Cognitive Training in the Treatment of AUD

July 18, 2022 updated by: VA Office of Research and Development

Cognitive Training in the Treatment of Alcohol Use Disorders in Older Veterans

Alcohol Use Disorders (AUDs) have a significant public health impact and are highly prevalent in Veterans. Alcohol related brain effects on neurocognition (attention, memory and executive function) reduce ability to benefit from current treatments. These cognitive impairments are especially common in the early phase of recovery, persist over years and get worse with age. Recent research suggests that cognitive remediation therapy (CRT) may improve attention, memory and executive function in other disorders, and the investigators just completed pilot study with AUD Veterans found significantly greater improvements for those receiving CRT. The proposed study examines AUD outcomes and neurocognitive improvements when CRT is combined with a standardized alcohol treatment. The investigators hypothesize that CRT will improve neurocognition and AUD outcomes more than standardized alcohol treatment alone. Findings will determine whether CRT augmentation can benefit Veterans with AUDs.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study aims to determine whether a combined intervention of cognitive remediation therapy (CRT) and Individual Drug Counseling (IDC) can benefit older Veterans in the initial phase of alcohol abuse treatment by improving abstinence outcomes and neurocognition. Substantial cognitive impairment is associated with alcohol use disorders (AUD), and becomes worse with years of use and the aging processes. In particular, Veterans entering treatment for AUD display cognitive deficits that may reduce their ability to benefit from treatment. While there is considerable variety in the severity and types of cognitive impairment found in newly recovering patients, problems with attention, learning and memory and executive function are common. Since treatment requires that the individual be able to sustain attention, remember what is learned, and apply it to recovery, impaired underlying cognitive processes make successful treatment less likely. Moreover, problems with executive functioning and other pre-frontal cognitive processes have been associated with decreased treatment retention and poorer AUD treatment outcomes. Although cognition can improve with sustained abstinence, it is during the early phase of recovery, when cognition is most impaired, that patients receive the most intensive treatment. AUD is a major cause of suffering and functional disability for older Veterans and a common co-morbidity with other physical and mental disorders. Finding more effective treatments of AUD remains a priority for VA healthcare.

The purpose of the proposed study is to learn whether CRT plus IDC, an evidence-based outpatient AUD treatment is more effective than a Game-Play Placebo plus IDC. Game-Play Placebo has been used to provide equipoise between conditions in other CRT studies and in a current CRT study with mTBI Veterans funded by DoD being conducted by the PI. The current study is a randomized controlled trial (RCT) with a target enrollment of 90 Veterans in the initial phase of AUD treatment. The study is sufficiently powered to allow us to fulfill the following aims and test their related hypotheses:

Specific Primary Aim # 1: To determine if CRT+IDC is more effective than Game-Play Placebo +IDC in decreasing alcohol use in older Veterans during the 3 month active intervention period.

Ho1: CRT+IDC will be more effective than Game-Play Placebo+IDC in reducing heavy drinking days and decreasing days of use as measured by Breathalyzer and Timeline Follow-back Method (TLFB) during the 90 days of active intervention.

Secondary Aim #1: To determine if CRT+IDC is more effective than Game-Play Placebo+ IDC in sustaining decreased alcohol use in older Veterans at the end of 6 months (3 months after the active intervention period).

Ho2: CRT+IDC will be more effective than Game-Play Placebo+IDC in reducing heavy drinking days and decreasing days of use as measured by Breathalyzer and Timeline Follow-back Method (TLFB) for the 30 days preceding 6 month follow-up.

Secondary Aim #2: To determine if the combination of CRT and IDC is more effective than game play placebo and IDC in improving neurocognitive functioning.

Ho3: Veterans receiving CRT+IDC will show greater improvement than Veterans receiving Game-Play Placebo+IDC at 3 month follow-up on a global index of neurocognitive function, and on an index of working memory and an index of executive function.

Ho4: Differential improvements in neurocognitive function will be sustained at 6 month follow-up.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

62

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Connecticut
      • West Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06516
        • VA Connecticut Healthcare System West Haven Campus, West Haven, CT

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Veterans enrolled in VA AUD treatment as usual and Non-Veteran community members in AUD treatment
  • Have a primary diagnosis of AUD and are within 30 days of detoxification or last use at time of recruitment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Other medical illnesses that compromise neurocognition
  • Active use of prescribed opioids or benzodiazepines that may hinder new learning
  • Commitment to complete active phase and attend follow-up
  • No pending incarceration or plans to leave the state

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: CRT+IDC
Cognitive Remediation Therapy for 13 weeks plus Individual Drug Counseling
Up to 65 hours of computer based cognitive training of attention, verbal and visual memory, verbal and visual working memory, and executive functions
Active Comparator: Computer Game Play+IDC
Computer arcade games for 13 weeks plus Individual Drug Counseling
Up to 65 hours of computer based cognitive training of attention, verbal and visual memory, verbal and visual working memory, and executive functions

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Alcohol and other drug use assessed by weekly Time Line Follow-back and breathalyzer
Time Frame: 3 months of active treatment
Heavy Drinking Days and Days of use over 90 days
3 months of active treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Alcohol and other drug use assessed by weekly Time Line Follow-back and breathalyzer
Time Frame: 30 days preceding 6 month follow-up, 3 months after active treatment.
Heavy Drinking Days and Days of use over 30 days
30 days preceding 6 month follow-up, 3 months after active treatment.
Penn Alcohol Craving Scale
Time Frame: 3 months of active treatment and 6 month follow-up
Changes in self-ratings of alcohol craving from baseline.
3 months of active treatment and 6 month follow-up
Neurocognitive assessments using neurocognitive tests of attention, processing speed, executive function and memory
Time Frame: 7 weeks, 3 month and 6 months
Changes from baseline on neurocognitive domains of attention, processing speed, executive function, working memory and learning and memory.
7 weeks, 3 month and 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Morris D. Bell, PhD, VA Connecticut Healthcare System West Haven Campus, West Haven, CT

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 22, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 14, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 21, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

January 26, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 21, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 18, 2022

Last Verified

July 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Alcohol Use Disorder Cognitive Decline

Clinical Trials on Cognitive Remediation Training

3
Subscribe