A Study to Evaluate the Effects of Milnacipran on Pain Processing and Functional MRI in Patients With Fibromyalgia

October 4, 2017 updated by: Daniel Clauw, MD, University of Michigan

A Randomized, Double-blind,Placebo-controlled, Two-way Crossover Study to Evaluate the Effect of Milnacipran on Pain Processing and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Activation Patterns in Patients With Fibromyalgia

Fibromyalgia is a condition that includes pain, tenderness, stiff muscle, and fatigue. Researchers want to find out if "a drug" called milnacipran can help people with fibromyalgia. milnacipran (Savella) is approved by the FDA for the management of fibromyalgia. In this study, milnacipran will be given to find out more about how it affects pain and thinking in people with fibromyalgia.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of milnacipran on pain processing in patients with fibromyalgia and to assess the correlation between this effect and neural activation patterns during functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI).

NOTE regarding Changes in Outcome Measures

In this Crossover Study, participants were involved for approximately 16 weeks in this sequence: a week of preparing for the initial assessments, baseline measurements (Week 0), 6 weeks on placebo or study drug followed by measurements for effect of drug or placebo (Week 6); a week of titration off of drug, if appropriate (or continued placebo, if on placebo), two weeks of washout, a new baseline assessment (Week 9), six weeks of study drug (or placebo), another set of measurements for effect of drug or placebo (Week 15), and a final titration period to maintain masking of assignment to drug or placebo. Of 17 participants who completed both sequences, data was analyzed for the 15 whose values for all measurement variables were usable.

When Outcome measure data was originally and accurately posted for baseline and change after treatment, the time frames listed were 0 and 15 weeks, because the last assessment was gathered at approximately week 15 for each person whose data is in the data set. However, given the crossover design, it seems more accurate and understandable, to show the time frame for the outcome measure as 6 because the participants were each administered drug or placebo for six weeks total. (Of course for the Placebo then Study Drug arm, the placebo data was collected at week 6, and for the Study Drug then Placebo arm, the drug data was collected at week 6, and similarly for the first group the drug data was collected at week 15 (first assignment, plus 1 week titration, 2 weeks washout, new baseline at week 9, and final collection at week 15), and for the second group the placebo data was collected at week 15.

Thus, outcome measures originally listed for 6 and 9 weeks, which were previously shown as "Data Not Reported" were effectively already included within the data presented for change from baseline shown in Week 15 in this fashion: 9 week data for the second assignment is part of the "week 0 data" for the first assignment, to get pre-treatment baseline for each treatment shown. Week 6 data is the post-treatment data which was shown as week 15, but is now recategorized as 6 week data. There is no, and never was, any data that could represent assignment to drug or placebo for 9 or 15 weeks.

Additionally, several outcome measures based on fMRI values were always listed in the protocol as other outcomes (not secondary outcomes), but had been incorrectly posted in the earlier listings on ClinicalTrials.gov. They have been accurately reclassified in the 2017 resubmission.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

22

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48106
        • University of Michigan, Chronic Pain and Fatigue Research Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 68 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • You may be eligible to take part in this study if the following are true:

    • You are between the age of 18 and 70 years
    • If you are female
    • If you are right handed
    • You have a diagnosis of fibromyalgia for at least 3 months, as defined by the American College of Rheumatology 1990 Criteria
    • You are willing to stop taking certain medicines that you may be taking on a regular basis. The researchers will discuss these medications with you in detail

Exclusion Criteria:

  • You may not be eligible take part in this study if any of the following are true for you:

