Automated Pupillometry for Coma Prognostication After Cardiac Arrest

September 8, 2021 updated by: Mauro ODDO, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois

Background: Sedation and therapeutic hypothermia (TH) delay neurological responses and might reduce the accuracy of clinical examination to predict outcome after cardiac arrest (CA). Electroencephalography (EEG) and somato-sensory evoked potentials (SSEP) might significantly improve prognostication of post-CA coma, however, EEG and SSEP are not always available and require specific expertise for their interpretation. Automated video pupillometry is a novel electronic device that contains an infrared light camera which enables to measure quantitatively the percentage of pupillary reaction to a calibrated light stimulation. In a recent study of a cohort of comatose CA survivors (n=50 patients) it was found that quantitative PLR was more accurate than standard PLR (manual pen light) in predicting 3-month outcome, irrespective of temperature and sedation, and had comparable prognostic accuracy than electrophysiological exams, including electroencephalography (EEG) and somato-sensory evoked potentials (SSEP).

Aim of the study: In light of these promising results, the investigators would like to confirm the prognostic value of quantitative PLR in a large multicenter cohort of comatose post-CA patients.

Design of the study: Prospective, multicenter, observational outcome trial.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Study: Prospective, multicenter study. The study will be double-blinded, i.e. the clinician/nurse performing the tests will not be involved in patient care and clinicians in charge of patients will not be aware of automated pupillometry data. Patient care will not be influenced by pupillometry.

Patient population:

The investigators plan to include 500 comatose post-CA patients. The centers have been selected based on their expertise and publication track record on the topic, and because they are actively involved in the Neurointensive Care section (NIC) of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM). The study will take place at the Department of Intensive Care of the participating centers.

Patients will be managed according to standards of post-resuscitation care and based on local algorithms for the treatment of post-CA coma.

Quantitative pupillary light reactivity (PLR, using the NeurOptics NPi-200 pupillometer) will be performed on ICU admission and then every 12 hours up to 72 hours after CA. At each time point, one measurement will be assessed on both eyes.

The primary variables for analysis will be the neurological pupil index (NPi) and the pupil size for both eyes. Standard PLR using a manual pen light will be performed simultaneously at each time point, as part of standard care.

EEG, SSEP and sampling for serum neuron specific enolase (NSE) will be performed at 24h and at 48-72h, according to local practices and as part of standard care.

The predictive value of NPi will be analyzed using the area under the receiving operator characteristics (ROC) curve, and compared to that of standard PLR, EEG, SSEP and NSE: sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), unweighted accuracy, with 95% binomial confidence intervals, will be calculated. Associations with outcome will adjusted for main baseline demographics (age, initial CA arrest rhythm, time from CA to tROSC), dose of sedation-analgesia and vaso-active agents, and the SOFA score, using a logistic regression model.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

470

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Brussels, Belgium
        • Erasme University Hospital
      • Grenoble, France
        • University Hospital, Grenoble
      • Paris, France
        • Cochin Hospital
      • Berlin, Germany
        • Charite University, Berlin, Germany
      • Monza, Italy
        • Azienda Ospedaliera San Gerardo di Monza
      • Roma, Italy
        • Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
      • Luxembourg, Luxembourg
        • Centre Hospitalier du Luxembourg
      • Amsterdam, Netherlands
        • Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
      • Lund, Sweden
        • Lund University Hospital
      • Lausanne, Switzerland
        • CHUV, Lausanne University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with coma after cardiac arrest (CA)

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients with coma after cardiac arrest (CA)
  • Glasgow Coma Scale (at inclusion): ≤ 6
  • Patients with CA due to ventricular fibrillation (VF) and non-VF (including asystole and pulseless electrical activity) rhythms
  • Cardiac and non-cardiac causes of CA will be included

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age < 18 years
  • Unable to obtain consent
  • Follow-up unavailable

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Neurological outcome
Time Frame: 3-6 months
Neurological outcome is assessed by a semi-structured telephone interview with the patient or the patient's relatives using the Glasgow-Pittsburgh Cerebral Performance Categories (CPC). The CPC result is then categorized as favorable outcome (CPC 1-2, including good recovery and moderate disability), vs. unfavorable outcome (CPC 3-5, including severe disability, vegetative state and death).
3-6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2015

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

March 1, 2017

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

July 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 2, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 16, 2015

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

November 18, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

September 16, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 8, 2021

Last Verified

September 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cardiac Arrest

3
Subscribe