Impact of Vitamin D Repletion in Hemodialysis Patients

September 15, 2014 updated by: Anita Mehrotra MD, Mehrotra, Anita, M.D.

Immunologic Impact of Vitamin D Repletion in Hemodialysis Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Dialysis patients often suffer from defects in their immune system (that part of the body which fights infection). Evidence suggests that Vitamin D deficiency may have a negative effect on immunity, and many dialysis patients are deficient in Vitamin D. We believe that by giving Vitamin D to dialysis patients who are deficient, we may help improve their immune system. This study will test that idea.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Innate and adaptive immunity are commonly impaired in patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD) on dialysis. The myriad of immune defects in these patients, often attributed to uremia, may account for their high risk of bacterial infection and suboptimal responses to vaccination. The mechanisms underlying these abnormalities in immune function remain elusive, but emerging evidence indicates that 25OH-Vitamin D exerts potent and complex control over innate and adaptive immunity. Vitamin D deficiency is common in dialysis patients, and the immune effects associated with 25OH-Vit D deficiency overlap with those found in many dialysis patients. The kidney is the dominant site of 1-alpha-hydroxylase activity required for producing active 1,25OH-Vit D; however, immune cells also express the 1-alpha-hydroxylase enzyme. Evidence indicates the effects of Vitamin D on modulating immunity require conversion of 25OH-Vit D to 1,25OH-Vit D within the immune cells (rather than via circulating 1,25OH-Vit D). As a consequence, total body deficiency of 25OH-Vit D can impact immune function despite ongoing therapy with active 1,25OH-Vit D (which most dialysis patients are receiving). Our preliminary data confirm the high prevalence of 25OH-Vit D deficiency in dialysis patients and show that Th1 T cell alloimmunity is stronger in patients deficient in 25OH-Vit D, supporting the hypothesis that Vit D deficiency has important immunological consequences. Based on the published literature and our preliminary data, we hypothesize that repletion of 25OH-Vit D enhances immunity in dialysis patients. To test this hypothesis, we propose a randomized controlled trial of oral 25OH-Vit D repletion in this patient population. One hundred fifty 25OH-Vit D deficient study subjects will be randomized to either treatment with 50,000 IU oral 25OH-Vit D weekly or no treatment (standard of care). The primary outcome of change in 25OH-Vit D level will be measured at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months. Secondary outcomes to be measured include change in peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) profile by flow cytometry at 6 and 12 months, change in ELISPOT-based panel of reactive T cell (PRT) readout at 6 and 12 months, change in PMBC cytokine production in response to toll-like-receptor stimulation at 6 and 12 months, and response to influenza vaccination.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

116

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10029
        • Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age > 18 years
  2. Chronic hemodialysis treatments for at least 2 consecutive months
  3. 25OH-Vitamin D level < 25 ng/mL (inclusion criteria for randomization)

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. History of acute renal failure requiring dialysis with potential for renal recovery
  2. History of HIV/AIDS
  3. Inability to provide informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: No treatment (standard of care)
Patients will be randomized in a 3:2 ratio to oral Vitamin D treatment, or standard of care (no repletion).
Experimental: Vitamin D repletion
Patients will be randomized in a 3:2 ratio to oral Vitamin D treatment, or standard of care (no repletion).
50,000 IU PO weekly x 6 weeks
Other Names:
  • Vitamin D

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in 25OH-Vitamin D Level
Time Frame: 1 year
Vitamin D deficient study subjects will be randomized to either treatment with 50,000 IU oral 25OH-Vit D weekly or no treatment (standard of care). The primary outcome of change in 25OH-Vit D level will be measured at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months.
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Immune Parameters
Time Frame: 1 year
Secondary outcomes to be measured include change in peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) profile by flow cytometry at 6 and 12 months, change in ELISPOT-based panel of reactive T cell (PRT) readout at 6 and 12 months, change in PMBC cytokine production in response to toll-like-receptor stimulation at 6 and 12 months, and response to influenza vaccination.
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Anita Mehrotra, MD, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 3, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 3, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

August 5, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 22, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 15, 2014

Last Verified

September 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Vitamin D Deficiency

Clinical Trials on Cholecalciferol

3
Subscribe