Effect of Distal Needling on Knee Pain Using Acupuncture Techniques

March 20, 2022 updated by: Elyad Davidson, Hadassah Medical Organization

Comparison of Different Acupuncture Methods on Knee Pain

The purpose of this study is to test if specific therapeutic benefits of acupuncture are mostly attributable to contextual and psychosocial factors, such as patients' beliefs and expectations.The investigators propose using the 2 acupuncture methods, which refrains from inserting needles in the affected area, in order to evaluate the short-term and long-term efficacy of acupuncture in a clinical setting compared with placebo and compared with invasive needling that does not adhere to "correct" acupuncture rules.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The main novel features of this study:

  1. First aim to assess the effect of distal needling on knee pain
  2. Second aim to directly compare two acupuncture techniques, placebo, needling at "wrong" places and "correct" needling for knee pain

Advantages of the study compared to published data:

  1. Distal needling - enables assessment of range of motion (ROM) and pain level during needling.
  2. Both acupuncture systems rely on minimal questioning, which simplifies the patient-practitioner interactions.
  3. Exploratory studies in the clinic of DP show that it is possible to distinguish between "correct" and "incorrect" needling, at least in the short term. Long term effects have not been assessed yet.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

70

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Please Select
      • Jerusalem, Please Select, Israel, 91120
        • Hadassah Medical Organization

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients (> 18 years old), suffering chronic stable pain score >40 mm on 100 mm VAS of the knee due to patellar tendonitis.
  • Patients have had X-rays or other tests confirming they are not candidates for surgery nor are scheduled for steroid injections or hyaluronic acid injections within 8 weeks from the beginning of the study.
  • Adult patients (> 18 years old), two weeks after ACL reconstruction surgery (with or without meniscal involvement), with pain score >40 mm on 100 mm VAS of the knee (all patients at this stage have significant ROM limitation).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient refusal
  • Soldiers
  • Pregnancy
  • Morbid obesity
  • Diabetes
  • Peripheral vascular disease
  • Lower limb neurological deficit (such as multiple sclerosis, nerve palsy), other serious co-morbidity (including severe back pain or hip pain)
  • A history of prolonged or current steroid use
  • Received hyaluronic acid injections within the previous 3 months
  • Have needle phobia or allergy to sticking plaster.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: deep needle non-site specific
Active Comparator: contralateral elbow to the knee pain
Active Comparator: Energy of Living Systems Needling
Placebo Comparator: Sham acupuncture

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Effect of Distal Needling on Knee Pain Using Acupuncture Techniques
Time Frame: 2 years

Effect of Distal Needling on Knee Pain Using 4 different Acupuncture Techniques by:

  1. Pain measurement by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
  2. Range of motion (ROM)
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Elyad Davidson, MD, Hadassah Medical Organization

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 3, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 5, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

June 6, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 22, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 20, 2022

Last Verified

March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 007212-HNO-CTIL

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Complete Tear, Knee, Anterior Cruciate Ligament

3
Subscribe