MANUAL DIAPHRAGM RELEASE TECHNIQUE INCREASES TIDAL VOLUME IN ELDERLY

September 27, 2013 updated by: Daniella Cunha Brandao

MANUAL DIAPHRAGM RELEASE TECHNIQUE INCREASES TIDAL VOLUME AND UPPER RIB CAGE CONTRIBUTION DURING QUIET BREATHING IN ELDERLY: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

Question: Does manual diaphragm release change kinematics and respiratory function of elderly subjects? Design: Randomized controlled trial with concealed allocation and double-blinding.

Participants: 17 volunteers over 60 years old randomized into two groups: 09 in the Control Group (CG) and 08 in the Intervention Group (IG).

Intervention: The manual diaphragm release technique was used on the IG, in two sets of ten deep breaths, with a one minute interval between them. The CG underwent a sham protocol (light touch), with same sets and time of interval.

Outcome measures: The groups were evaluated using spirometry, manovacuometry and optoelectronic plethysmography (OEP), in that order, before and immediately after the intervention.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

17

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Pernambuco
      • Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil, 5000
        • Universidade Federal de Pernambuco

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years to 68 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • over 60 years of age;
  • a body mass index (BMI) below 30 kg/m2
  • non-smokers, self-declared sedentary;
  • presenting a forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC) greater than or equal to 80% of predicted;
  • the ratio between these variables (FEV1/FVC) greater than 70% in spirometry

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Showed the inability to understand verbal commands in the evaluation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Sham Comparator: Control group
For this group, light touch at the same anatomical points was done without exerting pressure or traction. Positioning and duration were identical to the IG to perform the sham protocol (Licciardone & Russo, 2006).
Experimental: Manual diaphragm release technique
To perform the technique the volunteer was placed in supine position with limbs relaxed. Positioned behind the head of the volunteer, the therapist performed manual contact (pisiform, ulnar edge and the last three fingers) with the underside of the costal cartilage of the 7th, 8th, 9th and 10th rib, and guiding forearms toward the shoulders of the corresponding side. In the inspiratory phase, the therapist gently pulled the points of contact with both hands, in the direction of the head, yet slightly lateral, accompanying the elevation movement of the ribs. During exhalation, the therapist deepened contact toward the inner costal, maintaining resistance throughout the inspiratory phase. In the breaths following, the therapist sought to gain traction and smooth increase in the deepening of contacts. This maneuver was performed in two sets of ten deep breaths, with a one minute interval between them.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Compartmental chest wall volume
Time Frame: 1 day
1 day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Pulmonary function
Time Frame: 1 day
1 day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Taciano Rocha, Msc, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 25, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 27, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

September 30, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 30, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 27, 2013

Last Verified

December 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • taciano01

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Healthy

Clinical Trials on The manual diaphragm release technique

3
Subscribe