of 43 participants were excluded from evaluation for NP: 1 due to deep vein thrombosis, 2 removed from study prior to surgery, 1 removed immediately after surgery to receive radiation therapy, 1 had non-extremity osteosarcoma, and 1 patient had a fibula resection. Patients were followed for neuropathic pain daily for the first week postoperatively and weekly for up to 6 months postoperatively.
Up to 6 months postoperatively
Median Duration of Neuropathic Pain
Time Frame: From surgery until resolution of NP symptoms, up to 6 months
Thirty participants who underwent surgery (31 surgeries) were determined to have neuropathic pain. Four participants received only opioids for NP and 26 participants (for 27 surgeries) were treated with NP specific medications including gabapentin, tricyclic antidepressant, methadone. One participant had 2 different surgical procedures and was analyzed both in the limb sparing group and in the amputation group.
From surgery until resolution of NP symptoms, up to 6 months
Mean Duration of Neuropathic Pain
Time Frame: From surgery until resolution of NP symptoms, up to 6 months
Thirty participants who underwent surgery (31 surgeries) were determined to have neuropathic pain (NP). Four participants received only opioids for NP and 26 participants (for 27 surgeries) were treated with NP specific medications including gabapentin, tricyclic antidepressant, methadone. One participant had 2 different surgical procedures and was analyzed both in the limb sparing group and in the amputation group.
From surgery until resolution of NP symptoms, up to 6 months
Median Duration of Neuropathic Pain Medication
Time Frame: From surgery until resolution of NP symptoms, up to 6 months
Thirty participants who underwent surgery (31 surgeries) were determined to have neuropathic pain (NP). Four participants received only opioids for NP and 26 participants (for 27 surgeries) were treated with NP specific medications including gabapentin, tricyclic antidepressant, methadone. One participant had 2 different surgical procedures and was analyzed both in the limb sparing group and in the amputation group.
From surgery until resolution of NP symptoms, up to 6 months
Mean Duration of Neuropathic Pain Medication
Time Frame: From surgery until resolution of NP symptoms, up to 6 months
Thirty participants who underwent surgery (31 surgeries) were determined to have neuropathic pain. Four participants received only opioids for NP and 26 participants (for 27 surgeries) were treated with NP specific medications including gabapentin, tricyclic antidepressant, methadone. One participant had 2 different surgical procedures and was analyzed both in the limb sparing group and in the amputation group.
From surgery until resolution of NP symptoms, up to 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michael Bishop, MD, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 3, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 24, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 25, 2008

First Posted (Estimated)

April 28, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 7, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 3, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteosarcoma

Clinical Trials on Methotrexate

Subscribe