Proteomic Profiling to Reveal Novel Prognostic Markers for Neurological Outcome Following Resuscitation

February 20, 2020 updated by: Christopher Adlbrecht, Medical University of Vienna

Background: Cardiac arrest is a life-threatening event. Intensivists are challenged with an increasing number of patients with uncertain neurological outcome following cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). The prognostic value of current biomarkers for neurophysiologic long-term outcome is limited.

Hypothesis: We hypothesize that specific brain-derived tissue leakage proteins can be identified to reveal novel, more reliable prognostic biomarkers for good neurological outcome.

Methods: This translational study (n=100) is a combination of a prospective basic science study intended to reduce the number of potential plasma biomarker candidates by proteomic shotgun analyses in brain tissue autopsy samples and plasma samples from resuscitated patients (n=10) and a prospective clinical validation study in a large study population (n=90) by high-throughput analyses. Selection of proteomic markers and signature estimation will be performed to discriminate patients with good and poor outcome.

Clinical perspective: A structured proteomic analysis approach might identify the best marker out of all proteins liberated during cellular damage.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Background: Cardiac arrest is a life-threatening event. Intensivists are challenged with an increasing number of patients with uncertain neurological outcome following cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). The prognostic value of current biomarkers for neurophysiologic long-term outcome is limited. Therefore, identification of novel plasma markers with higher predictive value for neurophysiological recovery is critical for patient management after CPR.

Hypothesis: We hypothesize that specific brain-derived tissue leakage proteins can be identified to reveal novel, more reliable prognostic biomarkers for good neurological outcome.

Methods: This translational study (n=100) is a combination of a prospective basic science study intended to reduce the number of potential plasma biomarker candidates by proteomic shotgun analyses in brain tissue autopsy samples and plasma samples from resuscitated patients (n=10) and a prospective clinical validation study in a large study population (n=90) by high-throughput analyses. Samples will be analyzed by proteomic shotgun analyses using the Q-Exactive quadrupole-orbitrap mass spectrometer (MS). MS/MS data will be interpreted by the MaxQuant and Perseus Software. In order to identify brain-derived proteins within plasma, the plasma proteome of 10 resuscitated patients will be compared to the proteomic profile of brain tissue. This will reduce the number of potential plasma biomarker candidates associated with neurologic outcome. The prospective validation in plasma samples will be performed by a targeted proteomics approach using selected reaction monitoring (SRM) on a triple quadrupole ion MS. Neurological outcome will be assessed by the five-point scale (death, persistent vegetative state, severe disability, moderate disability, and good recovery) according to the cerebral performance categories (CPC). A CPC sore of <3 is considered a good neurological outcome. Selection of proteomic markers and signature estimation will be performed by L1 regularized logistic regression, where the tuning parameter will be optimized by cross-validated model performance. The signature's ability to discriminate patients with good and poor outcome will be described by ROC analysis.

Clinical perspective: An accurate predictor of neurological outcome following CPR is of utmost clinical importance. However, previous studies focused on a very limited array of biomarkers. Therefore, a structured proteomic analysis approach might identify the best marker out of all proteins liberated during cellular damage.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

96

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Vienna, Austria, 1090
        • Medical University of Vienna

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 99 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Resuscitated patients

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Nontraumatic, normothermic cardiac arrest due to cardiac disorders, respiratory failures, or hemodynamic or metabolic factors.
  2. A Glasgow Coma Scale of 3, none of the patients will be conscious at the time of hospital admission.
  3. No previous cardiac arrest, as well as known or coexisting neurological disorders or neoplasms of the central nervous system.
  4. No history of psychiatric illness, no alcohol or drug dependency, and no psychotropic medication.
  5. Initiation of mild therapeutic hypothermia

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. hydrocephalus and shunt artifact
  2. severe movement artifacts
  3. intracerebral hemorrhage
  4. old large ischemic lesion

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
CPC < 3
Good neurological outcome
CPC >/= 3
Unvavourable neurologic outcome

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Cerebral performance categories (CPC)of <3
Time Frame: participants will be followed for the duration of intensive-care unit stay, an expected average of 2 weeks.
participants will be followed for the duration of intensive-care unit stay, an expected average of 2 weeks.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Cerebral performance categories (CPC)of <3
Time Frame: 6 Months
6 Months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Brain glucose metabolism
Time Frame: Day 1 after end of cooling period
Day 1 after end of cooling period
Clinical outcome (rehospitalization and death)
Time Frame: 3 years
3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Christopher Adlbrecht, MD, Medical University of Vienna

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 8, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 9, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

October 11, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 24, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 20, 2020

Last Verified

February 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • EK_Nr_1740/2013

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cardiac Arrest With Successful Resuscitation

3
Subscribe