Pioglitazone Versus Metformin in Type 2 Diabetes

November 17, 2015 updated by: Dario Giugliano, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli"

Effect of Pioglitazone Compared With Metformin on Endothelial Microparticles in Type 2 Diabetes. A Randomized Trial

Type 2 diabetes is an epidemic. Its long-term consequences translate into enormous human suffering and economic costs; however, much of the morbidity associated with long-term microvascular and neuropathic complications can be substantially reduced by interventions that achieve glucose levels close to the nondiabetic range. However, none of the recent intervention studies has demonstrated a benefit of intensive glycemic control on their primary CVD outcomes.

The investigators report the findings of a long-term randomized and comparator-controlled clinical trial conducted in patients with newly-diagnosed type 2 diabetes. The investigators compared the effect of pioglitazone with that of metformin on circulating endothelial cell-derived submicroscopic membranous vesicles, termed microparticles: because of their putative role in inflammatory processes and their ability to directly affect endothelial functions, they are gaining increasing popularity as a surrogate marker of cardiovascular outlook. Metformin was chosen as a comparator because the American Diabetes Association recommendations suggest to start therapy in newly-diagnosed type 2 diabetic subjects combining a drug (metformin) with lifestyle changes. Moreover, the mechanism of action of pioglitazone is distinct from that of metformin.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

150

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Naples, Italy, 80138
        • Department of Geriatrics and Metabolic Diseases

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Men and women aged 30-75 years, with newly-diagnosed type 2 diabetes (according to the ADA criteria) and never treated with antihyperglycemic drugs, were selected for the study. Inclusion criteria also included a body mass index (BMI) >25 kg/m2, and HbA1c level <10%.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy or breast-feeding
  • Any investigational drug within the previous 3 months
  • Use of agents affecting glycemic control (systemic glucocorticoids, and weight-loss drugs)
  • Presence of any clinically relevant somatic or mental diseases that anticipated poor adherence to diet regimens
  • To minimize the likelihood of including subjects with late-onset type 1 diabetes, candidates with a positive test for anti-GAD antibody or with fasting plasma C-peptide less than 0.76 ng/L (<0.25 pmol/L) were excluded
  • Also excluded were patients with abnormal laboratory tests, including liver enzymes (alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase) greater than 3 times the upper limit of normal, and serum creatinine greater than 123.8 μmol/L (1.4 mg/dL).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 1
15-45 mg/die
Active Comparator: 2
500-2000 mg/die

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Circulating Endothelial microparticles
Time Frame: six months
six months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Glucose profile, lipid profile, hemoglobin A1c, carotid intima-media thickness
Time Frame: six months
six months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 29, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 29, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

December 30, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 18, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 17, 2015

Last Verified

November 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Type 2 Diabetes

Clinical Trials on Pioglitazone

3
Subscribe