Oral Azithromycin Versus Doxycycline in Posterior Blepharitis

December 28, 2013 updated by: Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Study of the Effect of Oral Azithromycin on Posterior Blepharitis

One hundred patients with the diagnosis of posterior blepharitis based on history taking and proper physical examinations by two experienced ophthalmologists will include in the study.

Patients will diagnose with posterior blepharitis if they score at least one in two symptoms (based on a subjective grading scale) and two signs (based on an objective grading scale) of posterior blepharitis according to study criteria. Patients will exclude if they have the following criteria: age< 12 years old,history of previous ocular or lacrimal surgery,previous usage of contact lenses,any history of ocular allergy,history of systemic diseases with ocular involvement (except rosacea), history of usage of topical or systemic antibiotic in the last month, pregnancy or lactating mothers, liver failure and any history of sensitivity to cyclines.

Qualified patients then randomly receive oral azithromycin (2 of 250 mg capsules for the first day and 250mg for the next 4 days) or oral doxycycline (100mg capsule every 12 hours for one month) in a double-blinded fashion. each patients in both treatment groups will accurately instruct to apply warm compress and eyelid scrubbing 2 times a day for 5 minutes each in the treatment period. Symptoms and signs were recorded for each patient in two treatment groups at baseline visit (before treatment) and then in the days 7, 31, 37 and 61 after treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

13 years to 90 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients were diagnosed with posterior blepharitis if they scored at least one in two symptoms (based on a subjective grading scale) and two signs (based on an objective grading scale) of posterior blepharitis according to study criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients were excluded if they had the following criteria: age< 12 years old,history of previous ocular or lacrimal surgery,previous usage of contact lenses,any history of ocular allergy,history of systemic diseases with ocular involvement (except rosacea), history of usage of topical or systemic antibiotic in the last month, pregnancy or lactating mothers, liver failure and any history of sensitivity to cyclines

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Oral Azithromycin
Two 250 mg capsules (500 mg) of Azithromycin for the first day and 250mg/day for the next 4 days.
Other Names:
  • Azithromycin (Razak Co., Tehran)
Active Comparator: Doxycycline
Oral doxycycline 100mg capsule every 12 hours for one month
Other Names:
  • Doxycycline (Kimidarou Co., Tehran)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of Blepharitis Symptoms Score
Time Frame: Change from the baseline until 61 days after treatment
Five main ocular symptoms of posterior blepharitis (itching, foreign body sensation, dryness, burning, and lid swelling) will be asked of each patient and graded at baseline, and days 7, 31, 37 and 61 after treatment. For each item there was a question with scale from zero to three (zero for no symptom three for maximum symptom). Therefore, maximum score for symptoms was 15 (worse outcome) and minimum score for symptoms was zero (better outcome). Finally, we reported a change in total score calculated as the latest time point (61 days) minus the earliest time point.
Change from the baseline until 61 days after treatment
Change of Symptoms and Signs Scores (Difference Between Total Score of First Time and 61 Days Later), Total Severity Score
Time Frame: zero time and 61 days later
Total severity score was a combined score of symptoms and signs. For symptoms, there were five items and for signs there were seven items. Each items had three scales form Zero (no symptom) to three (severe symptom). Therefore, there was 12 items to calculate total severity score. Maximum score was 36 (worse outcome) and minimum score was zero (better outcome). A change in total severity score calculated as the latest time period (61 days) minus earliest time point.
zero time and 61 days later

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Main Ocular Signs
Time Frame: Change from baseline until 61 days after treatment
lid margin debris, lid margin redness, Meibomian gland (MG) secretion, occluded MG, conjunctival redness, tear brake up time and ocular surface staining at Baseline, and days 7, 31, 37 and 61 after treatment were measured. For each items there was a question with scale form zero to three (zero for no sign to three for maximum sign). Therefore, maximum score for signs was 21 (worse outcome) and minimum score was zero (better outcome). We calculated a total score for signs. Finally, we reported a change in total score calculated as the latest time point (61 days) minus earliest time point.
Change from baseline until 61 days after treatment

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of Total Severity Score Between Baseline and 7 Days Later
Time Frame: baseline and 7 days later
Total severity score was a combined score of symptoms and signs. For symptoms, there were five items and for signs there were seven items. Each items had three scales form Zero (no symptom) to three (severe symptom). Therefore, there was 12 items to calculate total severity score. Maximum score was 36 (worse outcome) and minimum score was zero (better outcome). A change in total severity score calculated as the latest time period (7 days) minus earliest time point.
baseline and 7 days later
Change of Total Severity Score Between Baseline and 31 Days Later
Time Frame: baseline and 31 days later
Total severity score was a combined score of symptoms and signs. For symptoms, there were five items and for signs there were seven items. Each items had three scales form Zero (no symptom) to three (severe symptom). Therefore, there was 12 items to calculate total severity score. Maximum score was 36 (worse outcome) and minimum score was zero (better outcome). A change in total severity score calculated as the latest time period (31 days) minus earliest time point.
baseline and 31 days later
Change of Total Severity Score Between Baseline and 37 Days Later
Time Frame: baseline and 37 days later
Total severity score was a combined score of symptoms and signs. For symptoms, there were five items and for signs there were seven items. Each items had three scales form Zero (no symptom) to three (severe symptom). Therefore, there was 12 items to calculate total severity score. Maximum score was 36 (worse outcome) and minimum score was zero (better outcome). A change in total severity score calculated as the latest time period (37 days) minus earliest time point.
baseline and 37 days later

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Mohsen B Kashkouli, MD, Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 1, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 4, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

February 5, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 12, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 28, 2013

Last Verified

December 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Posterior Blepharitis

Clinical Trials on Azithromycin

3
Subscribe