A Multi-centre Trial of an Open Lung Strategy Including Permissive Hypercapnia, Alveolar Recruitment and Low Airway Pressure in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (PHARLAP)

November 26, 2018 updated by: Carol Hodgson, Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre

A Multi-centre Randomised Controlled Trial of an Open Lung Strategy Including Permissive Hypercapnia, Alveolar Recruitment and Low Airway Pressure in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Some people develop the condition called acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). This is a condition where the lungs have become injured from one of a number of various causes, and do not work as they normally do to provide oxygen and remove carbon dioxide from the body. This can lead to a reduced amount of oxygen in the patient's bloodstream. Patients with ARDS are admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and need help with their breathing by being connected to a ventilator (breathing machine). ARDS can lead to injury in other organs of the body causing other problems but also death.

Over the past few years, reducing the size of each breath delivered by the ventilator in conjunction with the use of an occasional sustained deep breath called a "recruitment manoeuvre" have been used to try to prevent further damage to the lungs in people with ARDS. This ventilator strategy (termed the PHARLAP strategy) has been shown in a small research study to have some beneficial effects without causing any obvious harm, when compared to a current best practice ventilator strategy. The main beneficial effects of the PHARLAP strategy were to increase the amount of oxygen in the blood and to reduce markers of inflammation (the body reacting to a disease process) in the body. This study was too small to make a strong conclusion, so this study will be much larger and will assess whether patients who have developed ARDS are better off when we use the PHARLAP strategy. Three hundred and forty patients will be enrolled into this study in multiple ICUs across Australia and New Zealand.

The study hypothesis is that the PHARLAP strategy group will have a higher number of ventilator free days at day 28 than the control group.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

115

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New South Wales
      • Albury, New South Wales, Australia
        • Albury/Wodonga
      • Kingswood, New South Wales, Australia, 2747
        • Nepean Hospital
      • Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
        • Royal Prince Alfred
      • Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia, 2500
        • Wollongong Hospital
    • Queensland
      • Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
        • The Prince Charles Hospital
    • South Australia
      • Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
        • Flinders Medical Centre
    • Victoria
      • Geelong, Victoria, Australia, 3220
        • Geelong Hospital
      • Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 3004
        • The Alfred Hosptial
      • Dublin, Ireland
        • Beaumont Hospital
      • Dublin, Ireland
        • Mater Misericordiae University Hospital
      • Dublin, Ireland
        • St Vincents Hospital
      • Dublin, Ireland
        • Adelaide and Meath (Tallaght) Hospital
      • Limerick, Ireland
        • University Hospital Limerick
      • Auckland, New Zealand, 1142
        • Auckland City Hospital (DCCM)
      • Auckland, New Zealand, 1142
        • Auckland City Hospital CVICU
    • Auckland
      • Otahuhu, Auckland, New Zealand, 1640
        • Middlemore Hospital
      • Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
        • King Abdulaziz Medical City
      • Bristol, United Kingdom
        • Southmead Hospital
      • Hull, United Kingdom
        • Hull Royal Infirmary
      • London, United Kingdom
        • North Middlesex University Hospital
      • London, United Kingdom
        • King's College Hospital
      • London, United Kingdom
        • University Hospital, Lewisham
      • Middlesbrough, United Kingdom
        • James Cook University Hospital
    • Cambridgeshire
      • Peterborough, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom
        • Peterborough City Hospital
    • Devon
      • Plymouth, Devon, United Kingdom
        • Derriford Hospital
    • Kent
      • Orpington, Kent, United Kingdom
        • Princess Royal University Hospital
    • Surrey
      • Guildford, Surrey, United Kingdom
        • Royal Surrey County Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Adult ICU patients who met all of the following criteria:

