Exploratory Efficacy Study of Guaifenesin in Upper Back Pain

May 1, 2014 updated by: GlaxoSmithKline

A Proof of Principle Study to Explore the Utility of Guaifenesin in Upper Back Pain

Explore the clinical efficacy of 7-day treatment regimens of guaifenesin in order to investigate the evidence that guaifenesin is an effective treatment for upper back/neck/shoulder muscle spasm/stiffness and pain.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

78

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Fair Oaks, California, United States, 95628
        • MED Investigations
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92120
        • San Diego Sports Medicine and Family Health Center
    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45249
        • Radiant Research - Cincinnati
    • Texas
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78229
        • Radiant Research, Inc. - TX
    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84109
        • J. Lewis Research

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Paticipant presents with a new episode of acute upper back/neck/shoulder pain and muscle spasm that:

    1. is at least 30 days from previous episode.
    2. has an onset occurred within 48 hours of Visit 1.
    3. has symptoms consistent with a clinical diagnosis as per the physical examination at Visit 1.
    4. has a subject-rated muscle spasm score and a pain score of at least 40 out of 100 on a 100mm VAS.
  • Paticipant has a normal neurological examination.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Medical history: a) Paticipant has a known or suspected intolerance or hypersensitivity to guaifenesin or methocarbamol (or closely related compounds) or any of their stated ingredients. b) Paticipant has history of upper back pain with active hypersensitive spots - trigger point in the muscles of upper back/neck/shoulder/maxillofacial regions. c) Paticipant has a current or recent history of liver and/or kidney disease, neck/back/shoulder injuries, spinal disc disease, myocardial infarction (<12 months from Visit 1) and osteoporosis. d) Subjects have history of other chronic pain e.g. headache, osteoarthritis, arthritis, lower back pain etc.
  • Medications: a) Paticipant has used a muscle relaxant or narcotic within 2 weeks of Visit 1. b) Paticipant has used monoamine oxidase inhibitors or selegiline within 2 weeks of Visit 1 c) Currently using tricyclic antidepressants, lithium, anticoagulants, or tramadol.
  • Paticipant is involved in a workers compensation case.
  • Paticipant is unlikely to refrain from using analgesics, NSAIDs, and other muscle relaxants for the duration of the study, with the exception of cardioprotective doses of aspirin (i.e., ≤ 325 mg/day).
  • Paticipant is unlikely to refrain from physical therapy, massage therapy, acupuncture, heat treatment, spas, etc for the duration of the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Arm 1
Guaifenesin 1 tablet BID
high and low dose of Guaifenesin each given twice daily over a 4-day treatment period
Experimental: Arm 2
Guaifenesin 2 tablets BID
high and low dose of Guaifenesin each given twice daily over a 4-day treatment period
Placebo Comparator: Arm 3
Placebo 1 tablet BID
no active ingredient
Placebo Comparator: Arm 4
Placebo 2 tablets BID
no active ingredient

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Change From Baseline of Both AM and PM Spasm Assessment Scores
Time Frame: 7 Days
The score was measured as 'assessment at baseline' minus 'assessment after treatment' over 7 day period (mean of all AM and PM changes from baseline). Measurements were based on an 11 categorical Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) with a range from 0 - no spasm to 10 - unbearable spasm.
7 Days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Change From Baseline of Both AM and PM NRS Muscle Stiffness Assessment Scores
Time Frame: 7 Days
The score was measured as 'assessment at baseline' minus 'assessment after treatment' over 7 day period (mean of all AM and PM changes from baseline). Measurements were based on an 11 categorical Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) with a range from 0 - no stiffness to 10 - unbearable stiffness.
7 Days
Mean Change From Baseline of Both AM and PM NRS Tension Assessment Scores
Time Frame: 7 Days
The score was measured as 'assessment at baseline' minus 'assessment after treatment' over 7 day period (mean of all AM and PM changes from baseline). Measurements were based on an 11 categorical Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) with a range from 0 - no tension to 10 - unbearable tension.
7 Days
Mean Change From Baseline of Both AM and PM NRS Pain Assessment Scores
Time Frame: 7 Days
The score was measured as 'assessment at baseline' minus 'assessment after treatment' over 7 day period (mean of all AM and PM changes from baseline). Measurements were based on an 11 categorical Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) with a range from 0 - no pain to 10 - unbearable pain.
7 Days
Mean Change From Baseline of Both AM and PM NRS Discomfort Assessment Scores
Time Frame: 7 Days
The score was measured as 'assessment at baseline' minus 'assessment after treatment' over 7 day period (mean of all AM and PM changes from baseline). Measurements were based on an 11 categorical Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) with a range from 0 - no discomfort to 10 - unbearable discomfort.
7 Days
Muscle Relaxation Scores
Time Frame: 4 Days, 7 Days
The score was measured as mean of both AM and PM assessment scores at Days 4 and 7. Measurements were based on a 5 categorical scale: 0 - no relaxation, 1- a little relaxation, 2 - fair relaxation, 3 - good relaxation, 4 - complete muscle relaxation.
4 Days, 7 Days
Upper Back/Neck/Shoulder Pain Disability (Vernon-Mior) Index Scores
Time Frame: Before treatment, 4 Days, 7 Days
Vernon-Mior upper back/neck/shoulder components were assessed before the treatment and at Days 4 and 7. Each component (pain intensity, personal care, lifting, reading, headaches, concentration, work, driving, sleeping, and recreation) was assessed based on a 6-point categorical scale (1 to 6), with 1 being the most positive and 6 being the worst.
Before treatment, 4 Days, 7 Days
Global Assessment of Treatment Helpfulness (GATH)
Time Frame: 4 Days, 7 Days
Measured as an overall qualitative score on a 5 point categorical scale: 0-poor, 1-fair, 2-good, 3-very good and 4-excellent.
4 Days, 7 Days
Global Assessment of Sleep Disturbance (GASD)
Time Frame: 7 Days
Categorized after treatment as: 'decreased', 'increased' or 'stayed the same'.
7 Days
Global Assessment of Headache Frequency (GAHF)
Time Frame: 7 Days
Categorized after treatment as: 'decreased', 'increased' or 'stayed the same'.
7 Days
Global Assessment of Headache Intensity (GAHI)
Time Frame: 7 Days
Categorized after treatment as: 'decreased', 'increased' or 'stayed the same'.
7 Days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 22, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 22, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

March 26, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 3, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 1, 2014

Last Verified

March 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Upper Back Pain

Clinical Trials on Guaifenesin

Subscribe