A Study to Assess the Benefit of Treatment Beyond Progression With Enzalutamide in Men Who Are Starting Treatment With Docetaxel After Worsening of Their Prostate Cancer When Taking Enzalutamide Alone (PRESIDE)

April 4, 2024 updated by: Astellas Pharma Europe Ltd.

A Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase IIIb Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Continuing Enzalutamide in Chemotherapy Naïve Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer Patients Treated With Docetaxel Plus Prednisolone Who Have Progressed on Enzalutamide Alone

The purpose of the study was to understand if there was benefit in continued treatment with a medicine called enzalutamide, when starting treatment with docetaxel and prednisolone (a standard chemotherapy for prostate cancer), after the prostate cancer had gotten worse when treated with enzalutamide alone.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The study was conducted in consecutive periods of open label treatment with enzalutamide followed by randomized double-blind treatment with continued enzalutamide or placebo, in combination with docetaxel and prednisolone.

Open Label (Period 1)

Participants received open label treatment (OL) with enzalutamide. At week 13, all participants were assessed by prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and imaging. Participants with no confirmed PSA response or evidence of radiographic progression were ineligible for participation in Period 2 and typically had safety follow up; however, Period 1 treatment continued for some participants as long as the investigator considered it to be of clinical benefit (stopping on initiation of any new antineoplastic therapy). Participants with confirmed PSA response continued Period 1 until disease progression.

Enrollment to Period 2 ceased after approximately 274 participants had been enrolled or 182 primary endpoint events had been reached, whichever occurred first. Participants who were not randomized into period 2 at this time continued to receive open label treatment in an extension period.

Randomization (Double Blind [DB]) (Period 2)

Participants with confirmed disease progression on enzalutamide alone who continued to meet all eligibility criteria proceeded to randomization. Treatment allocation was in a 1:1 ratio, stratified by disease progression in Period 1 to the following treatments:

  • Enzalutamide with docetaxel and prednisolone
  • Placebo with docetaxel and prednisolone

Any ongoing participants in Period 2 at the point of unblinding in the enzalutamide+docetaxel arm that were still receiving and benefitting from enzalutamide treatment, had the option to continue treatment via an extension period.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

