Laser Ablation After Stereotactic Radiosurgery (LAASR)

April 11, 2024 updated by: Monteris Medical
The need for new technologies and devices in the field of neurosurgery is well established. In April 2013, FDA cleared NeuroBlate™ System, minimally invasive robotic laser thermotherapy tool. It employs a pulsed surgical laser to deliver targeted energy to abnormal brain tissue caused by tumors and lesions. This post-marketing, multi-center study will include patients with metastatic tumors who failed stereotactic radiosurgery and are already scheduled for NeuroBlate procedure. The study will collect clinical outcome, Quality of Life (QoL) and, where feasible, healthcare utilization data for publication.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

44

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Connecticut
      • New Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06520
        • Yale School of Medicine
    • Kansas
      • Kansas City, Kansas, United States, 66160
        • Kansas University Medical Center
    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
        • Washington University in St Louis
    • North Carolina
      • Charlotte, North Carolina, United States, 28204
        • Carolina Neurosurgery & Spine Associates
      • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27157
        • Wake Forest School of Medicine
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
        • Cleveland Clinic
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19107
        • Thomas Jefferson University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with radiographic evidence of lesion regrowth following prior treatment with radiosurgery (regardless of the process being suspected recurrent or progressive brain metastasis versus radionecrosis).

Description

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient has signed and received a copy of the Informed Consent Form
  2. Patient may have up to 3 target supratentorial metastatic lesions previously treated with stereotactic radiosurgery, with radiological evidence of progression, pseudoprogression or radionecrosis. Subject may have additional non target lesions present as long as they are not expected (in Investigator's judgment) to contribute to symptomatology during the course of the study or confound interpretation of radiological and clinical measures.
  3. Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) ≥ 60.

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Females who are pregnant, breast feeding, or plan to become pregnant in the 6 months following index procedure.
  2. Leptomeningeal metastases.
  3. Uncontrolled infectious process.
  4. Uncontrolled hypertension (systolic >180 mm Hg), angina pectoris, or cardiac dysrhythmia, or recent (within 6 weeks) history of intracranial hemorrhage.
  5. Serious infection, immunosuppression or concurrent medical condition (chronic or acute in nature) that may prevent safe participation or ability to meet follow-up requirements.
  6. Abnormal absolute neutrophil count (ANC<1000/mm), platelets (<100,000/mm) or the administration of antiplatelet agents (aspirin, plavix etc) or anticoagulation within 7 days prior to treatment.
  7. Inadequate bone marrow, liver and renal function (e.g., total bilirubin > 1.5 x ULN; AST, ALT > 2.5 x ULN; alkaline phosphatase > 2.5 x ULN; serum creatinine > 1.5 x ULN).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Main cohort
Patients with radiographic evidence of lesion regrowth following prior treatment with stereotactic radiosurgery (regardless of the process being suspected recurrent or progressive brain metastasis versus radiation necrosis) and who already scheduled for NeuroBlate procedure.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Patients With Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
Time Frame: Images were collected at 12 and 26 weeks post index procedure.
To describe local (CNS) progression-free survival rate in patients with failed radiosurgery for brain metastases treated with the NeuroBlate System. Sites were requested to submit imaging to a centralized core laboratory for analysis. A total of 27 patients had images submitted--27/42 (64%) of patients submitted follow-up images at 12-weeks and 16/42 (38%) patients submitted follow-up imaging at 26 weeks. Due to the low submission of follow-up images at 26-weeks, 12-weeks and last follow-up are reported.
Images were collected at 12 and 26 weeks post index procedure.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of Life (Change in The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Brain (FACT-Br) Score.
Time Frame: baseline, 12 and 26 weeks post index procedure
FACT-Br questionnaire sub-scores (Physical well-being, social/family well-being, emotional well-being, functional well-being, brain cancer subscale) are summed together, leading to a FACT-Br total score on a scale from 0-200; larger scores indicate better overall quality of life. This outcome measured the FACT-Br score change from Baseline at both 12 and 26 weeks post NeuroBlate procedure (values at 12 and 26 weeks, respectively, minus value at baseline). Version 4 of the Fact-BR scoring guidelines were used.
baseline, 12 and 26 weeks post index procedure
Overall Survival
Time Frame: 12 and 26 weeks post index procedure
To describe/estimate the overall survival after the NeuroBlate Procedure.
12 and 26 weeks post index procedure
Percentage of Patients With Laser Ablation Related Adverse Events
Time Frame: All adverse events reported through 26 weeks post index procedure
To continue to monitor factors impacting the safe and efficacious use of NeuroBlate
All adverse events reported through 26 weeks post index procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Veronica Chiang, MD, Yale School of Medicine

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 24, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 24, 2012

First Posted (Estimated)

July 26, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

April 15, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 11, 2024

Last Verified

August 1, 2021

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Quality of Life

3
Subscribe