A Multicenter Study of Outpatient Automated Blood Glucose Control With a Bihormonal Bionic Pancreas

October 19, 2017 updated by: Steven J. Russell, MD, PhD, Massachusetts General Hospital

This study will test the hypothesis that a wearable bionic pancreas system that automatically delivers insulin and glucagon can provide superior regulation of glycemia versus usual care for adults with type 1 diabetes.

Please note that all participants must work or attend school at one of the following campuses: Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, MA; University of Massachusetts Medical Center in Worcester, MA; University of North Carolina in Chapel Hill, NC; Stanford University in Palo Alto, CA.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

48

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Stanford, California, United States, 94305
        • Stanford University
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
        • Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) Diabetes Research Center
      • Worcester, Massachusetts, United States, 01655
        • UMASS Medical Center
    • North Carolina
      • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27514
        • University of North Carolina Chapel Hill

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥18 years and have had clinical type 1 diabetes for at least one year
  • Diabetes managed using an insulin pump for ≥ 6 months
  • Prescription medication regimen stable for > 1 month (except for medications that will not affect the safety of the study and are not expected to affect any outcome of the study, in the judgement of the site principal investigator).
  • Employee or student working or studying during most of the week at one of the participating campuses (Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, MA; University of Massachusetts Medical Center in Worcester, MA; University of North Carolina in Chapel Hill, NC; Stanford University in Palo Alto, CA)
  • Lives within a 30 minute drive-time radius of the central monitoring location for one of the study sites
  • Willing to remain within a 60 minute drive-time radius of the central monitoring location for one of the study sites during each of the 11-day study arms
  • Have someone over 18 years of age who lives with them, has access to where they sleep, is willing to be in the house when the subject is sleeping, and is willing to receive calls from the study staff and check the welfare of the study subject if telemetry shows a technical problem or severe biochemical hypoglycemia without subject response and the subject does not answer their telephone (up to two individuals can share this role, but they must be willing to carefully coordinate with each other and the subject so that one of them is clearly designated as having this responsibility at any given time)
  • Willing to wear two infusion sets and continuous glucose monitor (CGM) sensor and change sets frequently (at least one new glucagon infusion set daily)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to provide informed consent (e.g. impaired cognition or judgment)
  • Unable to safely comply with study procedures and reporting requirements (e.g. impairment of vision or dexterity that prevents safe operation of the bionic pancreas, impaired memory, unable to speak and read English)
  • Current participation in another diabetes-related clinical trial that, in the judgment of the principal investigator, will compromise the results of this study or the safety of the subject
  • Pregnancy [positive urine human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG)] breast feeding, plan to become pregnant in the immediate future, or sexually active without use of contraception
  • Need to go outside of the designated geographic boundaries during either arm of the study
  • Current alcohol abuse (intake averaging > 3 drinks daily in last 30 days), use of marijuana within 1 month of enrollment, or other substance abuse (use within the last 6 months of controlled substances other than marijuana without a prescription)
  • Unwilling or unable to refrain from drinking more than 2 drinks in an hour or more than 4 drinks in a day or use of marijuana during the trial
  • Unwilling or unable or to avoid use of drugs that may dull the sensorium, reduce sensitivity to symptoms of hypoglycemia, or hinder decision making during the period of participation in the study (use of beta blockers will be allowed as long as the dose is stable and the subject does not meet the criteria for hypoglycemia unawareness while taking that stable dose, but use of benzodiazepines or narcotics, even if by prescription, may be excluded according to the judgment of the principal investigator)
  • History of liver disease that is expected to interfere with the anti-hypoglycemia action of glucagon (e.g. liver failure or cirrhosis). Other liver disease (i.e. active hepatitis, steatosis, active biliary disease, any tumor of the liver, hemochromatosis, glycogen storage disease) may exclude the subject if it causes significant compromise to liver function or may do so in an unpredictable fashion.
  • Renal failure on dialysis
  • Personal history of cystic fibrosis, pancreatitis, pancreatic tumor, or any other pancreatic disease besides type 1 diabetes
  • Any known history of coronary artery disease including, but not limited to, history of myocardial infarction, stress test showing ischemia, history of angina, or history of intervention such as coronary artery bypass grafting, percutaneous coronary intervention, or enzymatic lysis of a presumed coronary occlusion)
  • Abnormal electrocardiogram (EKG) consistent with coronary artery disease or increased risk of malignant arrhythmia including, but not limited to, evidence of active ischemia, prior myocardial infarction, proximal left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) critical stenosis (Wellen's sign), prolonged QT interval (> 440 ms). Non-specific ST segment and T wave changes are not grounds for exclusion in the absence of symptoms or history of heart disease. A reassuring evaluation by a cardiologist after an abnormal EKG finding may allow participation.
  • Congestive heart failure (CHF) [established history of CHF, lower extremity edema, paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea, or orthopnea]
  • History of transient ischaemic attack (TIA) or stroke
  • Seizure disorder, history of any non-hypoglycemic seizure within the last two years, or ongoing treatment with anticonvulsants
  • History of hypoglycemic seizures or coma in the last year
  • History of pheochromocytoma: fractionated metanephrines will be tested in patients with history increasing the risk for a catecholamine secreting tumor:

