Comparison of Prohance® With Gadovist®/Gadavist™ in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the Brain (TRUTH)

June 4, 2015 updated by: Bracco Diagnostics, Inc

Phase IV, Double-blind, Multi-center, Randomized, Crossover Study to Compare 0.1 mmol/kg of Prohance® With 0.1 mmol/kg of Gadovist®/Gadavist™ in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the Brain (TRUTH)

This study aims at a direct comparison between ProHance (0.1 mmol/kg) and a validated comparator Gadovist/Gadavist (0.1 mmol/kg) in a crossover intra-individual design in subjects with brain tumors to confirm the identical overall technical and diagnostic performance of the two MR contrast agents.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Adult patients were given two MRI exams, one after injection of ProHance (0.1 mmol/kg) and one after injection of Gadovist/Gadavist (0.1 mmol/kg). The exams were performed with identical equipment and imaging parameters with the order of the two exams randomized and 2-14 days between the first and the second MRI exam. Image data was evaluated by 3 expert neuroradiologist blinded to the agent administered and patient clinical data.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

229

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New Jersey
      • Teaneck, New Jersey, United States, 07666
        • Holy Name Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Are scheduled to undergo MRI
  • Are willing to undergo two MRI procedures within 14 days
  • Have confirmed or are highly suspected of brain disease likely to enhance as determined by the following:
  • Clinical/neurological symptomatology;
  • Diagnostic testing, such as CT or previous MRI examinations; or
  • Have had previous brain surgery and are to be evaluated for recurrence.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Are pregnant or lactating females. Exclude the possibility of pregnancy:
  • by testing on site at the institution within 24 hours prior to the start of each investigational product administration; or
  • by history (i.e., tubal ligation or hysterectomy); or
  • post menopausal with a minimum of 1 year without menses
  • Have any known allergy to one or more of the ingredients in the investigational products, or have a history of hypersensitivity to any metals
  • Have congestive heart failure (class IV according to the classification of the New York Heart Association; see Appendix A)
  • Have suffered a stroke within a year
  • Have received or are scheduled to receive any other contrast medium in the 24 hours preceding through the 24 hours following Exam 1, and in the 24 hours preceding through the 24 hours following Exam 2
  • Have received or are scheduled to receive an investigational compound and/or medical device within 30 days before admission into the present study, through the 24 hours post-administration of the second investigational product.
  • Have moderate-to-severe renal impairment, defined as a GFR/eGFR < 45 mL/min.
  • Have been previously entered into this study
  • Have received or are scheduled for one of the following:
  • Surgery within three weeks prior to the first examination or between the two examinations
  • Initiation of steroid therapy between the two examinations
  • Radiosurgery between the two examinations
  • Have any contraindications to MRI such as a pace-maker, magnetic material (i.e., surgical clips) or any other conditions that would preclude proximity to a strong magnetic field.
  • Are suffering from severe claustrophobia

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: MRI with Gadoteridol
MRI after 0.1 mmol/kg IV ProHance, then with 0.1 mmol/kg Gadovist/Gadavist. MRI performed after both agents with identical sequences.
ProHance 0.1 mmol/kg
Other Names:
  • ProHance
Gadovist/Gadavist 0.1 mmol/kg
Other Names:
  • Gadovist, Gadavist
Active Comparator: MRI with Gadobutrol
MRI after 0.1 mmol/kg IV Gadovist/Gadavist, then with 0.1 mmol/kg ProHance. MRI performed after both agents with identical sequences.
ProHance 0.1 mmol/kg
Other Names:
  • ProHance
Gadovist/Gadavist 0.1 mmol/kg
Other Names:
  • Gadovist, Gadavist

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Global Diagnostic Preference Between the Two Exams
Time Frame: Comparison of image sets obtained within 2 to 14 days
Assessed by 3 blinded readers for each of the 198 patients who had post-dose exams for both ProHance and Gadovist/Gadavist. Readers assessed whether images with ProHance were preferred or images with Gadovist/Gadavist were preferred, or whether images after both exams were considered equal.
Comparison of image sets obtained within 2 to 14 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Lesion Border Delineation
Time Frame: Comparison of image sets obtained within 2 to 14 days
Assessed by 3 blinded readers for each of the 198 patients who had post-dose exams for both ProHance and Gadovist/Gadavist. Readers assessed whether images with ProHance were preferred or images with Gadovist/Gadavist were preferred, or whether images after both exams were considered equal.
Comparison of image sets obtained within 2 to 14 days
Lesion Internal Morphology
Time Frame: Comparison of image sets obtained within 2 to 14 days
Assessed by 3 blinded readers for each of the 198 patients who had post-dose exams for both ProHance and Gadovist/Gadavist. Readers assessed whether images with ProHance were preferred or images with Gadovist/Gadavist were preferred, or whether images after both exams were considered equal.
Comparison of image sets obtained within 2 to 14 days
Extent of Disease
Time Frame: Comparison of image sets obtained within 2 to 14 days
Assessed by 3 blinded readers for each of the 198 patients who had post-dose exams for both ProHance and Gadovist/Gadavist. Readers assessed whether images with ProHance were preferred or images with Gadovist/Gadavist were preferred, or whether images after both exams were considered equal.
Comparison of image sets obtained within 2 to 14 days
Lesion Contrast Enhancement
Time Frame: Comparison of image sets obtained within 2 to 14 days
Assessed by 3 blinded readers for each of the 198 patients who had post-dose exams for both ProHance and Gadovist/Gadavist. Readers assessed whether images with ProHance were preferred or images with Gadovist/Gadavist were preferred, or whether images after both exams were considered equal.
Comparison of image sets obtained within 2 to 14 days
Lesion to Background Ratio on Post T1-weighed Spin Echo Images
Time Frame: 5-10 minutes Postdose
Mean of difference in signal intensity postdose (ProHance - Gadovist/Gadavist)
5-10 minutes Postdose
Percentage Signal Intensity Enhancement on Postdose Images
Time Frame: 5-10 minutes Postdose
Mean difference in percentage signal intensity enhancement on postdose T1-weighted SE/FSE images (ProHance - Gadovist/Gadavist)
5-10 minutes Postdose
Lesion Detection
Time Frame: 5-10 minutes Postdose
Lesion detection rate by contrast agent and reader
5-10 minutes Postdose
Accuracy for Tumor Characterization
Time Frame: 5-10 minutes Postdose
Blinded reader assessment of accuracy of tumor characterization (benign/malignant) - patient level assessment
5-10 minutes Postdose

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 4, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 5, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

June 7, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 1, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 4, 2015

Last Verified

June 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Brain Disease

Clinical Trials on gadoteridol

3
Subscribe