688

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Linz, Austria, 4010
        • Site AT43004
      • Vienna, Austria, 1090
        • Site AT43001
      • Bonheiden, Belgium, 2820
        • Site BE32003
      • Liege, Belgium, 4000
        • Site BE32002
      • Ottignies, Belgium, 1340
        • Site BE32004
      • Brno, Czechia, 656 91
        • Site CZ42004
      • Olomouc, Czechia, 77520
        • Site CZ42003
      • Plzeň -Lochotín, Czechia, 30460
        • Site CZ42002
      • Praha 2, Czechia, 12808
        • Site CZ42001
      • Albi, France, 81000
        • Site FR33012
      • Montpellier, France, 34298 cedex 5
        • Site FR33003
      • Nîmes, France, 30907 cedex 2
        • Site FR33002
      • Paris, France, 75014
        • Site FR33008
      • Paris, France, 75014
        • Site FR33014
      • Plerin, France, 22190
        • Site FR33004
      • Quimper, France, 29000
        • Site FR33013
      • Reims, France, 51056
        • Site FR33011
      • Suresnes, France, 92151
        • Site FR33005
      • Aachen, Germany, 52074
        • Site DE49008
      • Bergisch Gladbach, Germany, 51465
        • Site DE49010
      • Hannover, Germany, 30625
        • Site DE49001
      • Heidelberg, Germany, 69120
        • Site DE49006
      • Mannheim, Germany, 68167
        • Site DE49003
      • Munster, Germany, 48149
        • Site DE49002
      • Tübingen, Germany, 72076
        • Site DE49015
      • Ulm, Germany, 89075
        • Site DE49017
      • Wuppertal, Germany, 42103
        • Site DE49004
    • Baden-Württemberg
      • Nürtingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany, 72622
        • Site DE49018
      • Athens, Greece, 14564
        • Site GR30003
      • Athens, Greece, 155 62
        • Site GR30006
      • Thessaloniki, Greece, 54007
        • Site GR30005
    • Crete
      • Heraklion, Crete, Greece, 70013
        • Site GR30001
      • Heraklion, Crete, Greece, 71403
        • Site GR30004
      • Arezzo, Italy, 52100
        • Site IT39001
      • Brescia, Italy, 25126
        • Site IT39012
      • Milano, Italy, 20100
        • Site IT39003
      • Naples, Italy, 80131
        • Site IT39008
      • Pavia, Italy, 27100
        • Site IT39010
      • Roma, Italy, 00128
        • Site IT39005
      • Rome, Italy, 161
        • Site IT39004
      • Terni, Italy, 05100
        • Site IT39002
      • Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1066 CX
        • Site NL31002
      • Blaricum, Netherlands, 1261 AN
        • Site NL31007
      • Hoofddorp, Netherlands, 2134 TM
        • Site NL31004
      • Nieuwegein, Netherlands, 3435 CM
        • Site NL31010
      • Rotterdam, Netherlands, 3045 PM
        • Site NL31003
      • Drammen, Norway, 3004
        • Site NO47005
      • Kristiansand, Norway, 4615
        • Site NO47001
      • Stavanger, Norway, 4011
        • Site NO47004
      • Gdańsk, Poland, 80-952
        • Site PL48004
      • Krakow, Poland, 31-501
        • Site PL48003
      • Lodz, Poland, 93-513
        • Site PL48002
      • Warszawa, Poland, 02-507
        • Site PL48006
      • Warszawa, Poland, 04-141
        • Site PL48005
      • Moscow, Russian Federation, 105077
        • Site RU70002
      • Moscow, Russian Federation, 115478
        • Site RU70001
      • Moscow, Russian Federation, 125284
        • Site RU70003
      • St. Petersburg, Russian Federation, 197022
        • Site RU70005
      • St. Petersburg, Russian Federation, 197758
        • Site RU70006
    • Kaluga
      • Obninsk, Kaluga, Russian Federation, 24903
        • Site RU70004
      • Lugo, Spain, 27003
        • Site ES34005
      • Madrid, Spain, 28041
        • Site ES34002
      • Madrid, Spain, 28007
        • Site ES34003
      • Madrid, Spain, 28040
        • Site ES34001
      • Madrid, Spain
        • Site ES34010
      • Malaga, Spain, 29010
        • Site ES34007
      • Murcia, Spain, 30008
        • Site ES34009
      • Santander, Spain, 39008
        • Site ES34008
      • Sevilla, Spain, 41013
        • Site ES34004
      • Valencia, Spain, 46009
        • Site ES34006
      • Göteborg, Sweden, 413 45
        • Site SE46002
      • Kalmar, Sweden, 39185
        • Site SE46005
      • Solna, Sweden, 171 76
        • Site SE46003
      • Uppsala, Sweden, 751 85
        • Site SE46004
      • Zurich, Switzerland, CH-8038
        • Site CH41009
    • Tessin
      • Locarno, Tessin, Switzerland, 6600
        • Site CH41005
      • Ankara, Turkey, 06500
        • Site TR90001
      • Istanbul, Turkey, 34722
        • Site TR90003
      • Izmir, Turkey, 35340
        • Site TR90002
      • Aberdeen, United Kingdom, AB25 2ZN
        • Site GB44010
      • Cambridge, United Kingdom, CB2 0QQ
        • Site GB44004
      • Cardiff, United Kingdom, CF4 7XL
        • Site GB44018
      • Exeter, United Kingdom
        • Site GB44014
      • London, United Kingdom, SE1 9RT
        • Site GB44003
      • Northwood, United Kingdom, HA62RN
        • Site GB44020
      • Norwich, United Kingdom, NR4 7UY
        • Site GB44015
      • Nottingham, United Kingdom, NG5 1PB
        • Site GB44002
      • Swansea, United Kingdom, SA2 8QA
        • Site GB44017
      • Wirral, United Kingdom, CH63 4JY
        • Site GB44007

