- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01499966
Comparison of Plaster of Paris Against Tubigrip for the Treatment of Lateral Ankle Sprains (POPTuLAS)
December 23, 2011 updated by: Liaquat National Hospital & Medical College
Assessment of Tubigrip Versus Plaster of Paris in the Treatment of Grade 1 and 2 Lateral Ankle Sprains
Until now very few studies have been done to compare the efficacy of tubigrips or plaster of paris in the treatment of lateral ankle sprains, the investigators aim to compare the tubigrip against plaster of paris in the treatment of lateral ankle sprains.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
200 patients were enrolled after meeting inclusion criteria.All patients gave the verbal as well as written consent for inclusion in the study.
The hospital committee ethical review board gave the permission for this study.
Only 126 patients agreed to participate in the study.
After informed consent was obtained the patients were randomized such that each patient was allocated to use either a Tubigrip (Group A) or Plaster of Paris (Group B)using the Block randomization.
The patients in TG group receive the Tubigrip treatment and the patients in POP group were given a below knee plaster cast.
Patients were instructed to follow up at 2 weeks and then at 6 weeks.
The functional score and pain were used as outcomes of the study
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
200
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Sindh
-
Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan, 74200
- Liaquat National Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 40 years (ADULT)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- age 18-40 years
- grade 1 and 2 ankle sprains
- permanent residents in place of study
- no concomitant bone pathology
- have not been recruited in other trial simultaneously
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with age <18 years
- injury >48 hours, fractures
- multiple injuries
- any neurological or musculoskeletal illness
- any co-morbid associated with long term disabilities
- grade 3 lateral ankle sprains
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: NONE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
EXPERIMENTAL: group POP
PLASTER OF PARIS
|
After informed consent was obtained the patients were randomized such that each patient was allocated to use either a Tubigrip (Group A) or Plaster of Paris (Group B).
The standardized treatment in the form of RICE (Rest, Ice, Compression and Elevation) protocol was given to all patients.
The Patients were randomized using the Block randomization.
One hundred and twenty six white papers were taken and "TG" for Tubigrip and "POP" for Plaster of Paris were written and the patients were allowed to pick the envelope of their choice.
The authors were blinded till the opening of the envelope by the patients.
Patient's usage of analgesia in form of Paracetamol was specifically noted.
The patients in TG group receive the Tubigrip treatment and the patients in POP group were given a below knee plaster cast.
Patients were instructed to follow up at 2 weeks and then at 6 weeks
|
EXPERIMENTAL: TG
TUBIGRIP
|
After informed consent was obtained the patients were randomized such that each patient was allocated to use either a Tubigrip (Group A) or Plaster of Paris (Group B).
The standardized treatment in the form of RICE (Rest, Ice, Compression and Elevation) protocol was given to all patients.
The Patients were randomized using the Block randomization.
One hundred and twenty six white papers were taken and "TG" for Tubigrip and "POP" for Plaster of Paris were written and the patients were allowed to pick the envelope of their choice.
The authors were blinded till the opening of the envelope by the patients.
Patient's usage of analgesia in form of Paracetamol was specifically noted.
The patients in TG group receive the Tubigrip treatment and the patients in POP group were given a below knee plaster cast.
Patients were instructed to follow up at 2 weeks and then at 6 weeks
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
---|---|
pain, karlsson score
Time Frame: 6 weeks
|
6 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Investigators
- Study Chair: Zaki Idrees, FRCS, Liaquat National Hospital
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
January 1, 2011
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
July 1, 2011
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
September 1, 2011
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
October 31, 2011
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
December 23, 2011
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
December 26, 2011
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)
December 26, 2011
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
December 23, 2011
Last Verified
December 1, 2011
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- NRahimnajjad
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Ankle Injuries
-
Hadassah Medical OrganizationCompleted
-
Oregon State UniversityTerminatedNeural Inhibition | Injuries, AnkleUnited States
-
Georgia State UniversityNational Athletic Trainers' Association Research & Education Foundation (NATA...CompletedChronic Ankle Instability | Ankle Sprains | Ankle RehabilitationUnited States
-
Direction Centrale du Service de Santé des ArméesRecruiting
-
MTI UniversityCairo UniversityCompleted
-
Sport and Spine Rehab Clinical Research FoundationCompletedAnkle SprainsUnited States
-
University of NebraskaWithdrawnAnkle Sprains | Ankle Injuries and Disorders
-
Petr RoutnerRecruitingAnkle Injuries | Ankle Fractures | Ankle Sprains | Ankle Edema | Ankle ImpingementCzechia
-
Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa (IUC)Not yet recruiting
-
Naveen PoonaiNot yet recruiting
Clinical Trials on Plaster of Paris/ Tubigrip
-
Kuwait Institute for Medical SpecializationKuwait UniversityRecruitingSplints | Ankle FracturesKuwait
-
IWK Health CentreCompletedSplints | Metacarpal Fracture | Bone Fractures | Boxer's FractureCanada
-
University of DuhokCompletedChildren, Only | Fracture Distal RadiusIraq
-
Alberta Children's HospitalCompletedClubfoot | Ponseti Method | Talipes Equinovarus | CastingCanada
-
St. Olavs HospitalNorwegian University of Science and TechnologyTerminated
-
Karolinska University HospitalRecruitingVenous Stasis | Deep Venous ThrombosisSweden
-
University Hospital, GhentWithdrawn
-
Mayo ClinicAirCast LLCTerminated
-
University Hospital, GhentCompletedWounds and Injuries | Ankle Fractures | Wrist Fractures | Elbow Fractures | Forearm Fractures | Foot FracturesBelgium