Neurogenic Detrusor Overactivity Following Spinal Cord Injury or Multiple Sclerosis

September 15, 2022 updated by: Ipsen

A Phase IIa, Multicentre, Double Blind, Single Dose, Parallel Group, Placebo Controlled, Clinical Pilot Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of a Single Dose, Intra-Detrusor Injections of 750 Units of Dysport® in Subjects Suffering From Neurogenic Detrusor Overactivity Following Spinal Cord Injury or Multiple Sclerosis.

The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of a single dose of 750 U of Dysport compared to placebo for the improvement in the daily incontinence episode frequency for each administration mode in subjects suffering from neurogenic detrusor overactivity following spinal cord injury or multiple sclerosis.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

47

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Praha, Czechia
        • Faculty Hospital Motol
      • Praha, Czechia
        • THOMAYER Faculty Hospital
      • Garches, France
        • Hopital Raymond Poincare
      • Lille, France
        • Hopital HURIET
      • Lyon, France
        • Hôpital Lyon Sud -Hospices Civils de Lyon
      • Marseille, France
        • Hôpital de la Conception
      • Nantes, France
        • Chu Hotel Dieu
      • Paris, France
        • Hopital Tenon
      • Paris, France
        • Groupe Hospitalier La Pitié Salpêtrière
      • Ploemeur, France
        • CMRRF Kerpape
      • Rouen, France
        • CHU ROUEN - Hôpital Charles Nicolle
      • Strasbourg, France
        • Nouvel Hôpital Civil de Strasbourg
      • Toulouse, France
        • CHU Toulouse - Hôpital Rangueil
      • Kiel, Germany
        • Universitätsklinik Kiel
      • Neunkirchen, Germany
        • Städtisches Klinikum Neunkirchen
      • Firenze, Italy
        • Ospedale Careggi
      • Warszawa, Poland
        • NZOZ Centrum Medyczne Mazovia

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subject, family member or care giver was willing and able to perform clean intermittent catheterisation (CIC) for the duration of the study
  • Inadequate response or refractory to anticholinergic medication
  • Botulinum Toxin naive for intradetrusor injections and with no previous treatment with Botulinum Toxin of any type, within 3 months prior to study entry for any other condition
  • Have a minimum of 2 incontinences per day calculated as the average daily incontinence episode frequency (IEF) over the 3 days preceding the baseline visit

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Significant Baseline renal and/or urinary tract pathology
  • Previous treatment with any endovesical pharmacology agent including detrusor Botulinum Toxin injection

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Dysport 750 U (15 injection sites)
750 U intra detrusor injection on Day 1 (single dose)
Other Names:
  • AbobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport®)
Placebo Comparator: Placebo (15 injection sites)
Intra detrusor injection on Day 1 (single dose)
Experimental: Dysport 750 U (30 injection sites)
750 U intra detrusor injection on Day 1 (single dose)
Other Names:
  • AbobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport®)
Placebo Comparator: Placebo (30 injection sites)
Intra detrusor injection on Day 1 (single dose)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Daily Incontinence Episode Frequency (IEF)
Time Frame: Baseline and Day 84
Baseline and Day 84

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Urodynamics: Maximum Cystometric Capacity
Time Frame: Baseline, Days 14, 42 and 84
Maximum Cystometric Capacity is an urodynamic parameter that indicates the volume at which a patient feels he (she) can no longer delay release of urine from the urinary bladder. Baseline urodynamics exams done at screening visit.
Baseline, Days 14, 42 and 84
Urodynamics:Maximum Detrusor Pressure
Time Frame: Baseline, Days 14, 42 and 84
Maximum Detrusor Pressure is an urodynamic parameter that is the maximum value of the pressure within the bladder which is measured during the filling phase of the urodynamic exam. Baseline urodynamics exams done at screening visit.
Baseline, Days 14, 42 and 84
Physician's Global Assessment Score of Treatment Response
Time Frame: Day 14
The subject's treatment response was assessed by the physician and graded as 'markedly worse', 'much worse', 'worse', 'slightly worse', 'no change', 'slightly improved', 'improved', 'much improved', or 'markedly improved'.
Day 14
Physician's Global Assessment Score of Treatment Response
Time Frame: Day 42
The subject's treatment response was assessed by the physician and graded as 'markedly worse', 'much worse', 'worse', 'slightly worse', 'no change', 'slightly improved', 'improved', 'much improved', or 'markedly improved'.
Day 42
Physician's Global Assessment Score of Treatment Response
Time Frame: Day 84
The subject's treatment response was assessed by the physician and graded as 'markedly worse', 'much worse', 'worse', 'slightly worse', 'no change', 'slightly improved', 'improved', 'much improved', or 'markedly improved'.
Day 84
Quality of Life (QoL) Total Summary Score
Time Frame: Baseline, 14, 42 and 84

Mean Change from Baseline in Short Form (SF)-Qualiveen Questionnaire Calculated Total Score.

The SF-Qualiveen questionnaire is a specific health related QoL questionnaire validated for urinary disorders in subjects with neurological conditions containing 8 items looking at four scales: limitations (2 items); constraints (2 items); fears (2 items) and feelings (2 items). The 8 items each having a 5-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0="Not at all" to 4="Extremely" for the first 6 items, from 0="Never" to 4="Always" for item 7 and from 0="Always" to 4="Never" for item 8. The score per scale has been calculated as the mean of the two items. In case of one missing item among the 2 items for a given scale, the score has not been calculated.

Total score has been calculated as the mean of all the items completed among the 8 items.

Lower scores indicate a better QoL (i.e. no limitations, fears, constraints, or negative feelings) and higher scores indicate poorer QoL.

Baseline, 14, 42 and 84
Pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score: Before Treatment Injection
Time Frame: Baseline
Pain assessment using the VAS. The VAS is a 100-mm (10-cm) scoring scale. Score range on VAS is from 0 to 100 where zero [0] indicates no pain and 100 indicates worst possible pain.
Baseline
Pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score: During Treatment Injection Procedure
Time Frame: Baseline
Pain assessment using the VAS. The VAS is a 100-mm (10-cm) scoring scale. Score range on VAS is from 0 to 100 where zero [0] indicates no pain and 100 indicates worst possible pain.
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 17, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 20, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

May 23, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 27, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 15, 2022

Last Verified

September 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Qualified researchers may request access to patient level data and related study documents including the clinical study report, study protocol with any amendments, annotated case report form, statistical analysis plan, and dataset specifications. Patient level data will be anonymized, and study documents will be redacted to protect the privacy of study participants.

Any requests should be submitted to www.vivli.org for assessment by an independent scientific review board.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Where applicable, data from eligible studies are available 6 months after the studied medicine and indication have been approved in the US and EU or after the primary manuscript describing the results has been accepted for publication, whichever is later.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Further details on Ipsen's sharing criteria, eligible studies and process for sharing are available here (https://vivli.org/members/ourmembers/).

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Detrusor Muscle Hyperactivity

Clinical Trials on Botulinum toxin type A

Subscribe