Application of Bioimpedance Spectroscopy in Taiwan Dialysis Patients

December 29, 2015 updated by: An Hsin QingShui Clinic

Effect of Post-dialysis Weight Evaluated With Bioimpedance Spectroscopy on Dialysis Morbidities and Clinical Outcomes in Hemodialysis Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

A reasonable and simple algorithm was used to guide the dry weight determination with Body Composition Monitor with the principle of Bioimpedance Spectroscopy (BCM-BIS) and analyze the feasibility of this algorithm and evaluate the influence of BCM-BIS-guided fluid management on the incidence of dialysis morbidities and clinical outcomes in maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

298 MHD patients in 6 hemodialysis centers in Taiwan were enrolled in this randomized controlled study. All the participants were randomized into study group ( dry weight (DW) determined by BCM-BIS) and control group ( dry weight determined by clinical symptoms) with stratification by diabetes mellitus and centers. Body composition monitor based on bioimpedance spectroscopy (BCM-BIS) was performed monthly and concomitant biochemical data and clinical outcomes were collected. Intra-dialysis complications were recorded in every dialysis session. Primary outcome was all-cause hospitalization. Secondary outcomes included 1) complications during DW adjustment 2) intra-dialysis morbidities 3) hypertension 4) mortality 5) acute fluid overload (AFO) or cardiovascular (CV)-related events. The clinical feasibility of the BCM-BIS algorithm was also inspected. Statistical methods: a software (SAS) 9.3 was used for statistical analysis in this study. R 3.0 was used for graphic presentation of parts of the results. Relative risk, incidence rate ratio and Fisher's exact test were used to compare the discrete outcomes in both groups. Survival analysis was used for time-related events. Repeated-measured and longitudinal data were analyzed with the generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) through the procedure for continuous variables (PROC MIXED) and for discrete variables (PROC GLIMMIX) in SAS.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

298

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

MHD patients with age ≥ 18 and dialysis vintage ≥ 3 months

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. coronary stents or pacemaker implantation
  2. metallic devices in body, such as artificial joints or pins
  3. contralateral or bilateral amputations
  4. pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Study group
Dry weight determined by performing Bioimpedance Spectroscopy (intervention is the performance of this tool)
Bioimpedance Spectroscopy is a safe tool to evaluate the fluid status in hemodialysis patients.
Placebo Comparator: Control group
Dry weight determined by clinical symptoms

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
All-cause Hospitalization
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Complications During DW Adjustment
Time Frame: 1 year
we wanted to compared whether the dialysis-related complications are different when DW (dry weight) is adjusted, no matter according to BCM (body composition monitor) results or clinical judgement, in both groups. The result is expressed as the percentage of months in which complications happened when DW adjustment presented (using total months which DW adjustments are present as denominator).
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 22, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 22, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

December 25, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 2, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 29, 2015

Last Verified

July 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • ABISAD-3

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Fluid Overload

Clinical Trials on Bioimpedance Spectroscopy

3
Subscribe