Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy Trial Comparing Quality of Life in Patients With Stage IIIC-IV Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneal Cancer

April 17, 2024 updated by: Wake Forest University Health Sciences

A Phase II Trial Comparing Quality of Life After HIPEC in Patients With Stage IIIC and IV Ovarian, Fallopian Tube or Primary Peritoneal Carcinoma

This phase II trial studies how well hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy works in improving quality of life in patients with stage IIIC-IV ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer. In hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, the chemotherapy is warmed before being used and may help the drugs get into the cancer cells better, minimize the toxicity of the drugs on normal cells, and help to kill any cancer cells left over after surgery.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To compare quality of life in patients with advanced ovarian cancer treated with standard of care (SOC) neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) at 6 weeks post-treatment versus quality of life (QOL) patients treatment with intravenous-therapy (IV) chemotherapy.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To describe quality of life in patients with advanced ovarian cancer treated with NAC followed by CRS with HIPEC at 3 and 6 months post-treatment.

II. To describe neurotoxicity in patients with advanced ovarian cancer treated with NAC followed by CRS with HIPEC.

III. To describe abdominal discomfort in patients with advanced ovarian cancer treated with NAC followed by CRS with HIPEC.

IV. To describe toxicities in patients with advanced ovarian cancer treated with NAC followed by CRS with HIPEC.

V. To describe the response rate in patients with advanced ovarian cancer treated with NAC followed by CRS with HIPEC.

VI. To describe progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with advanced ovarian cancer treated with NAC followed by CRS with HIPEC.

OUTLINE: Beginning 4-8 weeks after completion of chemotherapy, patients undergo CRS. Patients then receive carboplatin intraperitoneally (IP) over 90 minutes immediately following CRS.

After completion of chemotherapy, patients are followed up at 30 days, and 3, 6, and 12 months.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27157
        • Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients must have histologically or cytologically confirmed non-mucinous, epithelial stage 3 or 4 carcinoma of the ovary, fallopian tube or peritoneum.
  • Patients must not have received treatment for another malignancy within 3 years of enrollment (patients who have received hormone therapy within 3 years of enrollment are still eligible).
  • Patients must have received at least 3 but not more than 6 cycles of carboplatin-doublet based IV neoadjuvant chemotherapy and achieved at least stable disease (radiographically confirmed) at the conclusion of this therapy.
  • Age ≥ 18 years.
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status =< 2
  • Patients must have adequate organ and marrow function as defined below (within 30 days of registration):
  • Absolute neutrophil count >= 1,500/mcL (within 30 days of registration)
  • Platelets >= 75,000/mcL (within 30 days of registration)
  • Total bilirubin =< 1.5 mg/dL (within 30 days of registration)
  • Creatinine clearance >= 50 mg/dL (within 30 days of registration)
  • Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase [SGOT])/alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase [SGPT]) =< 3 x institutional upper limit of normal (within 30 days of registration)
  • Alkaline phosphatase =< 3 x institutional upper limit of normal (within 30 days of registration)
  • The effects of HIPEC on the developing human fetus are unknown. For this reason, and because carboplatin doublet therapy consists of pregnancy category D agents, women of child-bearing potential must agree to use adequate contraception (hormonal or barrier method of birth control; abstinence) prior to study entry and for the duration of study participation. Should a woman become pregnant or suspect she is pregnant while participating in this study, she should inform her treating physician immediately.
  • Ability to understand and the willingness to sign an institutional review board (IRB)-approved informed consent document.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients may not be receiving any other investigational agents.
  • Patients with extra-abdominal metastatic disease.
  • History of allergic reactions attributed to compounds of similar chemical or biologic composition to carboplatin doublet agents.
  • Uncontrolled intercurrent illness including, but not limited to ongoing or active infection, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, cardiac arrhythmia, or psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements.
  • Pregnant women are excluded from this study because carboplatin doublet therapy consists of pregnancy category D agents with the potential for teratogenic or abortifacient effects. Because there is an unknown but potential risk for adverse events in nursing infants secondary to treatment of the mother with carboplatin doublet therapy, breastfeeding should be discontinued.
  • Men are excluded from participating due to the site specific nature of the disease being studied.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Treatment - Carboplatin, CRS, HIPEC
Beginning 4-8 weeks after completion of chemotherapy, patients undergo CRS. Patients then receive carboplatin IP over 90 minutes immediately following CRS.
Ancillary studies
Other Names:
  • Quality of Life Assessment
Ancillary studies
Undergo CRS
Other Names:
  • Operation
  • Surgery
  • Surgical
  • Surgical Interventions
  • Surgical Procedures
  • Surgical Procedure
Given IV and IP
Other Names:
  • Blastocarb
  • Carboplat
  • Carboplatin Hexal
  • Carboplatino
  • Carbosin
  • Carbosol
  • Carbotec
  • CBDCA
  • Displata
  • Ercar
  • JM-8
  • Nealorin
  • Novoplatinum
  • Paraplatin
  • Paraplatin AQ
  • Paraplatine
  • Platinwas
  • Ribocarbo

