Impact of C3F8 or SF6 Use and Length of Face-down Positioning (7 vs 14 Days Respectively) in Macular Hole Surgery

July 25, 2016 updated by: CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval

The primary purpose of the study was to compare the macular hole closure and visual acuity gain following vitrectomy using SF6 gas tamponade with 7 days of face-down positioning versus C3F8 gas tamponade with 14 days of face-down positioning.

The secondary purpose was to report, in each group, the cumulative incidence of cataract development 1 year following macular hole surgery and the proportion of complications (*).

((*) hypertony, hypotony, retinal tear, retinal detachment and endophthalmitis) This prospective randomized study examined a 3 year period. The first patient was included in January 2010 and the last in November 2011. The 12-month follow-up spread out from March 2011 to December 2012. The first group included 31 patients who had undergone macular hole surgery using SF6 gas and who were advised to stay in face-down position for 7 days postoperatively (SF6 group). These patients were compared to 28 patients who had undergone macular hole surgery with C3F8 gas and who were advised to maintain a face-down position for 14 days. Patients in both groups underwent vitrectomy, internal limiting membrane peeling, and fluid-gas exchange using either SF6 or C3F8.

Preoperative data included the characterization of the hole with Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT), the best correct visual acuity (VA) recorded in number of letters using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart, classification of the cataract according to the LOCS III and the intraocular pressure IOP. Postoperative data included OCT confirmation of the closure at 6 weeks and 1 year, 1 year's best corrected VA recorded in number of letters (EDTRS chart) and determination of cataract development and extraction as needed.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

59

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Quebec
      • Québec, Quebec, Canada, G1S 4L8
        • Centre universitaire d'ophtalmologie, Hôpital du Saint-Sacrement, CHU de Québec

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

51 years to 83 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Idiopathic MH of stage 2-4 according to Gass classification (confirmed by fundoscopic examination and OCT) was included.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Exclusion criteria includes: patients with a chronic macular hole (symptoms more than 12 months duration), base diameter of the hole larger than 0.5 disc area diameter, medias opacities that prevent fundus visualisation until the second branches of central retinal artery, age-related macular degeneration ARMD, diabetic retinopathy, past history of retinal detachment or vitrectomy and corneal pathology disrupting vision.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: SF6 vitrectomy
The first group included 31 patients who had undergone MH surgery using SF6 gas and who were advised to stay in face-down position for 7 days postoperatively (SF6 group). Patients in both groups underwent 25 G pars plana vitrectomy, ILM peeling, fluid-air exchange followed by air-gas exchange with SF6 or C3F8. The internal limiting membrane was coloured with trypan blue or indocyanine green in equal proportion in both groups.
Active Comparator: C3F8 vitrectomy
The second group included 28 patients who had undergone MH surgery with C3F8 gas and who were advised to maintain a face-down position for 14 days. Patients in both groups underwent 25 G pars plana vitrectomy, ILM peeling, fluid-air exchange followed by air-gas exchange with SF6 or C3F8. The internal limiting membrane was coloured with trypan blue or indocyanine green in equal proportion in both groups.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Macular hole closure and visual acuity gain
Time Frame: 1 year
The primary purpose of the study was to compare the macular hole closure and visual acuity gain following vitrectomy using SF6 gas tamponade with 7 days of face-down positioning versus C3F8 gas tamponade with 14 days of face-down positioning.
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cumulative incidence of cataract development and proportion of complications
Time Frame: 1 year
The secondary purpose was to report, in each group, the cumulative incidence of cataract development 1 year following macular hole surgery and the proportion of complications.
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Benoit Cinq-Mars, MD, FRCS(C), Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec: Université Laval

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 25, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 25, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

February 27, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 26, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 25, 2016

Last Verified

February 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2012-1429, DR-002-1266

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cataract

3
Subscribe