  • Currently intubated and receiving mechanical ventilation
  • Within 72 Hours of a diagnosis of ARDS (moderate and severe) based on the following Berlin definition:
  • Within 1 week of a known clinical insult or new or worsening respiratory symptoms
  • Bilateral opacities on CXR which are not fully explained by effusions, lobar/lung collapse or nodules
  • Respiratory failure not fully explained by cardiac failure or fluid overload
  • PaO2/FiO2 < 200mmHg with PEEP ≥ 5cmH2O

Exclusion Criteria:

  • > 72 hours since diagnosis of ARDS
  • > 10 days of continuous mechanical ventilation
  • Barotrauma (pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, subcutaneous emphysema or any intercostal catheter for the treatment of air leak)
  • Significant chest trauma i.e. multiple rib fractures
  • Active bronchospasm or a history of significant chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma
  • Clinical suspicion for significant restrictive lung disease (history of pulmonary fibrosis or suggestive pulmonary function tests)
  • Moderate or severe traumatic brain injury, the presence of an intracranial pressure monitor, or any medical condition associated with a clinical suspicion of raised intracranial pressure
  • Unstable cardiovascular status defined as sustained heart rate < 40 or > 140 bpm, ventricular tachycardia, or SBP < 80mmHg
  • Pregnancy
  • Receiving ECMO
  • Receiving high frequency oscillatory ventilation
  • Death is deemed imminent and inevitable
  • The treating physician believes it is not in the best interest of the patient to be enrolled in the trial
  • Consent not obtained or refused by patient's legal surrogate

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: PHARLAP ventilation group
PHARLAP mechanical ventilation strategy
Pressure control ventilation to maintain tidal volume 4-6 ml/kg and plateau pressure ≤ 30 cmH2O while tolerating respiratory acidosis if pH > 7.15; daily staircase recruitment manoeuvre and individualised PEEP titration.
Active Comparator: Control group ventilation
Control group mechanical ventilation strategy
Mechanical ventilation based on the ARDSnet protocol using volume control ventilation with tidal volume 6 ml/kg, plateau pressure ≤ 30 cmH2O and FiO2/PEEP titration according to a FiO2/PEEP/oxygen saturation combination chart. This has been modified for Australian and New Zealand practice to allow pressure control and pressure support ventilation.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Number of ventilator free days at day 28 post randomisation
Time Frame: 28 days post randomisation
28 days post randomisation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PaO2/FiO2 ratio and static lung compliance
Time Frame: Up to day 28 post randomisation
Up to day 28 post randomisation
Baseline to day 3 change in IL-8 and IL-6 concentrations in broncho-alveolar lavage and plasma
Time Frame: Day 3 post randomisation
Day 3 post randomisation
Incidence of severe hypotension
Time Frame: Up to 90 days post randomisation
Up to 90 days post randomisation
Incidence of barotrauma
Time Frame: Up to 90 days post randomisation
Up to 90 days post randomisation
Use of rescue therapies for severe hypoxaemia - inhaled nitric oxide, inhaled prostacyclin, prone positioning, high frequency oscillatory ventilation and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)
Time Frame: Within hospital admission
Within hospital admission
Mortality
Time Frame: Up to 6 months post randomisation
At timepoints: ICU discharge, hospital discharge, 28 days, 90 days and 6 months
Up to 6 months post randomisation
ICU and hospital length of stay
Time Frame: Up to 6 months
Up to 6 months
Incidence of AKI
Time Frame: Within hospital admission
Within hospital admission
Quality of life assessment
Time Frame: 6 months post randomisation
SF36v2
6 months post randomisation
Cost effectiveness analysis
Time Frame: 6 months post randomisation
Based on EQ-5D
6 months post randomisation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Carol Hodgson, PhD, FACP, BAppSc (Physio), Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre (ANZIC-RC)
  • Study Chair: Alistair Nichol, PhD, FCICM, Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre (ANZIC-RC)

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 12, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 15, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

August 17, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 28, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 26, 2018

Last Verified

November 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Clinical Trials on PHARLAP mechanical ventilation strategy

3
Subscribe