An Observational Study Evaluating Therapy Optimisation Using High-frequency and High-dosage Administration of Interferon-beta (Rebif®) in Multiple Sclerosis (MS) Patients

July 11, 2014 updated by: Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany

Therapy Optimisation Using High-frequency and High-dosage Administration of Interferon-beta (Rebif®) in MS Patients. Case Series for Adjustment of Treatment Strategy and Its Monitoring

This was an observational, single arm, multicentric study conducted for the adjustment of treatment strategy and its monitoring using high-frequency and high-dosage administration of interferon-beta (Rebif) in MS subjects. Study focussed on assessment of the effectiveness and safety of existing immunomodulatory basis therapy in MS subjects.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Treatment of MS, which progresses to attacks or episodes, with interferon-beta has established itself as therapy of the first choice. On the basis of different studies, the hypothesis was substantiated that the effectiveness is dependent on dose and application frequency. These realizations justify the use of high-dose interferon-beta not only in subjects in the initial stages of disease, but also in those subjects, who have a progressing disease activity even in the advanced stage, if other therapies fail. For achieving maximum benefit for the subject, an optimum therapy is imperative. The therapy plan (Immunomodulatory Therapy) of "MS Therapy Consensus Group" (MSTKG) is being widely used. In the article: "Optimising lmmunomodulatory Therapy for MS Patients" that appeared in the "International Journal of MS care" in the year 2002, a simple 9-scale model" is proposed that defines four areas respectively: not conspicuous, conspicuous, alarming and measures are necessary, in the three areas: attacks/episodes, disease progression and magnetic resonance tomography (MRT). The modification of an existing therapy, such as modifying the application plan, increasing the dosage, or substance change is recommended, if 'conspicuousness' is shown in all three areas, two areas are shown as 'alarming' or an area is shown as 'action necessary'. The decision for a therapy adjustment with the help of the "three scale model" should not happen solely on the results of the MRT. The model in the study involved attack or episode pertaining to: frequency, degree of severity, ability of involution and the response to a cortisone pulse therapy.

OBJECTIVES

  • To assess the effectiveness and safety of existing immunomodulatory basis therapy in MS subjects
  • To identify candidates suitable for possible therapy adjustment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

231

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Subjects with clinically ensured diagnosis and history of attacks or episodes of a MS and on one of the permitted basis therapies at least since 6 months were enrolled for the case series

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects with clinically ensured diagnosis of a MS and history of attacks or episodes
  • Subjects who were on one of the permitted basis therapies at least since 6 months
  • Subjects with existing systemic concurrent diseases (e.g.diabetes, heart, liver, kidney diseases) should be monitored very carefully.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects with secondary progressive course of the MS without attacks or episodes, pregnant or nursing subjects as well as subjects with history of contraindications

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The course of the therapy, the assessment of the effectiveness, safety and compatibility were documented over the observation period
Time Frame: Beginning to 12 months observation period
Subject's therapy status was assessed with the help of a ready-made evaluation sheet, modified according to the so-called "Scale Model"
Beginning to 12 months observation period

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2005

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 10, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 10, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

June 11, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 14, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 11, 2014

Last Verified

June 1, 2010

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis

Clinical Trials on Interferon beta 1a

3
Subscribe