Improving Bowel Cleansing With a Smart Phone Application

October 13, 2016 updated by: Vicente Lorenzo-Zúñiga García

Improving the Quality of Colonoscopy Bowel Preparation Using a Smart Phone Application

Getting ready for a colonoscopy is difficult and involves a lot of steps. The information given to patients is very important to adherence to treatment. The investigators have created a novel smart phone application (SPA) aimed to increased bowel preparation quality and patient satisfaction, using different educational tools.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background: Getting ready for a colonoscopy is difficult and involves a lot of steps. The information given to patients is very important to adherence to treatment. The investigators have created a novel smart phone application (SPA) aimed to increased bowel preparation quality and patient satisfaction, using different educational tools.

Methods: The investigators have performed a prospective, endoscopist-blinded, randomized, controlled trial. The investigators have enrolled 260 outpatients owners of a smartphone. Patients were randomly allocated to two different protocols: instructions provided by SPA (SPA group; n=108) or written instructions with visual aids (control group; n=152). All procedures were performed in afternoon time and patients received the same purgative regimen (2-L PEG solution plus ascorbic acid), in a full-dose same-day regimen. The day before colonoscopy (Baseline), patients initiated low fiber diet. The study was designed to detect an improvement in quality of bowel preparation using the Harefield Cleansing Scale (HCS) scale. The effect of protocol on patient satisfaction was assessed with a specific questionnaire at time of the colonoscopy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

260

Phase

  • Phase 4

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 90 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Elective colonoscopy
  • Owners of a smartphone

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No owners of a smartphone

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Smart Phone Application (SPA) Group
Patients assigned to SPA group were instructed on how to free-download the application onto their smartphone. Each patient enters the date and time of his colonoscopy and timed alerts appeared on the phone to alert the patient of the next step in bowel preparation. In addition to the alerts, the app assists in bowel preparation by explaining the procedure, providing tips, examples of low fiber diet, and displaying pictures of preparation quality and educational video to explain how to prepare the purgative solution.Finally, the patient can obtain a checklist to confirm all steps.
Bowel preparation was evaluated using the Harefield Cleansing Scale (HCS). The scale was the primary outcome measure
Active Comparator: Control Group
Written instructions with visual aids explaining the procedure and when to begin self-administration of the bowel solution
written instructions with visual aids explaining the procedure and when to begin self-administration of the bowel solution (control group).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Bowel Preparation Was Evaluated Using the Harefield Cleansing Scale (HCS). The Scale Was the Primary Outcome Measure
Time Frame: Day 1
The quality of bowel cleansing is evaluated after colonoscopy (Day 1). Baseline the patients initiated low fiber diet in the 24 hours prior to colonoscopy. The HCS uses a 5-point qualitative scale in 5 separate colon segments. HCS is the sum of 5 segments, ranging from 0 (worst possible outcome) to 20 (best possible outcome). Global score assesses the quality of bowel cleansing: Successful (A or B) / unsuccessful (C or D). A: All segments scored 3 or 4; B: One or more segments scored 2; C: One or more segments scored 1; and D: One or more segments scored 0.
Day 1

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Satisfaction Were Assessed With a Specific Questionnaire
Time Frame: Day 1
Patient satisfaction were assessed with a specific questionnaire before colonoscopy. Patients were asked if they used the application and their satisfaction with the app. Again, the endoscopist was blinded to the answers. The items read as follows: (1) "Do you have experience with a previous colonoscopy?"; (2) "Have you used the phone application?"; (3) "How easy was the preparation for colonoscopy?"; (4) "Which is your level of satisfaction with the bowel preparation?"; (5) "Would you like to repeat the same preparation in the future?"; (6) "Did you have any difficulty with the preparation?". Patient responses to the questionnaire were categorical (yes or no; questions 1, 2, 5, and 6) or numerical scale answers (0 to 10), from very difficult or very bad (0 or close to 0) to very easy or very good (10 or close to 10) (items 3 and 4).
Day 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Vicente Lorenzo-Zúñiga Garcíaa, M.D.; Ph.D., Germans Trias i Pujol Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 24, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 25, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

December 1, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 14, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 13, 2016

Last Verified

January 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CEI071114

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mobile Applications

Clinical Trials on Smart Phone Application

3
Subscribe