Inspiratory Support Improves Preoxygenation in Healthy Subjects

June 17, 2009 updated by: Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital

The Efficacy and Tolerability of Different Levels of Inspiratory Support and PEEP During Preoxygenation. A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Preoxygenation optimizes oxygen content in the functional residual capacity (FRC). Adequate preoxygenation is defined by an expiratory oxygen fraction (FEO2) > 90%. Inspiratory support and positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) can create a better reservoir, improve gas exchange and shorten the time needed for adequate preoxygenation. The goal of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of different levels of inspiratory support and positive end expiratory pressure during preoxygenation in healthy subjects.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

We conducted a double blind prospective randomized trial on 20 healthy volunteers. Each subject went through three modes of preoxygenation in random order: normal breathing (SP), breathing under inspiratory support 4 cmH2O/PEEP 4 cmH2O (PSM-4) and inspiratory support 6 cmH2O /PEEP 4 cmH2O (PSM-6). Each mode lasted for 3 min and parameters were recorded every 10 s. We evaluated subject's tolerance, leaks and easiness of each mode of preoxygenation according to a simplified (1 to 4) scale. Two-way ANOVA was used to compare FEO2 while simple ANOVA was used for time to reach FEO2=90%.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H1T 2M4
        • Maisonneuve Rosemont Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 40 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy volunteers
  • Aged between 20 to 40 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Body mass index > 30
  • Mustache, beard
  • Claustrophobia

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: BiPAP6 assisted preoxygenation
Spontaneous breathing of 100% oxygen in a facemask with application of an inspiratory pressure of 6 cm H2O and a positive end-expiratory pressure of 4 cm H2O, for 3 minutes.
Active Comparator: BiPAP4 assisted preoxygenation
Spontaneous breathing of 100% oxygen in a facemask with application of an inspiratory pressure of 4 cm H2O and a positive end-expiratory pressure of 4 cm H2O, for 3 minutes
Active Comparator: Standard preoxygenation (VS)
Spontaneous breathing of 100% oxygen in a facemask for 3 minutes

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
expiratory oxygen fraction (end-tidal 02)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
inspiratory oxygen fraction
end-tidal CO2
tidal volume
inspiratory pressure
subject's tolerance
leaks around the mask during preoxygenation
minute volume
endexpiratory pressure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Issam Tanoubi, M.D., Maisonneuve Rosemont Hospital, University Of Montreal
  • Study Director: François Donati, PhD, MD, FRCPC, Maisonneuve Rosemont Hospital, University Of Montreal
  • Study Chair: Pierre Drolet, MD, FRCPC, Maisonneuve Rosemont Hospital, University Of Montreal
  • Principal Investigator: Louis Phillipe Fortier, MSc, MD, FRCPC, Maisonneuve Rosemont Hospital, University Of Montreal

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2007

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2007

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 16, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 16, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

June 17, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 18, 2009

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 17, 2009

Last Verified

June 1, 2009

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Healthy

Clinical Trials on AI-6/PEEP-4

3
Subscribe