Robot-assisted Procedure Versus Open Simultaneous Resection of Colorectal Cancer With Liver Metastases

March 27, 2019 updated by: Xu jianmin

The Safety and Effect of Robot-assisted Procedure Versus Open Simultaneous Resection of Colorectal Cancer: Randomized Control Trial Study

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted simultaneous resection in selected patients with sigmoid colon cancer or rectal cancer liver metastases, and compared with the traditional open procedure.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The Da Vinci Surgical System may help to overcome some of the difficulties of laparoscopy for complicated abdominal surgery. The aim of this study was to present an innovative technique that is robot-assisted, simultaneous radical resection of both colorectal cancer and liver metastasis (RSRCLM).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

160

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Shanghai, China, 200032
        • Recruiting
        • Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ≥ 18 and ≤ 75 years;
  2. Primary tumor has undergone histologically confirmed colon adenocarcinoma; Colon cancer was defined by the presence of the inferior pole of the tumor above the peritoneal reflection (at least 15 cm from the anal margin).
  3. Together with clinical or radiological evidence of Stage II (T3-4, N0, M0) or Stage III (T1-4, N1-2, M0) disease (according to the 2010 revision of the International Union Against Cancer primary tumor, regional nodes, metastasis (TNM) staging system);Liver metastasis was diagnosis by multidisciplinary (MDT) team base on liver Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Positron Emission Computed Tomography (PET-CT).
  4. Performance status (ECOG) 0~1
  5. Adequate hematological function: Neutrophils≥1.5 x109/l and platelet count≥100 x109/l; hemoglobin (Hb) ≥9g/dl (within 1 week prior to randomization)
  6. Adequate hepatic and renal function: Serum bilirubin≤1.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN), alkaline phosphatase ≤5x ULN, and serum transaminase (either primary tumor, regional nodes, metastasis (AST) or ALT) ≤ 5 x ULN(within 1 week prior to randomization);
  7. Written informed consent for participation in the trial.
  8. The liver resectability was evaluated by liver surgery of MDT team, indication including: tumor number ≤ 3; the Maximum diameter of one tumor ≤ 10 cm.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Body mass index (BMI) more than 30 kg/m2.
  2. Serious pre-operative comorbidity, including cardiovascular disease (coronary arteriosclerosis, arrhythmia, heart failure), pulmonary dysfunction (lung emphysema, obstructive lung disease), liver insufficiency (Child-Pugh B or C), renal insufficiency (serum creatinine >2.0 mg/dl), and arterial circulation disturbance (occlusion of arterial vessels of limb in patient's history.
  3. History of accepting abdominal surgery.
  4. Liver tumor located at I or invasive the middle hepatic vein.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: RSRCLM
robot-assisted, simultaneous radical resection of both colorectal cancer and liver metastasis (RSRCLM).Three different liver resection procedures were chose to personalized patients. Generally, when the size of liver metastasis was ≤ 3 cm, a wedge resection was chose without Hilar vessels blocking. The segmentectomy was performed using the Glissonian approach when tumor size was among 3-5 cm, and Hilar vessels was blocked, if necessary. For resection of Couinaud's segments II and III, left lateral sectionectomy (LLS) was performed commonly. Intraoperative ultrasound can help us find intrahepatic pedicles and follow the proper resection line. When liver tumor size was more than 5 cm or more than 3 tumors with the size over 3cm, hemicolectomy was applied usually.
The Da Vinci Surgical System may help to overcome some of the difficulties of laparoscopy for complicated abdominal surgery. The aim of this study was to present an innovative technique that is robot-assisted, simultaneous radical resection of both colorectal cancer and liver metastasis (RSRCLM).
Active Comparator: Open
Traditional open simultaneous radical resection of both colorectal cancer and liver metastasis. The DFS and safety event were evaluated.
Traditional open simultaneous radical resection of both colorectal cancer and liver metastasis

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Surgical Complication
Time Frame: 30 days after surgury
According to Clavein-Dindo complication system to calculate the complication events during 30 day after surgery
30 days after surgury

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Operative mortality
Time Frame: 30 days post operatively
death occurred 30 days after operation
30 days post operatively
Disease-free survival(DFS)
Time Frame: 3 years disease-free survival
DFS was defined as from the date of randomization to the date of tumor
3 years disease-free survival
overall survival (OS)
Time Frame: OS rate at 3 and 5 years after operation
overall survival was defined as from the date of randomization to the date of Death ;
OS rate at 3 and 5 years after operation
locoregional recurrence rate
Time Frame: 3 and 5 years
local recurrence rate at 3 and 5 years after operation
3 and 5 years

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
self reported bladder function
Time Frame: at postoperative 3, 6 and 1 2 months
This section is assessed using a self-rating scale "International prostate symptom score" (IPSS)
at postoperative 3, 6 and 1 2 months
self reported sexual function for male patients
Time Frame: at postoperative 3, 6 and 1 2 month
This section is assessed using a self-rating scale "International Index of Erectile Function" (IIEF-5).
at postoperative 3, 6 and 1 2 month
self reported sexual function for female patients
Time Frame: at postoperative 3, 6 and 1 2 months
This section is assessed using a self-rating scale "Female Sexual Function Index" (FSFI).
at postoperative 3, 6 and 1 2 months
liver function
Time Frame: at Day 1,3,5 after surgery
Serum aminotransferase will be tested in the laboratory
at Day 1,3,5 after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: wenju chang, MD, Fudan University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

April 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 8, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 28, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

December 30, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 29, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 27, 2019

Last Verified

March 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Colorectal Liver Metastasis

3
Subscribe