RCT Comparing 21 and 22 G Needle in the Diagnosis of Sarcoidosis by EBUS TBNA

January 2, 2017 updated by: Ritesh Agarwal, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research

Impact of Needle Size on the Diagnosis of Sarcoidosis by Endobronchial Ultrasound Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration: Randomized Trial Comparing 21-Gauge and 22-Gauge Needles

Randomized controlled trial to determine the efficacy of different needles sizes (22G and 21G) used in endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial needle aspiration

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Among the bronchoscopic techniques in diagnosis of sarcoidosis, transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) of lymph nodes has emerged as a particularly useful supplement to the previously known endobronchial and transbronchial biopsies. The efficacy and safety of conventional TBNA is well established. With improvements in technology, the last decade has seen the use of convex probe endobronchial ultrasonography (EBUS) to guide TBNA under direct vision. This technique is a minimally invasive alternative to mediastinoscopy, further it offers additional advantage of choosing the appropriate node for sampling on the basis of their echogenicity. Studies subsequently have demonstrated the superiority of EBUS TBNA over conventional TBNA.

Once the role of TBNA in diagnostic bronchoscopy was established, technical aspects of the procedure became the topic of research. Needle size used in TBNA is one such important factor. Apparently, larger the needle, better the tissue yield and hence improved diagnostic capability. Conventional TBNA is usually performed with a 19G needle, though varying sizes have been used in different studies (18, 21, 22, 26G). On the other hand, EBUS-TBNA is performed with a 22G needle. More recently 21G needles are being used for the same purpose. There have been conflicting reports in literature, when these two needle sizes have been compared with regards to the adequacy of the sample, accuracy of diagnosis and the rate of complications. Moreover, the above studies undertaken so far were done from centers where malignancy was the predominant diagnosis. Whether the needle size used during EBUS TBNA has any impact on diagnosing benign diseases like sarcoidosis is still not clear, hence this study was planned. The investigators hypothesize that performing EBUS-TBNA using 21G needles may enable identification of intact compact granulomas in sarcoidosis, and hence a better diagnostic yield than using a 22G needle.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

151

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Chandigarh, India, 160012
        • Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 99 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥18 years
  • Clinicoradiological suspicion of sarcoidosis where endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial needle aspiration is contemplated
  • Enlarged hilar and mediastinal lymph nodes >10 mm (any axis) on computed tomography of the chest

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hypoxemia (SpO2 <92%) on inspired fraction of oxygen 0.3
  • Treatment with systemic glucocorticoids for more than 2 weeks in the preceding three months
  • Diagnosis of sarcoidosis possible with another minimally invasive technique such as skin biopsy or peripheral lymph node biopsy
  • Failure to provide informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: 21G needle group
21 gauge endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial aspiration needle ( Vizishot, Olympus ) would be used to perform endobronchial ultrasound guided Transbronchial needle aspiration
Patients with a clinico radiologic suspicion of sarcoidosis will undergo endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial needle aspiration with 21 G needle, by random assignment
Active Comparator: 22G needle group
22 gauge endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial aspiration needle ( Vizishot, Olympus ) would be used to perform endobronchial ultrasound guided Transbronchial needle aspiration
Patients with a clinico radiologic suspicion of sarcoidosis will undergo endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial needle aspiration with 22 G needle, by random assignment

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The diagnostic yield of EBUS TBNA with 21G and 22G needle in patients with a final diagnosis of sarcoidosis will be assessed for any difference between the two
Time Frame: outcome assessed 6 months following enrollment of the last patient
outcome assessed 6 months following enrollment of the last patient

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adequacy of samples
Time Frame: 0, 7, 180 days of inclusion
Samples will be considered adequate if the cytologic assessment shows lymphocytes and or definite if the specimen shows epithelioid cell granulomas or collection of epithelioid cells with a giant cell (or asteroid body or Schaumann body). The samples will be classified as: diagnostic, adequate but non-diagnostic, non-diagnostic and not adequate, no specimen
0, 7, 180 days of inclusion
Complications
Time Frame: 0, 7 , 180 days of inclusion
Complications encountered with both needle sizes will be compared if there is any difference in the rate of complications
0, 7 , 180 days of inclusion

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ritesh Agarwal, DM, Additional Professor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 26, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 28, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

June 2, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 4, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 2, 2017

Last Verified

January 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PGIMERpulmoIndia

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sarcoidosis

Clinical Trials on 21 G needle group

Subscribe