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the prostate without neuroendocrine differentiation or small cell features;
  • Ongoing androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist or antagonist at a stable dose and schedule within 4 weeks of initiation of investigational medicinal product (IMP), or bilateral orchiectomy (i.e., surgical or medical castration);
  • Metastatic disease documented by at least 2 bone lesions on bone scan, or soft tissue disease documented by computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI);
  • Progressive disease at study entry defined as the following occurring in the setting of castrate levels of testosterone: Prostate specific antigen (PSA) progression defined by a minimum of three rising PSA levels with an interval of ≥ 1 week between each determination.
  • Asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic prostate cancer (Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) question 3 score of < 4);
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score of 0-1;
  • Estimated life expectancy of ≥ 12 months;
  • Be suitable and willing to receive chemotherapy as part of the trial;
  • Able to swallow the IMP and comply with study requirements;
  • Subject agreed not to participate in another interventional study while on treatment.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior treatment with the following agents for the treatment of prostate cancer: Aminoglutethimide; Ketoconazole; Abiraterone; Enzalutamide or participation in a clinical trial of enzalutamide; 223Ra, 89Sr, 153Sm, 186Re/188Re; Immunomodulatory therapies; Cytotoxic chemotherapy; Participation in a clinical trial of an investigational agent that inhibits the AR or androgen synthesis unless the treatment was placebo;
  • Current or prior treatment within 4 weeks prior to initiation of investigational medicinal product (IMP) with the following agents for the treatment of prostate cancer: Antiandrogens; 5-α reductase inhibitors; Estrogens; Anabolic steroids; Drugs with antiandrogenic properties; Progestational agents;
  • Subject had received investigational therapy within 28 days or 5 half-lives whichever was longer, prior to initiation of IMP;
  • Use of opiate analgesia for pain from prostate cancer within 4 weeks prior to initiation of IMP;
  • Radiation therapy to bone lesions or prostatic bed within 4 weeks prior to initiation of IMP;
  • Major surgery within 4 weeks prior to initiation of IMP;
  • History of seizure or any condition that may predispose to seizures at any time in the past. History of loss of consciousness or transient ischemic attack within 12 months prior to Screening;
  • Known or suspected brain metastasis or active leptomeningeal disease;
  • History of another malignancy within the previous 5 years other than non-melanoma skin cancer;
  • Clinically significant cardiovascular disease;
  • Gastrointestinal disorders affecting absorption;
  • Medical contraindications to the use of prednisolone or docetaxel;
  • Allergies to any of the active ingredients or excipients in the study drugs

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Enzalutamide
Participants received an OL treatment with enzalutamide 160 milligrams (mg) capsules, orally once daily from day 1 in period 1 until randomization to period 2, confirmation of ineligibility for period 2, intolerable toxicity, withdrawal, or death. Participants with confirmed disease progression on enzalutamide in period 1 and who continued to meet all eligibility criteria received enzalutamide 160 mg capsules, orally once daily in combination with docetaxel 75 milligrams per square meter (mg/m^2) in a one-hour infusion every 3 weeks and prednisolone 5 mg orally twice daily, DB period 2. Docetaxel and prednisolone were administered up to 10 cycles (3 weeks/cycle) or more as assessed by the investigator. Enzalutamide was administered until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, withdrawal or death. Participants could continue the extension period, until investigator or participant decided to stop or disease progression, intolerable toxicity, withdrawal or death.
intravenous infusion
Oral
Other Names:
  • Xtandi
  • ASP9785
Oral
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Participants received an OL treatment with enzalutamide 160 mg capsules, orally once daily from day 1 in period 1 until randomization to period 2, confirmation of ineligibility for period 2, intolerable toxicity, withdrawal, or death. Participants with confirmed disease progression on enzalutamide in period 1 and who continued to meet all eligibility criteria received placebo matched to enzalutamide, orally once daily in combination with docetaxel 75 mg/m^2 in a one-hour infusion every 3 weeks and prednisolone 5 mg orally twice daily, in period 2. Docetaxel and prednisolone were administered up to 10 cycles (3 weeks/cyle) or more as assessed by the investigator. Enzalutamide was administered until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, withdrawal or death. Participants could continue the extension period, until investigator or participant decided to stop or disease progression, intolerable toxicity, withdrawal or death.
Oral
intravenous infusion
Oral

