A Randomized, Controlled, Double-blind Clinical Trial of Surinam Cherry Dentifrice With Anti-gingivitis Properties

January 5, 2016 updated by: Irlan de Almeida Freires, Federal University of Paraíba

A Randomized, Controlled, Double-blind Clinical Trial of a Eugenia Uniflora Linn. (Surinam Cherry) Dentifrice With Anti-gingivitis Properties

In the present randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial, we investigated the short term clinical efficacy of a dentifrice containing Eugenia uniflora L. ripe fruit extract in preventing gingivitis in children.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This was a randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial investigating the short term clinical efficacy of a dentifrice containing Eugenia uniflora L. ripe fruit extract in preventing gingivitis in children. The study consisted of a sample of 50 male and female subjects between the ages of 10 and 12 years old, who had clinical signs of gingivitis. The subjects were randomly assigned to one of two groups. The intervention group comprised 25 subjects who used the dentifrice with E. uniflora L. ripe fruit hydroalcoholic extract, three times per day, for seven consecutive days. The control group comprised 25 subjects who used the control dentifrice (fluoride, 1500 ppm and triclosan, 0.3%) for seven consecutive days.

The sample size was estimated using Fleming's single-stage procedure for phase II trials. With regard to the primary outcome, a response proportion of at least 50% was defined as being clinically significant. The type I error was set as 0.05, and the type II error was set at 0.1. Based on these values, a sample size of 20 individuals per trial arm would provide 90% power (1-β) to detect any clinically relevant treatment difference of 50% or greater compared to baseline. Taking into consideration an attrition rate of approximately 20%, the final sample size per trial arm comprised 25 individuals.

Clinical examinations were performed at baseline and after seven days of dentifrice use. The examination was performed by a single examiner who was adequately calibrated with a Kappa statistic of 0.8, which is considered to be satisfactory agreement according to Landis & Koch. The examination data were recorded in a specific clinical chart. The diagnosis of gingivitis (primary outcome) was assessed using the Gingival Bleeding Index (GBI) proposed by Ainamo and Bay. The accumulation of biofilm (secondary outcome) was assessed with the Simplified Oral Hygiene Index (OHI-S) described by Greene and Vermilion. Prior to the study, all of the subjects were instructed on correct tooth brushing techniques and received a kit that contained a toothbrush and one of the dentifrices (without the identification of its contents). The dentifrices were also masked with regard to flavor and color so that they could not be identified. In addition, the examiner had no knowledge of the subject allocation. Thus, the study was double-blind.

The sample included only subjects who had not used an antimicrobial in the last two months, including topical fluoride.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

10 years to 12 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Children aged 10 to 12 years old with clinical signs of gingivitis (bleeding on probing);
  • Presence of at least 20 dental elements
  • Not using orthodontic fixed appliances
  • Susceptibility to form biofilm and gingival inflammation
  • Absence of systemic disease

Exclusion Criteria:

- Subjects who had used an antimicrobial in the last two months, including topical fluoride.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental dentifrice
Dentifrice containing the extract of Eugenia uniflora rip fruit. Each 10 ml of E. uniflora L. dentifrice comprises the following components: Hydroalcoholic extract of the ripe fruit of E. uniflora L. (3.0%), preservatives (parabens; 0.02 g), and dentifrice base (silicon dioxide, sodium lauryl sulfate, white dye, aromatic compounds, sodium saccharin, and Gangrez sodium salt; q.s.p.). Intervention protocol: three times per day (pea-like amount), for seven consecutive days.
3x/day for 7 days.
Other Names:
  • Surrinam cherry dentifrice, Colgate total 12
Active Comparator: Control Dentifrice

Control dentifrice - Colgate total 12 (fluoride, 1500 ppm and triclosan, 0.3%)

Intervention protocol: three times per day (pea-like amount), for seven consecutive days.

3x/day for 7 days.
Other Names:
  • Surrinam cherry dentifrice, Colgate total 12

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Reduction in gingivitis levels
Time Frame: Baseline and seven days
The primary outcome of interest was the reduction in the levels of gingivitis (bleeding on probing) assessed by the Gingival Bleeding Index (GBI) proposed by Ainamo and Bay.
Baseline and seven days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Reduction in the amount of plaque
Time Frame: Baseline and seven days
The secondary outcome of interest was the reduction in the amount of plaque assessed by the Simplified Oral Hygiene Index (OHI-S) described by Greene and Vermilion.
Baseline and seven days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ricardo D Castro, PhD, Federal University of Paraiba

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 5, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 5, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

January 6, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 6, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 5, 2016

Last Verified

January 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Eugenia Dentifrice

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gingivitis

Clinical Trials on Dentifrice

3
Subscribe