Randomized Controlled Feasibility Trial of the Fearon Algorithm to Improve Management of Unstable Warfarin

April 4, 2018 updated by: McMaster University

A Single-site, Randomized Controlled Feasibility Trial of the Fearon Algorithm to Improve Management of Patients With Unstable Warfarin Effect.

Patients on warfarin but with unstable international normalized ratio (INR) will be recruited to a randomized trial comparing dosing based on an algorithm (Fearon algorithm, named after the mathematician Michael Fearon), which uses historical data to estimate patients' sensitivity to warfarin and to dose changes as well as the lag time until a dose adjustment takes effect, or to the investigators standard management Main outcome is improvement in time in therapeutic range.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Patients with very variable INRs resulting in a low proportion of time in therapeutic range (TTR) have a higher risk of both bleeding complications and thromboembolic events. A good TTR is generally considered to be over 60% and "excellent TTR" is above 72% of time in range. The investigators will recruit patients with a TTR below 50%.

The Fearon algorithm provides a more thorough understanding of the individual responses to changes in warfarin dose and with a personalized nomogram for dose adjustments and timing of laboratory tests the investigators have an opportunity to improve the TTR and on a larger scale to reduce clinically important adverse events. Before embarking on a large randomized trial with this revised Fearon algorithm-derived nomogram this pilot study with a randomized, open-label design will be performed to demonstrate proof of principle.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

42

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8L 2X2
        • Thrombosis Service, HHS-General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with mechanical heart valve prosthesis managed for the warfarin therapy by the Thrombosis Service at HHS-General Hospital.
  • Treated with warfarin for at least 1 year.
  • Therapeutic INR range 2.0-3.0 or 2.5-3.5.
  • TTR in the lowest quartile

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known poor compliance due to for example alcohol abuse or cognitive impairment
  • Refusal to provide written informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Fearon algorithm dosing
Warfarin adjustment using the Fearon algorithm
All available historical data will be used to calculate with the Fearon algorithm the individual sensitivity to warfarin and to dose changes as well as lag time until a dose adjustment reaches full effect. Based on this a personal dosing nomogram will be developed and provided to the investigator and to the patients. This nomogram will be used during 6 month but override is possible if the investigator feels that the suggestion from the nomogram is unsafe.
Active Comparator: Standard dosing
Warfarin adjustment using standard dosing
Patients will receive warfarin dosing instructions from a trained nurse using fixed nomograms and computer-based dosing suggestion.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Improvement in TTR
Time Frame: 6 months
The percent units of TTR during the 6 months will be compared with the percent units TTR in the previous year
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of patients with improvement in TTR
Time Frame: 6 months
Proportion of included patients with TTR improvement of more than 5 percent units
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

February 3, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 14, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 16, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

October 17, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 6, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 4, 2018

Last Verified

March 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Warfarin adjustment using the Fearon algorithm

3
Subscribe