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progression Free Survival (PFS)
Time Frame: From date of randomization to the earliest of either documented disease progression (median duration: 35 weeks)
PFS: time from randomization (Period 2 Week 1) to earliest progression event. Progression is defined as radiographic progression, unequivocal clinical progression, or death on study. Radiographic progression is defined for bone disease by appearance of ≥ 2 new lesions on whole-body radionuclide bone scan per Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 2 (PCWG2) criteria (i.e., unconfirmed progressive disease) that needs to be confirmed in the next assessment (i.e., progressive disease in the next assessment) or for soft tissue disease by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1. Unequivocal clinical progression is defined as new onset cancer pain requiring chronic administration of opiate analgesia or deterioration from prostate cancer of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status score to ≥ 3, or initiation of subsequent lines of cytotoxic chemotherapy or radiation therapy or surgical intervention due to complications of tumor progression.
From date of randomization to the earliest of either documented disease progression (median duration: 35 weeks)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Progression
Time Frame: From date of randomization to the first PSA value (median duration: 35 weeks)
Time to PSA progression, defined as the time from randomization (Period 2 Week 1) to the date of the first PSA value in Period 2 demonstrating progression (Period 2). The PSA progression date is defined as the date that a ≥ 25% increase and an absolute increase of ≥ 2 ng/mL above the nadir recorded in Period 2 is documented, which must be confirmed by a second consecutive value obtained at least 3 weeks later.
From date of randomization to the first PSA value (median duration: 35 weeks)
Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Response
Time Frame: Randomization, Week 13, any time after randomization in Period 2 (median of 35 weeks)
PSA response, defined as a decrease in percentage change from randomization (Period 2 Week 1) of 50% or more. PSA response was derived at Week 13 and at any time after randomization in Period 2. PSA response at any time is defined as a decrease in percentage change from randomization (Period 2 Week 1) at any time after randomization of 50% or more. Percentage of participants with PSA response was reported.
Randomization, Week 13, any time after randomization in Period 2 (median of 35 weeks)
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
Time Frame: From date of randomization up to median duration of 35 weeks
ORR, defined as the best overall radiographic response after randomization (Period 2 Week 1) as per Investigator assessments of response for soft tissue disease per RECIST 1.1, in participants who had a measurable tumor. ORR was reported as the percentage of participants with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). CR was defined as disappearance of all target and nontarget lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or nontarget) must have reduction in short axis to < 10 mm from baseline measurement. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters (longest for nonnodal lesions, short axis for nodal lesions) of target lesions taking as reference to the baseline sum of diameters.
From date of randomization up to median duration of 35 weeks
Time to Pain Progression
Time Frame: From date of randomization up to median duration of 35 weeks
The time to an increase of >=30% from randomization (Period 2 Week 1) in average BPI-SF item scores (items 3, 4, 5, 6) at two consecutive evaluations >=3 weeks apart without decrease in analgesic score according to the World health Organization (WHO). Only participants with an average pain intensity item score >=4 were considered. The BPI-SF was an instrument to document pain-related functional impairment and contains 7 questions which included pain intensity [(items 3, 4, 5 and 6): worst pain, least pain, average pain and current pain, with scales from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine)] and pain interference ](items 9A to 9G): general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep and enjoyment of life, with scales from 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes)]. The BPI-SF total score for pain intensity was calculated as the mean of the 4 scores for the 4 items of pain intensity.