    • episodic or treatment refractory (requiring 4 or more medications to achieve normotension) hypertension
    • paroxysms of tachycardia, pallor, or headache
    • personal or family history of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2A (MEN 2A), multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2B (MEN 2B), neurofibromatosis, or von Hippel-Lindau disease
  • History of adrenal disease or tumor
  • Hypertension with systolic blood pressure (BP) ≥160 mm Hg or diastolic BP ≥100 despite treatment
  • Untreated or inadequately treated mental illness (indicators would include symptoms such as psychosis, hallucinations, mania, and any psychiatric hospitalization in the last year), or treatment with anti-psychotic medications that are known to affect glucose regulation.
  • Electrically powered implants (e.g. cochlear implants, neurostimulators) that might be susceptible to radio-frequency (RF) interference
  • Unable to completely avoid acetaminophen for duration of study
  • History of adverse reaction to glucagon (including allergy) besides nausea and vomiting
  • Established history of allergy or severe reaction to adhesive or tape that must be used in the study
  • History of eating disorder such as anorexia, bulimia, or diabulemia or omission of insulin to manipulate weight
  • History of intentional, inappropriate administration of insulin leading to severe hypoglycemia requiring treatment
  • Use oral [e.g. thiazolidinediones, biguanides, sulfonylureas, glitinides, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors] anti-diabetic medications
  • Lives in or frequents areas with poor Verizon wireless network coverage (which would prevent remote monitoring)
  • Any factors that, in the opinion of the site principal investigator or overall principal investigator, would interfere with the safe completion of the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Bionic Pancreas
Bionic Pancreas diabetes management, a wearable bionic pancreas system that automatically delivers insulin and glucagon using a continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) device, for 11 days.
Active Comparator: Usual Care
Usual Care diabetes management, standard of care for diabetes including use of an insulin pump with or without CGM according to the participant's usual practice, for 11 days.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Continuous Glucose Monitoring Glucose (CGMG) Values During Days 2 to 11
Time Frame: Days 2 to 11 of each period
Glucose reading were taken every 5 minutes by the CGM. The glucose results on Days 2 to 11 were averaged.
Days 2 to 11 of each period
Percentage of Time Spent With CGMG Concentration < 60 mg/dL During Days 2 to 11
Time Frame: Days 2 to 11 of each period
Glucose reading were taken every 5 minutes by the CGM.The percentage of time that the glucose concentration was less than 60 mg/dL [3.3 millimoles/liter (mmol/L)] during Days 2 to 11 was calculated.
Days 2 to 11 of each period

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean CGMG Values
Time Frame: Day 1 and Days 1 to 11 in each period
Glucose reading were taken every 5 minutes by the CGM. The glucose results on Days 1 and Days 1 to 11 were averaged.
Day 1 and Days 1 to 11 in each period
Percentage of Time With CGMG Concentration by Ranges During Day 1
Time Frame: Day 1 of each period

