Intraoperative Anesthesia Care Transition Checklist

April 8, 2019 updated by: The Cleveland Clinic

The Effects of Implementing an Anesthesia Information Management System Guided Intraoperative Anesthesia Care Transition Checklist on Postoperative Complications: A Randomized Trial

Perioperative management decisions must often be made quickly and rely on practitioners having relevant facts at hand. During transitions of patient care between anesthesia providers, known as "handovers," information may not be completely or faithfully communicated, consequently impairing the provider's ability to intervene correctly in response to subsequent events. Checklists have consistently proven to be effective at enhancing communications during handovers, but whether anesthesia checklists improve patient outcomes has yet to be proven. The investigators propose to randomize intraoperative anesthesia provider handovers to standard practice (no specific format) or to a handover checklist presented by a decision-support system in conjunction with the investigators electronic record. Specifically, the investigators will test the hypothesis that incorporating a largely pre-populated handover checklist into transitions of intraoperative anesthesia care decreases a composite of mortality and serious cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, urinary, and infectious complications.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The modern team-based approached to patient care often involves transitioning care between providers. Critical details may be lost during transition, or handovers, resulting in delays, inefficiencies, suboptimal care, or even patient harm. The Joint Commission on Hospital Accreditation declared that communication failures are the root cause of almost two-thirds of all sentinel events. The World Health Organization similarly listed "communication during patient care handover" as one of the highest patient safety initiatives. The consequence of ineffectual communication may be especially detrimental during surgery when patients are often unstable and post-handover decisions must be made quickly and accurately. In a preliminary study the investigators observed an 8% increase in odds of experiencing major in-hospital morbidity or mortality per for each intraoperative handover.

Checklists have been used for transitions of care in a variety of areas; orthopedic trauma, urological robotic surgeries, and emergency departments. The field of anesthesia has also embraced the use of checklists, especially in the handover to intensive care units. Post-anesthesia checklists have been the particular focus of anesthesia providers in recent years. Post-operative checklists clearly enhance information transfer, but have only been evaluated using historical controls which do not account for bias. The anesthesia area most lacking valid studies is intraoperative handovers.

Anesthesia-specific intraoperative handovers differ because the interaction is primarily between anesthesia providers while surgery continues without disruption. To date, there has only been one proposed checklist for intraoperative handovers between anesthesia providers and it has not been prospectively evaluated. A randomized study with contemporaneous controls, utilizing an anesthesia specific, electronically pre-populated checklist measuring objective "hard" outcomes will address the limitations of previous studies.

The investigators propose to test the hypothesis that incorporating an electronic handover checklist during transitions of intraoperative anesthesia care reduces serious complications. Specifically, the investigators will quantify the effect of a handover checklist on adverse outcomes as defined by a composite of mortality and serious cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, urinary, and infectious complications.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

7348

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
        • Cleveland Clinic Foundation

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • non-cardiac surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  • under 18 years of age

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: SUPPORTIVE_CARE
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Checklist
after non-cardiac surgery, patients will have current standard-of-care anesthesia handover during anesthesia transitions in care with an additional, electronically pre-populated checklist displayed on the anesthesia record keeping system
patients having non-cardiac surgery
Active Comparator: Standard of Care
after non-cardiac surgery, patients will have current standard-of-care anesthesia handover during anesthesia transitions in care
patients having non-cardiac surgery

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
a composite of in-hospital mortality and 6 major morbidities including serious cardiac, respiratory, gastrointestinal, urinary, bleeding, and infectious complications
Time Frame: 5 days
5 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Leif Saager, M.D., The Cleveland Clinic

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 9, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 21, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

May 27, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 10, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 8, 2019

Last Verified

April 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 15-192

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postoperative Complications

Clinical Trials on Non-cardiac surgery

3
Subscribe