A Non-inferiority Trial on Pain Relief During Oocyte Retrieval

February 11, 2019 updated by: lydia lai, Kwong Wah Hospital

A Prospective, Non-inferiority Randomized Double-blinded Trial Comparing Fentanyl and Midazolam vs Diazepam and Pethidine for Pain Relief During Oocyte Retrieval

The objective of the trial is to compare fentanyl and midazolam vs diazepam and pethidine in terms of the pain levels and post-operative side effects of TUGOR

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In-vitro fertilization / embryo transfer (IVF / ET) is a well-established method to treat various causes of infertility. It involves multiple follicular development, retrieval of oocytes and embryo transfer after fertilization. Egg retrieval at the majority of IVF units is performed through the transvaginal route under ultrasound guidance (TUGOR) [1]. During TUGOR, the needle has to pass through the mucosa in the vaginal vault in order to puncture the follicles in the ovary. The procedures are generally short, lasting about 20-30 minutes but are still painful without anaesthesia or analgesia.

Intravenous sedation with or without local anaesthesia is the most widely used method. Conscious sedation is a safe and cost-effective method of providing analgesia and anesthesia for TUGOR. [2] It is easy to administer in cooperative and motivated patients. It has a relatively low risk for adverse effects on oocyte and embryo quality and pregnancy rates. [3] Paracervical block (PCB) in conjunction with conscious sedation during TUGOR was shown to significantly reduce the pain during TUGOR when compared to PCB alone [4].

A Cochrane review on various methods of sedation and analgesia for pain relief during TUGOR has shown no single method or delivery system appeared superior for pregnancy rates and pain relief. [5] Most of the methods seemed to work well and the effect was usually enhanced by addition of another method such as pain relief with paracervical block. [6]

The investigators' reproductive centre has recently aligned with the Assisted Reproduction Centre of the University of Hong Kong (HKU). The investigators are using 0.1mg fentanyl and 5mg midazolam intravenously for pain relief in TUGOR at Kwong Wah Hospital (KWH) whereas 5mg diazepam and 25mg pethidine intravenously are being used in HKU. The investigators would like to compare fentanyl and midazolam vs diazepam and pethidine in terms of pain levels and post-operative side effects of TUGOR in this prospective non-inferiority randomized double-blinded trial. The investigators postulate there are no differences in the pain levels between two groups but the postoperative side effects may be different.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

170

Phase

  • Phase 4

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 40 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • presence of both ovaries;
  • body mass index less than 30
  • written informed consent and
  • Chinese

Exclusion Criteria:

  • IVF cycle converted from ovulation induction or intrauterine insemination cycles;
  • patient requests general anaesthesia for TUGOR;
  • history of drug sensitivity to lignocaine/fentanyl/midazolam/diazepam/pethidine;
  • less than 3 dominant follicles present;
  • dominant follicles present in one ovary only and
  • TUGOR performed on one side only.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: A: intravenous fentanyl, midazolam
group A will be given intravenous 0.1mg fentanyl and 5mg midazolam prior oocyte retrieval
arm A receiving iv fentanyl
arm A receiving iv midazolam
Other Names:
  • dormicum
Placebo Comparator: B: intravenous pethidine, diazepam
group B will be given intravenous 25mg pethidine, 5mg diazepam prior oocyte retrieval
arm B receiving iv pethidine
arm B receiving iv diazepam
Other Names:
  • valium

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Level During Oocyte Retrieval
Time Frame: will be assessed within 4 hours of oocyte retrieval
The pain level will be scored using visual analogue scale 0-10, 0 = no pain, 10 =most painful
will be assessed within 4 hours of oocyte retrieval
Pain Level After Oocyte Retrieval
Time Frame: will be assessed within 4 hours of oocyte retrieval
The pain level will be scored using visual analogue scale 0-10, 0 = no pain, 10 =most painful
will be assessed within 4 hours of oocyte retrieval

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Side Effects by Type
Time Frame: will be assessed within 4 hours of oocyte retrieval
side effects will be scored by yes or no
will be assessed within 4 hours of oocyte retrieval
Patient's Satisfaction on Oocyte Retrieval
Time Frame: will be assessed within 4 hours of oocyte retrieval
satisfaction will be scored from 0-3 (0=excellent, 1=satisfactory, 2=fair, 3=unsatisfactory)
will be assessed within 4 hours of oocyte retrieval
Clinical Pregnancy Rate
Time Frame: will be assessed within ten weeks of oocyte retrieval
presence of intrauterine sac in ultrasound after a positive pregnancy test
will be assessed within ten weeks of oocyte retrieval
Ongoing Pregnancy Rate
Time Frame: will be assessed within ten weeks of oocyte retrieval
positive fetal heart pulsation seen in ultrasound at eight weeks of gestation
will be assessed within ten weeks of oocyte retrieval
Patient's Satisfaction on Pain Relief
Time Frame: within 4 hours after retrieval
satisfaction on pain relief will be scored at 0-10 (10 being most satisfied)
within 4 hours after retrieval
Sedation Level
Time Frame: immediately after retrieval
S = sleeping, easily aroused; 1 = awake and alert; 2 = occasionally drowsy, easy to arouse; 3 = frequently drowsy, arousable, drifts off to sleep during conversation; 4 = somnolent, minimal or no response to stimuli
immediately after retrieval

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Shui Fan Lai, Kwong Wah Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 17, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 7, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

July 10, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 5, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 11, 2019

Last Verified

February 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Infertility

Clinical Trials on fentanyl

3
Subscribe