The Value of PET/CT in Diagnosing Residual Disease in Patients With Spinal Infection

February 15, 2013 updated by: Michala Kehrer, MD, Odense University Hospital

Preliminary Study. The Value of 18F-FDG PET/CT Compared to MRI in Diagnosing Residual Disease in Patients With Spondylodiscitis

MRI has shoved little correlation with the clinical finding during treatment of spondylodiscitis (infection in the vertebrae and/or discs). Since PET/CT is almost as good as MRI in diagnosing spondylodiscitis the hypothesis and this study is that PET/CT is better in predicting residual disease in patients with spondylodiscitis.

Preliminary study.

Study Overview

Status

Suspended

Conditions

Detailed Description

In the last years there has been reported increasing incidence of spondylodiscitis. The increase is mainly thought to be caused by the increasing elderly population and the increasing amount of spinal instrumentation in this population. The symptoms range from backache to severe neurological deficits. Up to 1/3 of cases are reported to be culture negative and cases can therefore be difficult to diagnose.

MRI is thought to be the main imaging technique to visualise infection. But with the increasing availability of 18-F FDG PET/CT, it is reported to be nearly as efficient to diagnose spinal infection.

During the long antibiotic treatment of spondylodiscitis, the clinicians have no real good imaging technique to predict residual disease since MRI during the remodelling fase of the spine will mimic no difference or worsening.

Since 18-F-FDG PET marks areas with a high amount of inflammatory cells it may also be faster in returning to normal images and therefore correlates better to actual status than MRI.

Some of the purposes of this study are therefore:

  • To describe changes on PET/CT and MRI at index and after 4, 8 12 and 26 weeks and compare these to the clinical findings as well as inflammatory biomarkers.
  • To investigate the correlation between normalisation of inflammatory biomarkers and changes on MRI and PET/CT.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

10

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Odense, Denmark, 5000
        • Department of Nuclear Medicine, Odense University Hospital
      • Odense, Denmark, 5000
        • Department of radiology, Odense University Hospital
      • Odense C, Denmark, 5000
        • Department of Infectious Diseases, Odense University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

10 patients with MRI or PET/CT findings as well as overall clinical assessment compatible with spondylodiscitis.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • first case of infectious spondylodiscitis
  • MRI or 18-F-FDG PET/CT compatible with spondylodiscitis
  • overall assessment compatible with spondylodiscitis

Exclusion Criteria:

  • previous spinal infection (e.g. spondylodiscitis; epidural abscess)
  • spinal operation in the previous 6 months
  • spinal foreign body
  • current malignant disease

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Court Pedersen, MD, DMSc, Department of Infectious Diseases, Odense University Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: michala Kehrer, MD, Department of infectious diseases, Odense University Hospital, Denmark

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2012

Study Completion (Anticipated)

March 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 27, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 1, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

March 2, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 18, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 15, 2013

Last Verified

February 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • spondylodiscitis-pilot

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spondylodiscitis

3
Subscribe