EASE TRICUSPID Expertise-based Assessment Study on Clinical Efficacy of Contour 3D® in TRICUSPID Valve Annuloplasty

November 16, 2017 updated by: Medtronic Bakken Research Center
Few clinical evidence for the Contour 3D Tricuspid Annuloplasty Ring exists; therefore, in order to position this product on the market, a post-market release study was completed. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the hemodynamic performance of the Contour 3D® Tricuspid Annuloplasty Ring following Tricuspid Valve (TV) repair in a post-market environment.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The EASE TRICUSPID Clinical Trial was a prospective, non-randomized, non-interventional, post-market release study. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the hemodynamic performance of the Contour 3D® Tricuspid Annuloplasty Ring following Tricuspid Valve (TV) repair in a post-market environment. Therefore, the primary objective of the EASE Tricuspid Study was to evaluate the hemodynamic performance of the Contour 3D® Tricuspid Annuloplasty Ring (Contour 3D ring) in subjects with tricuspid regurgitation who had a clinical indication for TV repair in a post-market use. Secondary objectives included the evaluation of the effect of TV repair with the Contour 3D ring on the right ventricular function, as well as the assessment of the effect of TV repair with the Contour 3D ring on the functional status in subjects undergoing TV repair in a post-market environment. Subjects eligible for TV repair and compliant with the enrollment criteria were considered by the Investigator for inclusion in the study. To minimize bias, enrolled subjects were followed by their own physician in accordance with the center's established practice for routine follow up. Follow-up sessions were planned at the physician's discretion. To meet the intended goals, appropriate clinical data were collected at baseline (pre-surgery), during the surgical procedure, at discharge and during the follow-up period at 6 months. Experienced echo-cardiologists evaluated the echos. At the time of enrollment it was not certain if the subject would receive a Contour 3D ring, since the surgeon might have decided during surgery that another treatment was more beneficial to the subject. In this case, the subject was terminated from the study.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

85

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Lyon, France, 69500
        • Hôpital de Lyon - Hôpital Louis Pradel
      • Mulhouse, France, 68100
        • Centre Hospitalier de Mulhouse
      • Hamburg, Germany, 22457
        • Albertinen Herz- und Gefäßzentrum
      • Lübeck, Germany, 23562
        • Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein
      • Munich, Germany, D-80636
        • Deutsches Herzzentrum München
      • Be'er Sheeva, Israel, 84101
        • Soroka Medical Center
      • Jerusalem, Israel
        • Shaare Zedek Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The patient population includes all patients indicated for a TV repair procedure concomitantly to left-sided heart surgery, and for whom the surgeon considers the implantation of a Contour 3D® Tricuspid Annuloplasty Ring most appropriate to reconstruct the diseased valve. Patients with primary TV are not included, since this is often characterized by pathological leaflets for which the Contour 3D® Tricuspid Annuloplasty Ring would not be beneficial.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Willing to sign and date the Patient Informed Consent (PIC)
  • Indicated for a concomitant surgical repair of the TV
  • Willing to return to the hospital, where the implantation originally occurred, for a 6 month follow-up visit

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a degenerative TV condition
  • Patients with primary TV regurgitation
  • Previous TV repair or replacement
  • Stand-alone TV repair
  • Already participating in another investigational device or drug study, possibly leading to bias and jeopardizing the scientific appropriate assessment of the study endpoints
  • Life expectancy of less than one year
  • Pregnant or desire to be pregnant within 12 months of the study treatment
  • Under 18 years or over 85 years of age
  • Patients with active endocarditis
  • Patients with valvular retraction with severely reduced mobility
  • Patients with a heavily calcified TV

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Subjects with Tricuspid Valve Repair
All patients indicated for a Tricuspid Valve (TV) repair procedure concomitantly to left-sided heart surgery, and for whom the surgeon considers the implantation of a Contour 3D® Tricuspid Annuloplasty Ring most appropriate to reconstruct the diseased valve.
Tricuspid valve repair was with the study device was only warranted if concomitant left-sided heart surgery was planned
Contour 3D Tricuspid Annuloplasty procedure was used during the tricuspid valve repair

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Gradient Across the Tricuspid Valve
Time Frame: At Baseline, Discharge (up to 5 days post-implant) and 6 months post-implant
The mean gradient across the Tricuspid Valve (TV) measured via echocardiography at discharge (up to 5 days post-implant) through 6 months post-implant
At Baseline, Discharge (up to 5 days post-implant) and 6 months post-implant
Change in the Degree of Tricuspid Regurgitation From Baseline Through Discharge (up to 5 Days Post-implant) and 6 Months Post-implant
Time Frame: Baseline to Discharge (up to 5 days post-implant) and through 6 months post-implant
Change in the degree of tricuspid regurgitation measured via echocardiography from Baseline through 6 months post-implant. The severity of tricuspid regurgitation is graded by using several qualitative and quantitative methods. The degree of regurgitation is classified as "none", "Mild", "Moderate" or "Severe".
Baseline to Discharge (up to 5 days post-implant) and through 6 months post-implant
Change in Tricuspid Valve (TV) Leaflet Coaptation Length From Baseline Through 6 Months Post-implant
Time Frame: Baseline to Discharge (up to 5 days post-implant) and to 6 months post-implant
Change in the degree of TV leaflet coaptation length measured via echocardiography from Baseline through 6 months post-implant
Baseline to Discharge (up to 5 days post-implant) and to 6 months post-implant
Change in the Degree of Tricuspid Valve (TV) Leaflet Tethering Height From Baseline Through 6 Months Post-implant
Time Frame: Baseline to Discharge (up to 5 days post-implant) and 6 months post-implant
Change in the degree of TV leaflet tethering height measured via echocardiography from Baseline through 6 months post-implant
Baseline to Discharge (up to 5 days post-implant) and 6 months post-implant

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in the Right Ventricle (RV) Diastolic Area From Baseline Through 6 Months Post-implant
Time Frame: Basline to Discharge (up to 5 days post-implant) and 6 months post-implant
Basline to Discharge (up to 5 days post-implant) and 6 months post-implant
Change in the Tricuspid Annular Diameter Measured at Diastole From Baseline Through 6 Months Post-implant
Time Frame: Baseline to Discharge (up to 5 days post-implant) and 6 months post-implant
Baseline to Discharge (up to 5 days post-implant) and 6 months post-implant
Change in the Right Ventricle (RV) Fractional Area From Baseline Through 6 Months Post-implant
Time Frame: Baseline to Discharge (up to 5 days post-implant) and 6 months post-implant
Baseline to Discharge (up to 5 days post-implant) and 6 months post-implant
Change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification From Baseline Through 6 Months Post-implant
Time Frame: Baseline to Discharge (up to 5 days post-implant) and 6 months post-implant
The New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification provides a simple way of classifying the extent of heart failure. It places patients in one of four categories based on how much they are limited during physical activity; the limitations/symptoms are in regard to normal breathing and varying degrees in shortness of breath and/or angina. NYHA I implies no limitations. NYHA II implies slight limitation of physical activity. NYHA III implies marked limitation of physical activity and finally, NYHA IV implies patients are Unable to carry on any physical activity without discomfort.
Baseline to Discharge (up to 5 days post-implant) and 6 months post-implant

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2011

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2016

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 10, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 10, 2012

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

February 15, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

August 10, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 16, 2017

Last Verified

November 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • EASE TRICUSPID

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Tricuspid Valve Insufficiency

Clinical Trials on Tricuspid valve repair

3
Subscribe