Comparison Between Invasive Pressure Flow Study and Non-invasive Penile Cuff Test

November 28, 2019 updated by: KYU-SUNG LEE, Samsung Medical Center

To provide evidence of promising tests to noninvasively diagnose bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia.

  1. Penile cuff test provides a means of obtaining a urodynamic diagnosis with a high level of accuracy without the morbidity and expense of invasive Pressure flow study.
  2. Penile cuff test may be particularly useful in the counseling of patients prior to benign prostatic hyperplasia operation. Patients diagnosed as obstructed following a penile cuff test can be reassured that surgery has a high chance of resulting in symptomatic benefit

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

335

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Male patients with Low Urinary Tract Symptoms over 6 months.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Male patients with Low Urinary Tract Symptoms over 6 months. (International prostatic symptom score >= 12)
  2. Patients scheduled to have pressure flow study.
  3. Able to give fully informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with urologic malignancies such as prostate cancer and bladder cancer
  2. Patients underwent urethral, prostate surgery
  3. Patients with urethral stricture or bladder diverticulum or bladder neck contracture
  4. seems not to be appropriate to this study by the decision of investigators because of any other reasons

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Study Group

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Positive/Negative Predictive Value of Penile cuff test
Time Frame: 5 hours
5 hours
The proportion comparison of Good responder between obstructed and unobstructed patients in penile cuff test
Time Frame: up to 3 months
good responder: The reduction in the International Prostatic Symptom Scores of more than 50% from the initial scores 3 months after operation.
up to 3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The correlation of intra-vesical Pressure between Pressure flow study and penile cuff test
Time Frame: 5 hours
5 hours
The difference of Pain visual analogue scale score between two diagnostic tests
Time Frame: 5 hours
5 hours
The categorical change of penile cuff test normogram after BPH operation
Time Frame: up to 3 months
up to 3 months
The PSA level change after benign prostatic hyperplasia operation in obstructed and non-obstructed patients.
Time Frame: up to 3 months .
up to 3 months .
The changes of International Prostatic Symptom Scores after BPH operation.
Time Frame: up to 3 months
up to 3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 8, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 8, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

January 9, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 2, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 28, 2019

Last Verified

November 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bladder Outlet Obstruction

3
Subscribe