A Dose-Ranging Study of MK-5442 in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis (MK-5442-001)

February 1, 2015 updated by: Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC

A Phase IIb, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Ranging Study of MK-5442 in the Treatment of Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis

The purpose of this study was to identify an appropriate dose of

MK-5442 that produced an osteoanabolic effect without causing hypercalcemia in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Amendment 4 of the protocol changed the duration of the study from 2 years to 6 months.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

383

Phase

  • Phase 2

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

45 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Postmenopausal for at least 5 years
  • No history of fragility fracture, unless participant is not willing to take marketed osteoporosis therapy or is not a candidate for marketed osteoporosis therapy
  • Agrees not to use medications for osteoporosis except medications associated with the study
  • Areal bone mineral density (BMD) T-score <-2.5 at one or more of the following 4 BMD sites: total hip, femoral neck, trochanter, or lumbar spine and is ≥ -3.5 at all 4 BMD sites. Participants unwilling to take or ineligible for marketed osteoporosis therapy may have one or more areal BMD T-scores of < -3.5

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to undergo dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan due to obesity (ie, weight >250 lbs)
  • Use of oral bisphosphonates in the 6 months prior to study screening, for more than 3 months in the past 2 years, or lifetime use of more than 6 months
  • Use of intravenous bisphosphonates, strontium, or growth hormone at any time
  • Use of phenytoin or heparin within 2 weeks prior to Visit 1; use of raloxifene within 6 months prior to Visit 1
  • Use of pioglitazone or rosiglitazone at study screening
  • Use of estrogen ± progestin, in any form other than vaginal or topical application, for 6 months prior to Study Visit 1
  • Prior total thyroidectomy
  • Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)- positive or acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS)-related illness
  • History of malignant cancer within 5 years of study screening, except for certain skin or cervical cancers
  • History of Paget's disease and/or kidney stones
  • An active user of any illicit drug
  • History of or active alcohol abuse
  • Participated in an investigational drug study within the past 30 days

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: MK-5442 2.5 mg
Following a 2-week open-label placebo run-in, participants received a daily oral dose of 2.5 mg of MK-5442 for a duration of at least 6 months.
MK-5442 2.5 mg, 5 mg, 7.5 mg, 10 mg, or 15 mg tablet once daily for at least 6 months.
Dose-matched oral placebo to MK-5442
Vitamin D3, two 400 IU tablets daily throughout the study.
Participants who had a calcium intake of less than 1200 mg/day at baseline received a daily 500 mg calcium supplement throughout the study.
Experimental: MK-5442 5 mg
Following a 2-week open-label placebo run-in, participants received a daily oral dose of 5 mg of MK-5442 for a duration of at least 6 months.
MK-5442 2.5 mg, 5 mg, 7.5 mg, 10 mg, or 15 mg tablet once daily for at least 6 months.
Dose-matched oral placebo to MK-5442
Vitamin D3, two 400 IU tablets daily throughout the study.
Participants who had a calcium intake of less than 1200 mg/day at baseline received a daily 500 mg calcium supplement throughout the study.
Experimental: MK-5442 7.5 mg
Following a 2-week open-label placebo run-in, participants received a daily oral dose of 7.5 mg of MK-5442 for a duration of at least 6 months.
MK-5442 2.5 mg, 5 mg, 7.5 mg, 10 mg, or 15 mg tablet once daily for at least 6 months.
Dose-matched oral placebo to MK-5442
Vitamin D3, two 400 IU tablets daily throughout the study.
Participants who had a calcium intake of less than 1200 mg/day at baseline received a daily 500 mg calcium supplement throughout the study.
Experimental: MK-5442 10 mg
Following a 2-week open-label placebo run-in, participants received a daily oral dose of 10 mg of MK-5442 for a duration of at least 6 months.
MK-5442 2.5 mg, 5 mg, 7.5 mg, 10 mg, or 15 mg tablet once daily for at least 6 months.
Dose-matched oral placebo to MK-5442
Vitamin D3, two 400 IU tablets daily throughout the study.
Participants who had a calcium intake of less than 1200 mg/day at baseline received a daily 500 mg calcium supplement throughout the study.
Experimental: MK-5442 15 mg
Following a 2-week open-label placebo run-in, participants received a daily oral dose of 15 mg of MK-5442 for a duration of at least 6 months.
MK-5442 2.5 mg, 5 mg, 7.5 mg, 10 mg, or 15 mg tablet once daily for at least 6 months.
Dose-matched oral placebo to MK-5442
Vitamin D3, two 400 IU tablets daily throughout the study.
Participants who had a calcium intake of less than 1200 mg/day at baseline received a daily 500 mg calcium supplement throughout the study.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Following a 2-week open-label placebo run-in, participants received a daily oral dose of placebo dose-matched to MK-5442 for a duration of at least 6 months.
Dose-matched oral placebo to MK-5442
Vitamin D3, two 400 IU tablets daily throughout the study.
Participants who had a calcium intake of less than 1200 mg/day at baseline received a daily 500 mg calcium supplement throughout the study.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Least Squares (LS) Mean Percent Change From Baseline to Month 6 in Lumbar Spine Areal Bone Mineral Density (aBMD)
Time Frame: Baseline (BL) and Month 6
Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) was used to assess and measure aBMD of the lumbar spine. Areal BMD was measured as "areal" density using units of gram (gm) of tissue /centimeter of tissue squared (cm^2).
Baseline (BL) and Month 6
Percentage of Participants With Total Serum Calcium Levels Outside the Pre-defined Limits of Change
Time Frame: Baseline through Month 6

Normal serum calcium level is 8-10 mg/dL (2-2.5 mmol/L) with some interlaboratory variation in the reference range, and hypercalcemia is defined as a serum calcium level greater than 10.5 mg/dL (>2.5 mmol/L).