From date of randomization up to median duration of 35 weeks
Time to Opiate Use for Cancer-related Pain
Time Frame: From date of randomization up to median duration of 35 weeks
Time to opiate use for cancer-related pain, defined as the time from randomization (Period 2 Week 1) to initiation of chronic administration of opiate analgesia [parenteral opiate use for ≥7 days or use of WHO Analgesic Ladder Level 3 oral opiates for ≥3 weeks].
From date of randomization up to median duration of 35 weeks
Time to First Skeletal-related Event (SRE)
Time Frame: From date of randomization up to median duration of 35 weeks
Time to first SRE, defined as the time from randomization (Period 2 Week 1) to radiation therapy or surgery to bone, pathologic bone fracture, spinal cord compression, or change of antineoplastic therapy to treat bone pain.
From date of randomization up to median duration of 35 weeks
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Prostate (FACT-P)
Time Frame: Period 2: Baseline, weeks 1, 13, 25, 37, 49, 61, 73, 85, 97, 109, 121, 133, 145, 157, 169, 181
FACT-P quality of life questionnaire is a multi-dimensional, self-reported quality of life instrument specifically designed for use with prostate cancer participants. It consists of 27 core items which assess participant function in four domains rated on 0 to 4 Likert-type scale: physical well-being (PWB) (7 items; 0 [worst] to 4 [better], score range 0-28), social/family well-being (SWB) (7 items; 0 [worst] to 4 [better], score range 0-28), emotional well-being (EWB) (6 items; 0 [worst] to 4 [better], score range 0-24), and functional well-being (FWB) (7 items; 0 [worst] to 4 [better], score range 0-28), which is further supplemented by 12 site-specific items to assess for prostate-related symptoms (Prostate Cancer Subscale [PCS] 12 items rated on Likert-type scale 0 [worst] to 4 [better], score range 0-48). The total domain scores and PCS subscale score are then combined to a global quality of life score ranging between 0 to 156; higher scores representing better quality of life.
Period 2: Baseline, weeks 1, 13, 25, 37, 49, 61, 73, 85, 97, 109, 121, 133, 145, 157, 169, 181
Change From Baseline in EuroQOL 5-dimension 5-level Questionnaire [EQ-5D-5L] Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: Period 2: Baseline, weeks 1, 13, 25, 37, 49, 61, 73, 85, 97, 109, 121, 133, 145, 157, 169, 181
The EQ-5D-5L VAS records the participant's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale, where the endpoints are labelled from 0 (worst health imaginable) to 100 (best health imaginable).
Period 2: Baseline, weeks 1, 13, 25, 37, 49, 61, 73, 85, 97, 109, 121, 133, 145, 157, 169, 181

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Medical Director, Astellas Pharma Europe Ltd.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 30, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

March 13, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 7, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 7, 2014

First Posted (Estimated)

November 11, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 5, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 4, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Access to anonymized individual participant level data collected during the study, in addition to study-related supporting documentation, is planned for studies conducted with approved product indications and formulations, as well as compounds terminated during development. Studies conducted with product indications or formulations that remain active in development are assessed after study completion to determine if Individual Participant Data can be shared. Conditions and exceptions are described under the Sponsor Specific Details for Astellas on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Access to participant level data is offered to researchers after publication of the primary manuscript (if applicable) and is available as long as Astellas has legal authority to provide the data.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Researchers must submit a proposal to conduct a scientifically relevant analysis of the study data. The research proposal is reviewed by an Independent Research Panel. If the proposal is approved, access to the study data is provided in a secure data sharing environment after receipt of a signed Data Sharing Agreement.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer

Clinical Trials on Placebo

3
Subscribe