OsseoScrew Versus Fenestrated Pedicle Screws Augmented With Polymethylmethacrylate (EVOLVE)

February 22, 2022 updated by: Alphatec Spine, Inc.

Expandable Pedicle Screws Versus Fenestrated Pedicle Screws Augmented With Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA): Complications and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Osteoporosis or Poor Bone Quality

The purpose of this clinical investigation was to collect clinical evidence of the safety and efficacy of the OsseoScrew System. The OsseoScrew System is intended to provide immobilization and stabilization of spinal segments in skeletally mature patients as an adjunct to fusion. The study was designed to compare the safety and efficacy of OsseoScrew compared to any other commercially available fenestrated pedicle screw system augmented with PMMA for posterior spinal fixation after surgical correction of spinal deformity or pathology.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

This was a randomized, open-label, controlled, multi-center study in which patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either the OsseoScrew or any commercially available fenestrated screw augmented with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) (Control group) for posterior spinal fixation after surgical correction of spinal deformity or pathology. The study was planned to include up to 150 skeletally mature patients with spinal instability and osteopenia at up to 10 sites. Patients were to return postoperatively at 6 weeks (± 2 weeks) and at 6, 12, and 24 months (± 2 months) for assessments.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

94

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Aalst, Belgium
        • O.L. Vrouwziekenhuis
      • Bruxelles, Belgium
        • ULB Hôpital Erasme
      • Bruxelles, Belgium
        • CHIREC du Clinique
      • Liege, Belgium
        • CHC St. Joseph
      • Koblenz, Germany
        • Katholisches Klinikum Koblenz - Montabaur/
      • Mainz, Germany
        • University Medical Center Mainz/
      • Rome, Italy
        • San Giovanni Addolorata Hospital
      • Gerona, Spain
        • Institut d'Assistència Sanitària
      • Leon, Spain
        • Hospital de Leon
      • Stanmore, United Kingdom
        • The Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

150 skeletally mature study subjects with spinal instability and osteopenia will be enrolled in the study. Subjects will be randomized 1:1 to the OsseoScrew or the control group.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. ≥ 18 years of age
  2. Spinal instability or deformity requiring fusion with instrumentation
  3. Osteopenia defined as (T-Score of less than -1.0)
  4. No response to nonoperative treatment modalities preceding enrollment.
  5. Subject is willing and able to provide informed consent and agrees to release medical information for purposes of this study and to return for scheduled follow-up evaluations

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Active systemic or local infection
  2. A life expectancy less than the study duration
  3. Autoimmune disorders
  4. Currently an alcohol, solvent, or drug abuser
  5. Psychiatric or cognitive impairment that, in the opinion of the investigator, would interfere with the subject's ability to comply with the study requirements
  6. History of allergies to any of the device components including but not limited to commercially pure titanium, titanium alloy, polymethylmethacrylate or Zirconium Oxide (ZrO2)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
OsseoScrew
Test Product: OsseoScrew Spinal Fixation System
Surgical intervention
Fenestrated Screw
Control Product: Any commercially available fenestrated screw system augmented with PMMA

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety Endpoint: Rate of device-related or PMMA-related complications
Time Frame: 24 months
The proportion of patients who were free from device-related or PMMA-related complications leading to revision, supplemental fixation, non-elective removal, or reoperation throughout the study. Complications included, but were not limited to device or PMMA fracture, device or PMMA-related loosening, device or PMMA-related device disassembly, device migration or PMMA extravasation.
24 months
Efficacy Endpoint: Successful radiographic fusion
Time Frame: 24 months
Presence of continuous bridging bone across the implant
24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Oswestry Disability Index
Time Frame: 24 months
This is a measure of the patient's self reported permanent functional disability. Each section is scored on a 1-5 scale with 5 representing the greatest disability.
24 months
Visual Analogue Scale for back pain
Time Frame: 24 months
This is a measure of the characteristic or attitude that is believed to range across a continuum of values to measure pain intensity. The range of score is from 0 - 100. The patient marks on the line the point that they feel represents their perception of their current state. A higher score indicates greater pain intensity.
24 months
Adverse events
Time Frame: 24 months
Adverse event rates
24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Bita Ghadimi, Alphatec Spine, Inc.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2012

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

February 12, 2017

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

November 8, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 31, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 4, 2012

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

June 7, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

February 25, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 22, 2022

Last Verified

February 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • REC-000784

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteoporosis

Clinical Trials on OsseoScrew Spinal Fixation System

3
Subscribe