Comparison of Two Modes of Administration of the IADL Questionnaire, Assessing the Level of Functional Autonomy of Patients to Carry Out the Tasks of Daily Living: Randomized Controlled Trial Among Patients of a Memory Clinic (IADL)

May 19, 2016 updated by: Hospices Civils de Lyon

Comparison of Two Modes of Administration of the IADL Questionnaire

In France, about 1 million people 65 and older are diagnosed with dementia syndrome characterized by cognitive decline and impairment of functional capacity. The assessment of the level of functional autonomy is therefore an essential step in monitoring patients in Memory Clinic and can be estimated by the Lawton IADL questionnaire, assessing the patients' ability to perform daily tasks.

In the Memory Clinic, the first estimate of the level of patient autonomy is achieved during a face-to-face interview between their primary caregiver and a nurse, using the IADL questionnaire. This assessment should be renewed every year. The IADL questionnaire is part of the information that the memories consultations shall transmit to the Alzheimer's National Bank (BNA).

However, current practice has shown that the systematic collection is problematic in the organization of Memory Clinic. It is thus expected to collect this questionnaire by phone in order to measure changes in the level of autonomy during the disease, and improve the completeness of this collection. A study is conducted with the main objective to measure the reliability of the assessment of IADL questionnaires conducted during a telephone interview with the caregiver of the patient, in comparison to the reference mode: the face-to-face interview with the caregiver.

Materials and methods The experimental design of the study will be a randomized crossover trial (crossover), including 394 patients divided into two branches. In the first part, the collection of the IADL questionnaire will be performed according to the reference method in the consultation (face-to-face interview with the nurse), the measurement will be repeated at 1 month intervals by phone. In the second part the sequence of execution modes will be reversed. The reliability of the measurement of the level of autonomy will be studied by comparing repeated measurements based on handover modes. The correspondence between the repeated measures will also be considered in terms of patient characteristics. The feasibility of administration of the questionnaire by phone mode will be evaluated.

Expected results The mode of administration by phone should allow to obtain a reliable measurement of the level of patient autonomy when the administration is carried out in a standardized way. The study should also identify patients and situations for which this method of administration by phone may be appropriate.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

299

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Villeurbanne, France, 69100
        • Hospices Civils de Lyon - Hôpital Charpennes - Memory Research Centre Lyon, Clinical Research Centre (CVF)

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients received for the first time at the Memory Clinic,
  • Patients living at home
  • Patients accompanied by a caregiver,
  • Patients and caregivers agreeing to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients whose caregivers did not wish to participate in the study,
  • Patients living in institutions or nursing homes,
  • Patients whose caregivers did not have or did not provide a telephone contact,
  • Patients for who the health status would require institutionalization during the period of the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Face-to-face collection followed by collection by phone
Reference procedure i.e IADL collected during a face-to-face interview at the Memory Clinic, followed by the collection of IADL by phone, one month later.
The administration of IADL questionnaire by phone consists of a collection of answers given by the caregiver during the interview with the research nurse, trained for this procedure. This method of procurement will be standardized with a listing support for the phone interview to obtain the same conditions for collection of data from a caregiver to another. Questions will be asked in the same order than the questionnaire collected with the reference procedure i.e. face-to-face interview at the Memory Clinic. The IADL questionnaires in paper format used during the ace-to-face interview and by phone will be identical.
Experimental: Collection by phone followed by face-to-face collection
Collection of IADL by phone, followed by the collection of the IADL questionnaire using the reference procedure i.e IADL collected during a face-to-face interview at the Memory Clinic, one month later.
The administration of IADL questionnaire by phone consists of a collection of answers given by the caregiver during the interview with the research nurse, trained for this procedure. This method of procurement will be standardized with a listing support for the phone interview to obtain the same conditions for collection of data from a caregiver to another. Questions will be asked in the same order than the questionnaire collected with the reference procedure i.e. face-to-face interview at the Memory Clinic. The IADL questionnaires in paper format used during the ace-to-face interview and by phone will be identical.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Degree of agreement (concordance) of the overall level of functional autonomy measured with two ways (face-to-face interview and by phone)
Time Frame: 1 month

The degree of agreement (concordance) of the overall level of autonomy will be measured between the two modes administration of the IADL questionnaire.

The level of independence (or dependence) will be evaluated from the scale of instrumental activities of daily living (IADL Lawton). From 8 issues, it allows to study the ability of the person to perform common activities: Ability to use the phone to go shopping, preparing food, do its housekeeping, to its activities bleaching, to use the means of transport, to ensure accountability in respect of salary and handle money.

1 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Consistency of the answers to each question of the IADL questionnaires between the two methods of administration
Time Frame: 1 month

To assess the reliability of the collection of the questionnaire by phone (agreement answers to each question on the IADL), the secondary endpoint will be considered:

- The consistency of the answers to each question of the IADL questionnaires between the two methods of administration: during the face-to-face interview, and by phone.

1 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 11, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 12, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

January 13, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 20, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 19, 2016

Last Verified

May 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Alzheimer's Disease

Clinical Trials on IADL administration by phone

3
Subscribe