Glucose reading were taken every 5 minutes by the CGM.The percentage of time that the glucose concentration was less than the following ranges were calculated:

< 50 mg/dL (2.8 mmol/L) < 60 mg/dL (3.3 mmol/L) < 70 mg/dL (3.9 mmol/L) 70 to 120 mg/dL (3.9 to 6.7 mmol/L) 70 to180 mg/dl (3.9 to 10.0 mmol/L) > 180 mg/dL (10.0 mmol/L) > 250 mg/dL (13.9 mmol/L)

Day 1 of each period
Percentage of Time With CGMG Concentration by Ranges During Days 1 to 11
Time Frame: Days 1 to 11 of each period

Glucose reading were taken every 5 minutes by the CGM.The percentage of time that the glucose concentration was less than the following ranges were calculated:

< 50 mg/dL (2.8 mmol/L) < 70 mg/dL (3.9 mmol/L) 70 to 120 mg/dL (3.9 to 6.7 mmol/L) 70 to180 mg/dl (3.9 to 10.0 mmol/L) > 180 mg/dL (10.0 mmol/L) > 250 mg/dL (13.9 mmol/L)

Days 1 to 11 of each period
Percentage of Time With CGMG Concentration by Ranges During Days 2 to 11
Time Frame: Days 2 to 11 of each period

Glucose reading were taken every 5 minutes by the CGM.The percentage of time that the glucose concentration was less than the following ranges were calculated:

< 50 mg/dL (2.8 mmol/L) < 70 mg/dL (3.9 mmol/L) 70 to 120 mg/dL (3.9 to 6.7 mmol/L) 70 to180 mg/dl (3.9 to 10.0 mmol/L) > 180 mg/dL (10.0 mmol/L) > 250 mg/dL (13.9 mmol/L)

Days 2 to 11 of each period
Percentage of Participants With Mean CGMG < 154 mg/dl
Time Frame: Day 1, Days 2 to11, Days 1 to11 of each period
Glucose reading were taken every 5 minutes by the CGM. The glucose readings were averaged. 154 mg/dL was the estimated average glucose corresponding to a Glycosylated Hemoglobin A1C of 7%.
Day 1, Days 2 to11, Days 1 to11 of each period
Number of Hypoglycemic Events (< 70 mg/dL, < 60 mg/dL, <50 mg/dL)
Time Frame: Days 1-11
A series of hypoglycemic measurements is defined as a single event until there is a break of ≥ 30 minutes between measurements below the defined thresholds of < 70, < 60, and <50 mg/dL.
Days 1-11
Percentage of Days That CGM Was Used by Participants as Part of Their Usual Care
Time Frame: Days 1-11 of each period
The percentage of days that participants reported the CGM device was being worn and working properly is reported.
Days 1-11 of each period
Glycated Albumin on Day 12
Time Frame: Day 12 of each period
Day 12 of each period
1,5-anhydroglucitol on Day 12
Time Frame: Day 12 of each period
Day 12 of each period
Anti-Insulin and Anti-Glucagon Antibodies on Day 12
Time Frame: Day 12 of each period
Day 12 of each period
Number of Participants With Severe Hypoglycemic Events
Time Frame: 11 days of each period
A severe hypoglycemic event is an event where the participant is unable to self-treat and requires the assistance of another person.
11 days of each period
Number of Episodes of Symptomatic Hypoglycemia
Time Frame: Day 1, Days 1 to 11 and Days 2 to 11 of each period
The number of episodes of symptomatic hypoglycemia were reported daily by the participant. The average number of episodes of symptomatic hypoglycemia per day was calculated.
Day 1, Days 1 to 11 and Days 2 to 11 of each period
Number of Reported Carbohydrate Interventions for Hypoglycemia
Time Frame: Day 1, Days 1 to 11 and Days 2 to 11 of each period
The number of carbohydrate interventions for hypoglycemia were reported daily by the participant. The average number of carbohydrate interventions per day is reported.
Day 1, Days 1 to 11 and Days 2 to 11 of each period
Total Grams of Carbohydrate Taken for Hypoglycemia
Time Frame: Day 1, Days 1 to 11 and Days 2 to 11 of each period

The total grams of carbohydrate taken for hypoglycemia as reported daily by the participant were averaged.

