Long-term Efficacy and Safety of Gabapentin Enacarbil in Japanese Restless Legs Syndrome Patients

February 3, 2016 updated by: Astellas Pharma Inc

Long-term Study - Long-term Efficacy and Safety of Gabapentin Enacarbil in Japanese Restless Legs Syndrome Patients

The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ASP8825 (gabapentin enacarbil) for long-term treatment of restless legs syndrome patients.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

182

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Chiba, Japan
      • Fukuoka, Japan
      • Hokkaido, Japan
      • Hyogo, Japan
      • Kanagawa, Japan
      • Kyoto, Japan
      • Miyagi, Japan
      • Osaka, Japan
      • Saitama, Japan
      • Tokyo, Japan

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who diagnosed with RLS according to the diagnostic criteria established by the International RLS Study Group
  • International Restless Legs Syndrome Scale (IRLS) score ≥15 presence of RLS symptoms on ≥15 days per month and ≥4 days per week preceding inclusion in this study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients using dopamine agonists or gabapentin within 1 week before or any anti-RLS treatment within 2 weeks before the start of the pretreatment observation period
  • Patients with an estimated creatinine clearance <60 mL/min determined using the Cockcroft-Gault formula
  • Pregnant or lactating women
  • Individuals with serum ferritin <20 ng/mL were also excluded from the trial
  • Individuals with movement disorders and/or abnormal neurological findings

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: ASP8825 group
Oral
Other Names:
  • gabapentin enacarbil

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline in IRLS score
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52
IRLS: International Restless Legs Syndrome Scale
Baseline to Week 52
Safety assessed by Vital signs
Time Frame: Up to Week 52
Blood pressure and pulse rate
Up to Week 52
Safety assessed by Adverse Events
Time Frame: Up to Week 52
Up to Week 52
Safety assessed by Laboratory tests
Time Frame: Up to Week 52
Hematology, blood biochemistry, thyroid function test and urinalysis
Up to Week 52
Safety assessed by 12-lead-electrocardiogram
Time Frame: Up to Week 52
Up to Week 52

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of responders on ICGl of improvement
Time Frame: Up to Week 52
ICGI: Investigator-rated Clinical Global Impression of improvement
Up to Week 52
Proportion of responders on PCGI of improvement
Time Frame: Up to Week 52
PCGI: Patient-rated Clinical Global Impression
Up to Week 52
Change from baseline in PSQI
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52
PSQI: Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
Baseline to Week 52
Change from baseline in SF-36v2
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52
SF-36v2: Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey version 2
Baseline to Week 52
Change from baseline in RLS-QOL
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52
RLS-QOL: Restless Legs Syndrome Quality of Life Questionnaire
Baseline to Week 52
Change from baseline in MOS sleep scale
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 52
MOS: Medical outcomes study
Baseline to Week 52
Plasma concentration of gabapentin
Time Frame: Week 12, 28 and 52
Week 12, 28 and 52

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 13, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 14, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

January 18, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 4, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 3, 2016

Last Verified

February 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Restless Legs Syndrome

Clinical Trials on ASP8825

3
Subscribe