The Impact of Post-tetanic Count on Subsequent Train-of-four During Recovery From Rocuronium

April 26, 2010 updated by: Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital
The purpose of this study is to see how long does the effect of a post-tetanic facilitation last on subsequent train-of-four. The investigators hypothesis is that the effect last at least 30 minutes.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

22

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Quebec
      • Montréal, Quebec, Canada, H1T 2M4
        • Hopital Maisonneuve-Rosemont

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Poeple having general anesthesia at HMR

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient having general anesthesia in dorsal decubitus with both arm available for at least an hour and a half

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age >75 or <18
  • Neuromuscular disease
  • difficult laryngoscopy predicted
  • Allergy to rocuronium
  • Malignant hyperthermia
  • Full stomach
  • Drugs the influence neuromuscular blockers
  • Decision of the clinician to exclude his patient

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Patient-control
on one side, we do a post-tetanic count, on the other side we don't, after, we do train-of-four on both sides and check the difference

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
The difference at 30 minutes after the post-tetanic count between the TOF% in both arms, we expect a difference of more than 10%

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
The difference at 30 minutes after the post-tetanic count on the T1% (of the calibrated T1) in both arms, we expect a difference of more than 10%
The difference of the slope of recuperation on TOF and T1% after a post-tetanic count vs the control arm that had no tetanic stimulation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2010

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

April 1, 2010

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

April 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 10, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 11, 2010

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

March 12, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

April 27, 2010

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 26, 2010

Last Verified

March 1, 2010

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • MaisonneuveRH-09092

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Post-tetanic Count on One Arm, the Other Arm is the Control

Clinical Trials on NMT (a device that can do neurostimulation and can record the response on the stimulation by Datex)

3
Subscribe