Assessment of Quality of Global and Sexual Life and Impact of Surgical and Non Surgical Vaginal Aplasia in Patients With a Rokitansky Syndrome (MRKH)

August 29, 2025 updated by: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

The principal objective is to assess the general health status and the sexual health status of women with Rokitansky syndrome having received a surgical or non surgical treatment.

The secondary purpose is to assess the anatomical aspect and the quality of sexual life. To search a correlation between the anatomical result, the general and sexual quality of life. To compare the different techniques of medical follow-up in terms of anatomic results, general quality of life, sexual quality of life, complications and morbidities.

To evaluate social inclusion of these women with their family situation, social and professional category and their job.

At the same time, we propose an evaluation with a psychologist to study the impact of the announcement of the diagnosis. This impact study is conducted at a distance from diagnosis.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The MRKH syndrome is a congenital disorder characterized by absence of uterus and at least the two thirds of the vagina, a female phenotype and a normal karyotype XX.

These patients have normal ovaries and fallopian tubes. The external genitalia are normal. This syndrome was described by Mayer (1829), Rokitansky ( 1838), Kuster ( 1910) and Hauser ( 1961). About one in every 4500 female babies has this condition. This syndrome represents 85% of congenital vagina aplasia and is the second cause of primary amenorrhea after disorders of sexual development. These women are unfertile.

The malformation can be isolated or associated with other malformations called MURCS (Müllerian duct aplasia, renal aplasia, and cervicothoracic somite dysplasia), as kidney ( 30%), bone ( 10%) or cardiac malformations ( 1%).

The most common age for MRKH to be diagnosed is when the woman hasn't started her period ( 85%).Some girls may find out at an earlier age when there is a severe malformation , during a systematic gynaecological examination or during an pelvic ultrasound. When the women are older, the syndrome can be diagnosed during studies for infertility.

A pelvic ultrasound is usually the first test performed to assess presence of uterus. A magnetic resonance imaging may be used to complete the investigations. These tests can also confirm if there are two ovaries and two kidneys. Sometimes, a very small uterus can be seen, it's a uterine horn.

The psychological management is essential to take care of the women affected.It seeks to understand the impact of the diagnosis announcement and the various treatments offered. The follow-up can be different for each girl and her parents during several appointments.

Therapeutic management can be proposed when the girl is ready because the therapeutic is long and difficult. Two therapeutic approaches can be proposed: to create a vagina using dilators or having a surgical procedure. In France, vaginal reconstruction with dilators is the most used. This method consists in dilating the vagina progressively with different sizes of dilators in order to obtain a vaginal opening of 8 cm around 6 months after treatment initiation. This method is successful in about 75% of cases. Complications are exceptional.

Surgery is an option for patients who are unsuccessful with dilatators or patients who prefer surgery. A number of operations are appropriate for the correction of vaginal agenesis. Vecchietti procedure and sigmoid vaginoplasty are the most commonly used techniques in France.

In national and international publications, it is impossible to compare scientifically the results of the different technique because of the small effective in each studies and because of the the lack of standardized assessment. Studies report the functional result for each technique but none compare the techniques used. No studies compared the result in terms of anatomical and function results, complications and quality of life.

The demonstration of a positive correlation between the anatomic criteria and the functional results would help to guide the surgical technique. The lack of correlation would suggest that a perfect anatomical reconstruction is not essential. If it is demonstrated, the management should focus on other criteria like psychological management. Several factors seem to influence the general and sexual quality of life of women affected by the Rokitansky syndrome. Our objective is to evaluate the importance of these factors to improve the treatment of these women.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

138

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Paris, France, 75015
        • Service d'Endocrinologie et Gynécologie Pédiatriques Hôpital Necker Enfants Malades

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient affected with Rokitansky syndrome
  • Patient over 18 years old
  • Patient care with dilatations or by surgery since 1995
  • Patient having started dilatations or having had surgery since at least one year
  • Patient who signed the consent
  • French patient
  • Women with social welfare

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with a serious chronic disease interfering with analysis to be performed in this project.
  • Patient can't reading or writing
  • Patient with legal protection

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Patients with a Rokitansky Syndrome
Behavioral: evaluate quality of life of surgical and non surgical vaginal aplasia
protocol designed to evaluate quality of life of surgical and non surgical vaginal aplasia

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessment of quality of global life
Time Frame: Day 0
To fill a self-administered questionnaire: the World Health Organization Quality Of Life (general scale WHOQOL)
Day 0

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessment of quality of sexual life
Time Frame: Day 0
To fill 2 self-administered questionnaires : Female Sexual Function Index and Female Sexual Dysfunction Scale-Revised (FSFI and FSDS)
Day 0
Assessment of anatomic results
Time Frame: Day 0
Gynaecological examination
Day 0
Assessment of social integration
Time Frame: Day 0
To fill a self-administered questionnaire (marital status, occupational group, education level, employment status)
Day 0

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Collaborators

Unité de Recherche Clinique Necker Cochin, France

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michel POLAK, PUPH, Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Paris

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 11, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 10, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

April 10, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 26, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 29, 2013

First Posted (Estimated)

July 30, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

September 5, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 29, 2025

Last Verified

August 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • P110124
  • ID RCB : 2011-A01517-34

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rokitansky Syndrome

Clinical Trials on evaluate quality of life of surgical and non surgical vaginal aplasia

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Malta

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Subscribe