The total number of grams of carbohydrate taken for hypoglycemia were reported daily by the participant. The total number of grams of carbohydrate taken are reported.

Day 1, Days 1 to 11 and Days 2 to 11 of each period
Insulin Total Daily Dose
Time Frame: Day 1, Days 1 to 11, Days 2 to 11 of each period
Insulin total daily dose is reported in units per kilogram per day (U/kg/day).
Day 1, Days 1 to 11, Days 2 to 11 of each period
Glucagon Total Daily Dose Levels in the Bionic Pancreas Arm
Time Frame: Day 1, Days 2 to 11, Days 1 to 11 of each period
Glucagon dose level is reported in micrograms per kilogram of body mass per day (µg/kg/day).
Day 1, Days 2 to 11, Days 1 to 11 of each period
Mean Glucose Target Set by User (Time-weighted Average Over Study Period) in the Bionic Pancreas Arm
Time Frame: Day 1, Days 2 to 11, Days 1 to11, Overall, Daytime, Nighttime of each period
Day 1, Days 2 to 11, Days 1 to11, Overall, Daytime, Nighttime of each period
Percentage of Time Bionic Pancreas Off-line or Not Functioning Properly
Time Frame: 11 days
Not functioning properly includes issues due to system crash, communication problems between CGM and bionic pancreas, communication problems between bionic pancreas and pumps and pump malfunction.
11 days
Mean Nausea Index Score Using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: Day 1, Days 1 to 11, Days 2 to 11 and each individual day 2 to 11 of each period
Participants rated their nausea using a 0 to 10 centimeter (cm) VAS where 0=least severe nausea to 10=most severe nausea. The average nausea index scores during Days 1 to 11 and Days 2 to 11 were calculated.
Day 1, Days 1 to 11, Days 2 to 11 and each individual day 2 to 11 of each period
Change From Baseline in Body Weight
Time Frame: Baseline and Day 12 of each period
The change in body weight collected at Day 12 relative to Baseline. A negative change from Baseline indicates a reduction in body weight and a positive change from Baseline indicates an increase in body weight.
Baseline and Day 12 of each period
Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin
Time Frame: Baseline and Day 12 of each period
The change in the value of hemoglobin collected at Day 12 relative to Baseline. A negative change from Baseline indicates a reduction in hemoglobin and a positive change from Baseline indicates an increase in hemoglobin.
Baseline and Day 12 of each period
Number of Participants With Skin Rash
Time Frame: 11 days of each period
11 days of each period

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Reliability Index, Calculated as Percent of Possible Values Actually Recorded by CGM
Time Frame: 11 days
11 days
Number of Unscheduled Infusion Set Replacements
Time Frame: 11 days
11 days
Mean Daily Basal Insulin Dose
Time Frame: Day 1, Days 2 to 11, each individual day 2 to 11 of each period
Daily basal insulin dose reported in Units per kilogram per day (U/kg/day).
Day 1, Days 2 to 11, each individual day 2 to 11 of each period
Mean Daily Bolus Insulin Dose
Time Frame: Day 1, Days 1 to 11, Days 2 to 11, each individual day 2 to 11 of each period
Daily bolus insulin dose reported in Units per kilogram per day (U/kg/day).
Day 1, Days 1 to 11, Days 2 to 11, each individual day 2 to 11 of each period
CGM Mean Absolute Relative Differences (MARD) Versus Time-stamped Blood Glucose (BG) Values From Meter Downloads
Time Frame: 11 days
This outcome measure compares the time stamped PG values from the glucose meter to the corresponding CGM glucose value to determine the overall accuracy of the CGM.
11 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 18, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 18, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

March 20, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 22, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 19, 2017

Last Verified

October 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetes Mellitus Type 1

Clinical Trials on Bionic Pancreas

3
Subscribe