Dydrogesterone Versus Intravaginal Progesterone in the Luteal Phase Support

January 27, 2014 updated by: Vlatka Tomic, University of Zagreb

Oral Dydrogesterone Versus Vaginal Progesterone Gel in the Luteal Phase Support: Randomized Controlled Trial

The purpose of this study is to compare efficacy and tolerability of the dydrogesterone and the vaginal progesterone, used for luteal phase support.

(Initial start date was January 2009 but not for patients' recruitment only for paper work, documents, team organization, statistical pre-work actions and to gain the official approval of Institutional Review Board. The recruitment started in October 2010 and continued until October 2013.)

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists in the ovarian stimulation, which prevents a premature surge of luteal hormone (LH), ultimately leads to suppression of the pituitary gland and high levels of estrogen observed during induced cycles result in inhibiting effect on the implantation of human embryos.

The luteal support in in-vitro-fertilization (IVF) cycles can be prolonged using human chorion gonadotropin(hCG) and/or progesterone.

Since it has been noted that the use of hCG was related with higher risks of the onset of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), progesterone is nowadays a product of choice in luteal support.

Currently vaginal progesterone is widely used, since the classic oral progesterone results in low bioavailability and lower pregnancy rate and the intramuscular progesterone (IM-P) daily injections are painful and may cause abscesses, inflammatory reactions and local soreness.

However, standard protocol for luteal phase support has not been established (i.e. optimal dosage, route or duration).

Dydrogesterone is a retroprogesterone with good oral bioavailability. Oral administration is clear advantage, due to expected higher patient compliance and better tolerability than currently used vaginal or IM-P.

We hypothesize that dydrogesterone has the same efficacy as vaginal progesterone but better tolerability due to less side effects.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

853

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Zagreb, Croatia, 10000
        • University Hospital Center Sisters of Mercy

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 45 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • routine ovulation induction protocol with GnRH agonist
  • less than three prior IVF cycles
  • at least three aspirated oocytes
  • BMI <35 kg/m2
  • age <45 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • history of dysfunctional uterine bleeding
  • acute urogenital disease
  • recurrent miscarriage
  • previous allergic reactions to a progesterone products

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Oral dydrogesterone
Study group receiving 2x10mg of oral dydrogesterone until a pregnancy test or in the case of pregnancy until 10 week.
oral-2x10mg
Other Names:
  • Duphastone (Solvay Pharmaceuticals)
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Crinone 8% vaginal gel
Control group is receiving vaginal gel, 1x90mg, until a pregnancy test or in the case of pregnancy until 10 week.
vaginal-1x90mg
Other Names:
  • Crinone 8% gel (Fleet Laboratories Ltd., Watford, UK)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Ongoing pregnancy rate
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Ongoing pregnancy rate is defined by the presence of gestational sac(s) with viable fetal heart beats at 12 weeks' gestation by transvaginal ultrasound.
12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of participants with adverse events
Time Frame: 10 weeks
The side effects included the occurrence of headache, somnolence, nausea, abdominal pain, bloating, dizziness, headache, breast fullness, perineal irritation, vaginal discharge and bleeding, interference with coitus.
10 weeks
Satisfaction
Time Frame: 10 weeks
Satisfaction score is determinate on the 5-point level scale with 1 being "absolutely satisfied" and 5 being "absolutely dissatisfied" and tolerability by yes and now answers regarding side effects that the supplements could cause.
10 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jozo Tomic, M.D., Department of Human Reproduction, University Hospital Center Sisters of Mercy
  • Study Chair: Vlatka Tomic, M.D., Department of Human Reproduction, University Hospital Center Sisters of Mercy

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2010

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

October 1, 2013

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 9, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 9, 2010

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

August 10, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

January 29, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 27, 2014

Last Verified

January 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Luteal Phase Defect

Clinical Trials on Oral dydrogesterone

3
Subscribe