Investigating Variation in Hospital Acute Coronary Syndrome Outcomes

March 7, 2013 updated by: Oras Alabas, University of Leeds

Evaluation of the Methods and Management of Acute Coronary Events: 3. Investigating Variation in Hospital Acute Coronary Syndrome Outcomes

To investigate the causes of hospital variation in outcomes from acute coronary syndromes in England and develop recommendations for improving patient care.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Over the last few years the chance of dying from a heart attack in England and Wales has reduced dramatically. Even so, there remain huge differences in mortality between hospitals. For example, up to a third of patients with a heart attack who attend hospitals in England are more likely to die than would be expected. That is, the type of treatment and the risk of death depends upon where a patient lives and which hospital they attend. In part, the variation in death may be due to the services available at the hospital or to factors such as socioeconomic deprivation. It may also relate to other factors such as depression, cardiac rehabilitation and whether patients take their medication after discharge from hospital. Using powerful statistical approaches that include measures of quality of life, we propose to examine data about heart attacks in England and investigate the 'postcode lottery of care'. Our aim, using regional data about heart attacks is to identify and measure the effects of hospital care. This research will identify hospital qualities that promote improved patient care. In doing so, best practice will be highlighted and healthcare policy changed so that all patients will have an equal chance of surviving a heart attack.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

5555

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • West Yorkshire
      • Leeds, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom, LS2 9JT
        • University of Leeds

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Consented patients with acute coronary syndrome were recruited from acute Trusts in England. These hospitals have been selected because of their diverse population demographics, different acute coronary syndrome care pathways and established track record for good data collection. Specifically these hospitals represent both teaching hospitals and community hospitals - but more importantly include a wide range of patient types. Mortality tracked through the UK statistics authority, and primary and secondary endpoints tracked locally and transferred through the secure NHS net to a central database.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age > 18 years
  • Both sexes
  • Acute admission to the acute Trust with suspected acute coronary syndrome

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients at a terminal stage of any illness
  • Those in whom follow up would be inappropriate or impractical

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Acute myocardial infarction
patient with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
delays to treatment
Time Frame: 12 months
Quantification of hospital attributable effects relating to early and late mortality
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Describing trajectories of quality of life recovery patterns
Time Frame: 12 month
Describing trajectories of quality of life recovery patterns
12 month

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Develop a risk score and a near-point risk Acute Coronary Syndrome model
Time Frame: two years
Develop a risk score and a near-point risk Acute Coronary Syndrome model
two years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Chris P Gale, PhD, University of Leeds

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 7, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 7, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

March 8, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 8, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 7, 2013

Last Verified

March 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Myocardial Infarction

3
Subscribe