    • You have problems with your heart or cardiovascular system
    • You have problems with your liver or kidneys
    • You have an autoimmune disease, or a whole-body infection like HIV or hepatitis
    • You have cancer
    • You are pregnant or breastfeeding
    • You abuse drugs or alcohol
    • You have suicidal thoughts or wishes
    • You have taken milnacipran or another study drug within the last 30 days
    • You have a medical problem not listed here that would make it unsafe for you to take part in the study
    • The research team feels that you will be unable to complete all phases of the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Milnacipran
Milnacipran will be given orally twice daily in tablet form at different times during the course of the study. The highest dose of milnacipran to be used in the study is 200mg/day.
Milnacipran will be given orally twice daily in tablet form at different times during the course of the study. The highest dose of milnacipran to be used in the study is 200mg/day.
Other Names:
  • Savella
Experimental: Placebo
Placebo will be given orally twice daily in tablet form at different times during the course of the study.
Placebo will be given orally twice daily in tablet form at different times during the course of the study.
Other Names:
  • placebo/sugar pill

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Threshold at Baseline
Time Frame: Baselines measured at week 0 and week 9 after washout from first assignment to treatment
The primary outcome parameter is the medium pressure pain threshold at pre-treatment baseline (pressure that evokes a perceived pain intensity of 40-50 out of 100 on a numerical rating scale). Measured in kg/cm^2.
Baselines measured at week 0 and week 9 after washout from first assignment to treatment
Change in Pain Threshold From Baseline to End of Treatment.
Time Frame: baseline compared with 6 weeks of treatment
The primary outcome parameter is the change in medium pressure pain threshold (pressure that evokes a perceived pain intensity of 40-50 out of 100 on a numerical rating scale) from baseline to end of treatment. Measured in kg/cm^2. Lower values represent a worse outcome.
baseline compared with 6 weeks of treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diffuse Noxious Inhibitory Control (DNIC) Effect at Baseline.
Time Frame: Baselines measured at week 0 and week 9 after washout from first assignment to treatment
0-100 numerical rating scale. 0 on the numerical scale represents a better outcome. 100 represents a worse outcome.
Baselines measured at week 0 and week 9 after washout from first assignment to treatment
Change in Diffuse Noxious Inhibitory Control (DNIC) Effect From Baseline to End of Treatment.
Time Frame: baseline compared with 6 weeks of treatment
0-100 numerical rating scale. 0 on the numerical scale represents a better outcome. 100 represents a worse outcome.
baseline compared with 6 weeks of treatment
Pain Tolerance at Baseline
Time Frame: Baselines measured at week 0 and week 9 after washout from first assignment to treatment
The primary outcome parameter is the pressure pain tolerance (maximum tolerated pressure) at pre-treatment baseline.
Baselines measured at week 0 and week 9 after washout from first assignment to treatment
Change in Pain Tolerance From Baseline to End of Treatment
Time Frame: baseline compared wtih 6 weeks of treatment
The primary outcome parameter is the change in pressure pain tolerance (maximum tolerated pressure) from baseline to end of treatment. Measured in kg/cm^2. Lower values represent a worse outcome.
baseline compared wtih 6 weeks of treatment

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change in fMRI Brain Activation Patterns During Pressure Stimulation From Baseline to End of Treatment
Time Frame: Baselines measured at week 0 and week 9 after washout from first assignment to treatment; treatment effect measures collected 6 weeks later
Baselines measured at week 0 and week 9 after washout from first assignment to treatment; treatment effect measures collected 6 weeks later
Change in Descending Pain Modulation From Baseline to End of Treatment (as Assessed by Changes in fMRI Brainstem Activation Patterns)
Time Frame: Baselines measured at week 0 and week 9 after washout from first assignment to treatment; treatment effect measures collected 6 weeks later
Baselines measured at week 0 and week 9 after washout from first assignment to treatment; treatment effect measures collected 6 weeks later
Change in fMRI Activation Patterns During N-back Procedure From Baseline to End of Treatment.
Time Frame: Baselines measured at week 0 and week 9 after washout from first assignment to treatment; treatment effect measures collected 6 weeks later
Baselines measured at week 0 and week 9 after washout from first assignment to treatment; treatment effect measures collected 6 weeks later

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Daniel Clauw, MD, University of Michigan

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 29, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 29, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

July 30, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 8, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 4, 2017

Last Verified

October 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Fibromyalgia

Clinical Trials on milnacipran

3
Subscribe