MiraLAX Versus Placebo to Prevent Constipation Following Urogynecologic Surgery (MVP)

February 14, 2017 updated by: Duke University

Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial of MiraLAX Versus Placebo to Prevent Constipation Following Urogynecologic Surgery in Women Receiving Routine Docusate Sodium

A. Purpose To compare MiraLAX versus placebo for preventing constipation in the immediate postoperative period following pelvic reconstructive surgery in women taking routine docusate sodium.

B. Objectives

  1. Specific Aims Specific Aim 1: To compare time to first bowel movement (BM) between MiraLAX versus placebo in women receiving routine docusate sodium after pelvic reconstructive surgery.

    Specific Aim 2: To compare patient reported outcomes of BM quality and associated gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms between MiraLAX versus placebo using the Bristol stool scale and the validated Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptom Questionnaire (PAC-SYM) in women receiving routine docusate sodium after pelvic reconstructive surgery.

    Specific Aim 3: To evaluate GI-related quality of life between MiraLAX versus placebo utilizing the validated Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (PAC-QOL) in women receiving routine docusate sodium after pelvic reconstructive surgery.

  2. Hypotheses The investigators hypothesize that MiraLAX will optimally prevent constipation following pelvic reconstructive surgery by decreasing time to first BM, decreasing GI symptoms associated with constipation, and increasing measures of GI-related quality of life, while minimizing the bothersome side effects associated with stimulant laxatives.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial of MiraLAX versus placebo in women undergoing pelvic reconstructive surgery receiving routine docusate sodium. Subjects will be screened for eligibility during their preoperative visits and once enrolled, they will be randomized to receive MiraLAX or placebo starting on postoperative day (POD) 1 and continuing through POD 5. Subjects will be instructed to stop taking this medication if they experience any diarrhea. Subjects in both arms will be instructed to take milk of magnesia as a rescue laxative if they do not experience a BM by the morning of POD 6. All subjects will be provided a 30 day supply of docusate sodium and be instructed to begin this medication on POD 1.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

131

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27707
        • Duke University, Department of Urogynecology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

17 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • English-speaking female patients
  • > 18 years of age
  • Not pregnant (patients of childbearing potential will have a serum pregnancy test done pre-operatively as part of their surgical planning)
  • Undergoing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse or stress urinary incontinence
  • Recruited from the Duke University Division of Urogynecology

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Allergy/hypersensitivity to study medications
  • Cardiac or renal disease
  • Takes chronic daily laxatives
  • Excluded if unable to complete at least 5 days of a 7 day baseline bowel diary
  • Excluded if mesh resection or Interstim procedure
  • Excluded if concurrent surgery includes anal sphincteroplasty or rectovaginal fistula repair

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Placebo maltodextrin 17g powder daily for 5 days postoperatively following urogynecologic surgery
Placebo maltodextrin 17g powder daily for 5 days postoperatively following urogynecologic surgery
Other Names:
  • Maltodextrin
All participants will be instructed to take Milk of Magnesia with standard over-the-counter dosing as a recue laxative if the subject has not had a bowel movement by postoperative day 6.
Other Names:
  • Milk of Magnesia
Active Comparator: MiraLax
MiraLax 17g powder daily for 5 days postoperatively following urogynecologic surgery
All participants will be instructed to take Milk of Magnesia with standard over-the-counter dosing as a recue laxative if the subject has not had a bowel movement by postoperative day 6.
Other Names:
  • Milk of Magnesia
MiraLax 17g powder daily for 5 days postoperatively following urogynecologic surgery
Other Names:
  • PEG 3350
  • Polyethylene Glycol 3350

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to first postoperative bowel movement
Time Frame: First postoperative week
The primary outcome is time to first postoperative bowel movement (in hours, converted to days) based upon postoperative bowel diary. Time will be calculated based upon date and time of first postoperative bowel movement from start time of surgery.
First postoperative week

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Other postoperative medication use
Time Frame: First postoperative week
Rescue laxative use, daily pain level and narcotic use will be obtained from postoperative bowel diaries.
First postoperative week
Evaluation of symptoms and quality of life related to constipation
Time Frame: First postoperative week
The investigators will evaluate BM quality based upon Bristol stool scale. Straining, abdominal or rectal pain, incomplete evacuation and the impact of these symptoms on GI-related quality of life will be assessed by the PAC-SYM and PAC-QOL validated questionnaires. The PAC-SYM is a validated 12-item questionnaire based upon the Rome criteria for constipation and is tailored to assess a change in symptoms following an intervention.2 This questionnaire has been previously used with success in studies with urogynecologic patients. The PAC-QOL is a validated 28-item questionnaire assessing quality-of-life issues, including burden of constipation on daily functioning and well-being. The Bristol stool scale, which is a visual BM rating scale from 1 to 7, provides a validated measure of gut transit time based upon the shape, consistency and appearance of BM.
First postoperative week
Symptoms of Over-Effectiveness
Time Frame: First Postoperative Week
Symptoms of over-effectiveness, including abdominal pain or cramping, bloating, loose stools, watery diarrhea and their impact on GI-related quality of life will be evaluated based upon bowel diaries, Bristol stool scales and the PAC-SYM and PAC-QOL questionnaires.
First Postoperative Week
Evaluation of symptoms and quality of life related to constipation 6-weeks postoperatively
Time Frame: 5-7 weeks postoperatively
The investigators will evaluate BM quality based upon Bristol stool scale. Straining, abdominal or rectal pain, incomplete evacuation and the impact of these symptoms on GI-related quality of life will be assessed by the PAC-SYM and PAC-QOL validated questionnaires. The PAC-SYM is a validated 12-item questionnaire based upon the Rome criteria for constipation and is tailored to assess a change in symptoms following an intervention.2 This questionnaire has been previously used with success in studies with urogynecologic patients. The PAC-QOL is a validated 28-item questionnaire assessing quality-of-life issues, including burden of constipation on daily functioning and well-being. The Bristol stool scale, which is a visual BM rating scale from 1 to 7, provides a validated measure of gut transit time based upon the shape, consistency and appearance of BM.
5-7 weeks postoperatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Anthony G Visco, MD, Duke University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 18, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 20, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

September 25, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 15, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 14, 2017

Last Verified

October 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Post Procedural Constipation

Clinical Trials on Placebo

3
Subscribe