Based on these references, ≥10.6 mg/dL was predefined in this study as the cut-off for the normal limits of change. Participants with calcium levels ≥10.6 mg/dL were considered as having a "Tier 1" safety event.

Baseline through Month 6
Percentage of Participants With Albumin-Corrected Calcium Levels Outside the Pre-defined Limits of Change
Time Frame: Baseline through Month 6

Albumin-Corrected Calcium = ([4 - plasma albumin in g/dL] × 0.8 + serum calcium).

≥10.6 mg/dL was predefined in this study as the cut-off for the normal limits of change. Participants with albumin-corrected calcium levels ≥10.6 mg/dL were considered as having a "Tier 1" safety event.

Baseline through Month 6
Percentage of Participants With Kidney Stones
Time Frame: Baseline through Month 6
Evidence of kidney stone(s) was considered an event of interest and was prespecified as a "Tier 1" safety event.
Baseline through Month 6
Percentage of Participants With Bone Neoplasms
Time Frame: Baseline through Month 6
Evidence of bone neoplasm(s) was considered an event of interest and was prespecified as a "Tier 1" safety event.
Baseline through Month 6

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
LS Mean Percent Change From Baseline to Month 6 in Total Hip aBMD
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 6
DXA was used to assess and measure aBMD of the total hip. Areal BMD was measured as "areal" density using units of gram (gm) of tissue /centimeter of tissue squared (cm^2).
Baseline and Month 6
LS Mean Percent Change From Baseline to Month 6 in Femoral Neck aBMD
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 6
DXA was used to assess and measure aBMD of the femoral neck. Areal BMD was measured as "areal" density using units of gram (gm) of tissue /centimeter of tissue squared (cm^2).
Baseline and Month 6
LS Mean Percent Change From Baseline to Month 6 in Trochanter aBMD
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 6
DXA was used to assess and measure aBMD of the trochanter. Areal BMD was measured as "areal" density using units of gram (gm) of tissue /centimeter of tissue squared (cm^2).
Baseline and Month 6
LS Mean Percent Change From Baseline to Month 6 in Total Body aBMD
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 6
DXA was used to assess and measure aBMD of the total body. Areal BMD was measured as "areal" density using units of gram (gm) of tissue /centimeter of tissue squared (cm^2).
Baseline and Month 6
LS Mean Percent Change From Baseline to Month 6 in Distal One-third Forearm Areal BMD
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 6
DXA was used to assess and measure aBMD of the distal 1/3 forearm. Areal BMD was measured as "areal" density using units of gram (gm) of tissue /centimeter of tissue squared (cm^2).
Baseline and Month 6
LS Mean Percent Change From Baseline to Month 6 in Trabecular Volumetric BMD of the Hip
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 6
Quantitative computed tomography (QCT) technology was used to assess and measure bone mineral content volumetrically (ie, in grams of tissue per centimeter of tissue cubed).
Baseline and Month 6
LS Mean Percent Change From Baseline to Month 6 in Trabecular Volumetric BMD of the Lumbar Spine
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 6
Quantitative computed tomography (QCT) technology was used at baseline and periodically through out the study to assess and measure bone mineral content volumetrically (ie, in grams of tissue per centimeter of tissue cubed).
Baseline and Month 6
LS Mean Percent Change From Baseline to Month 6 in the Ratio of Urinary N-Telopeptides of Type I Collagen to Creatinine (u-NTx/Cr)
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 6
The ratio of u-NTx to Cr is a biomarker for bone resorption. It is measured in the serum in units of nanomoles (nm) of bone collagen equivalents (BCE)/millimoles of creatinine (Cr).
Baseline and Month 6
LS Mean Percent Change From Baseline to Month 6 in Serum C-Terminal Telopeptide Collagen I (s-CTx)
Time Frame: Baseline to Month 6
C-Terminal Telopeptide Collagen I is used as a serum-marker of bone resorption in the assessment of osteoporosis.
Baseline to Month 6
LS Mean Percent Change From Baseline to Month 6 in Serum Bone-Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (s-BSAP)
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 6
Bone Specific Alkaline Phosphatase is a biomarker of bone formation and is measured in units of microgram (μg)/liter (L).
Baseline and Month 6
LS Mean Percent Change From Baseline to Month 6 in Serum Procollagen Type I N-Terminal Propeptide (P1NP)
Time Frame: Baseline to Month 6
Measurement of P1NP appears to be a sensitive marker of bone formation rate in the assessment of osteoporosis.
Baseline to Month 6
LS Mean Percent Change From Baseline to Month 6 in Serum Osteocalcin
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 6
Serum osteocalcin is a biomarker of bone formation and is measured using units of nanograms (ng) / milliliter (mL).
Baseline and Month 6

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 17, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 17, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

August 18, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 18, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 1, 2015

Last Verified

February 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteoporosis

Clinical Trials on MK-5442

3
Subscribe