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of life (QOL) assessed using Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Ovarian questionnaire
Time Frame: At 6 weeks post treatment
The longitudinal data of QOL will be displayed graphically with individual trajectories. Repeated measures analysis of covariance models will be used for the primary analysis. The baseline QOL visit (as a categorical variable), randomization assignment, and a randomization by visit interaction will be included in the model. The test for the randomization effect at the 6-week post-treatment will be performed using a contrast of the 6-week randomization means. An unstructured covariance matrix will be used.
At 6 weeks post treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Abdominal discomfort assessed using Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group-Abdominal Discomfort questionnaire
Time Frame: Up to 6 months
Abdominal discomfort will be compared between the two treatment arms. The data will be analyzed using Poisson model with GEEs to account for the dependency between repeated measures. This approach will be treated as a sensitivity analysis.
Up to 6 months
Neurotoxicity assessed using Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity questionnaire
Time Frame: Up to 6 months
Neurotoxicity will be compared between the two treatment arms. The data will be analyzed using Poisson model with generalized estimating equations (GEEs) to account for the dependency between repeated measures. This approach will be treated as a sensitivity analysis.
Up to 6 months
Incidence of toxicities evaluated according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0
Time Frame: Up to 3 months
The toxicities will be measured by the number and severity of adverse events defined by CTCAE version 5.0. The count data will be compared assuming a Poisson distribution.
Up to 3 months
Progression free survival
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
Progression free survival will be compared between the two treatment arms using survival analysis. The follow-up time will be calculated from the date of end of treatment. Survival will be measured up to the time until progression, date of last contact, or death, whichever comes first. Kaplan-Meier survival curves will be used to estimate the survival probabilities by treatment arms. Cox proportional hazards models will be used to calculate the hazards ratio and its confidence interval for the treatment effect.
Up to 1 year
Quality of life (QOL) assessed using Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Ovarian
Time Frame: At 3 months post treatment
The test for the randomization effect will be performed using contrasts.
At 3 months post treatment
Quality of life (QOL) in patients with advanced ovarian cancer assessed using Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Ovarian
Time Frame: At 6 months post treatment
The test for the randomization effect will be performed using contrasts.
At 6 months post treatment
Response rates evaluated according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1
Time Frame: Up to 1 year post treatment
The best response using RECIST criteria will be compared between the two treatment arms over time using GEEs to account for the dependency between repeated measures. Logit link and binomial distribution will be applied. The randomization assignment, visit (as a categorical variable), and interaction between randomization and visit will be included in the model. Contrasts will be used to compare the best response at each time point.
Up to 1 year post treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michael Kelly, Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 13, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 31, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 19, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 13, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 13, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

June 15, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 18, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 17, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stage IIIC Fallopian Tube Cancer

Clinical Trials on Quality-of-Life Assessment

3
Subscribe