Internet-based Versus Face-to-face Clinical Care for Tinnitus

June 24, 2021 updated by: Anglia Ruskin University

Internet-based Versus Face-to-face Clinical Care for Tinnitus: A Multi-study Randomised Control Trial

The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of a CBT-based internet intervention with face to face standard clinical care for adults with tinnitus in the United Kingdom.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Objectives Tinnitus is one of the most distressing disabilities and innovative ways of managing the related health care burden is required. A cognitive behavioural therapy (CTB) based internet intervention (iCBT) has been developed to improve access to tinnitus treatments. This study aims to determine the feasibility and effectiveness of iCBT in reducing the impact associated with tinnitus in the United Kingdom (UK) compared to standard face-to-face clinical care.

Design A two-armed Randomized Control Trial (RCT), will be used to evaluate the effectiveness iCBT on tinnitus distress. Participants placed in the experimental group will receive iCBT and those in the control group will undergo standard face-to-face hospital based clinical care.

Setting: This will be an multi-center study, recruiting from three tinnitus clinics in the East of England, UK; namely: Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital Trust, Milton Keynes University Hospital and Hinchingbrooke Healthcare NHS Trust

Participants: Recruitment will be undertaken from 3 separate clinical settings. Adult patients seen by ENT Consultants or Audiologist at these centers who mention being significantly bothered by tinnitus, and who would normally be referred for tinnitus services will be considered for the study. 80 Participants will be recruited and will be randomly assigned to either receiving face-to-face clinical clinical care consisting or or internet-based intervention (iCBT).

Intervention:

i) iCBT group: This group will undergo a CTB-based internet intervention, providing an opportunity to learn about new ways of coping with tinnitus during everyday life. It is 8 week long e-learning intervention, with new modules introduced weekly and assignments given to practice techniques learnt.

ii) Standard clinical care group: receive individual face-to-face tinnitus appointment providing the care deemed most important to this individual and follow-up appointments as required.

Outcome measures: The main outcome measure is the Tinnitus Functional Index. Secondary outcome measures are the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory- Screening version and self-reported measures for insomnia, hearing disability, cognitive functioning, hyperacusis, anxiety and depression and quality of life. These will be measured at baseline, 3 months post- intervention and 6-months post- intervention, to assess the intervention effects over time.

Hypothesis: If iCBT proves feasible and is effective compared to standard clinical care, it may have implications for the way tinnitus suffers are managed in the UK. It may be that a subset of tinnitus suffers can be managed though an e-learning treatment program, freeing up services for those with more severe problems that need face to face treatment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

92

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Huntingdon, United Kingdom, PE29 6NT
        • Hinchingbrooke Hospital
      • Milton Keynes, United Kingdom, MK6 5LD
        • Milton Keynes University Hospital
    • Norfolk
      • Norwich, Norfolk, United Kingdom, NR4 7UY
        • Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Attending either Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Milton Keynes University Hospital or Hinchingbrooke Hospitals as recruitment is via these hospitals
  • The ability to read and type in English
  • No barriers to using a computer (e.g. significant fine motor control or visual problems)
  • Internet and e-mail access, and the ability to use these
  • Commitment to completing the programme
  • Completion of the online screening and outcome questionnaires
  • Agreeing to participate in either group and be randomized to one of these groups
  • Understanding and working towards the end goal of reducing the impact and distress of tinnitus, although the strength of the tinnitus may remain the same

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Reporting any major medical or psychiatric conditions
  • Reporting pulsatile, objective or unilateral tinnitus, which have not been investigated medically
  • Tinnitus as a consequence of a medical disorder, still under investigation
  • Undergoing any tinnitus therapy concurrently to partaking in this study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental group: iCBT
CBT-based internet-intervention for tinnitus The intervention offered is a CTB-based internet intervention, providing an opportunity to learn about new ways of coping with tinnitus during everyday life. It is 8 week long e-learning intervention, with new modules introduced weekly and assignments given to practice techniques learnt.
Tinnitus e-learning programme
Other Names:
  • iCBT
Active Comparator: Face-to-face clinical tinnitus care
Receive individual face-to-face tinnitus care, and follow-up appointments as required.
Hospital tinnitus counselling

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Tinnitus Functional Index
Time Frame: At baseline and at 8 weeks post-intervention
A self-reported outcome measure of tinnitus severity. Units of measurement: scores on a scale Abbreviation TFI Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 100 Higher score is a worse outcome Units are scores on a scale Total score out of 100 is reported and not any subscales Scores below 25 indicate mild tinnitus, from 25-50 indicated significant tinnitus and from 50-100 severe tinnitus
At baseline and at 8 weeks post-intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cognitive Failures Questionnaire
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention
Measure of how cognitive difficulties such as concentration and memory Units of measurement: scores on a scale Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 100 Higher score is a worse outcome Units are scores on a scale Total score used, not sub scales
Assessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention
Tinnitus Handicap Inventory
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention. Both time points are reported
Measure of how severe the tinnitus is Units of measurement: scores on a scale Abbreviation THI Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 100 Higher score is a worse outcome Total score used, not sub scales
Assessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention. Both time points are reported
Satisfaction With Life Scale
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention. Both scores are reported

Quality of life measure Units of measurement: scores on a scale Minimal value: 5 Maximum value 35 Higher score is a better outcome

Total score used, not sub scales

Assessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention. Both scores are reported
Patient Health Questionnaire
Time Frame: At baseline and at 8 weeks post-intervention
Measure of signs of depressive disorders Units of measurement: scores on a scale Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 28 Higher score is a worse outcome Total score used, not sub scales
At baseline and at 8 weeks post-intervention
Generalised Anxiety Disorder
Time Frame: At baseline and at 8 weeks post-intervention. Both scores are reported
Measure of anxiety disorder and traits Units of measurement: scores on a scale Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 21 Higher score is a worse outcome Total score used, not sub scales
At baseline and at 8 weeks post-intervention. Both scores are reported
Hyperacusis Questionnaire
Time Frame: At baseline and at 8 weeks post-intervention. both scores are reported
Measure of abnormal sound sensitivity Units of measurement: scores on a scale Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 42 Hotal score used, not sub scales
At baseline and at 8 weeks post-intervention. both scores are reported
Hearing Handicap Inventory
Time Frame: At baseline and at 8 weeks post-intervention
Measure of hearing difficulties or hearing disability using a screening tool Units of measurement: scores on a scale Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 40 Higher score is a worse outcome Total score used, not sub scales
At baseline and at 8 weeks post-intervention
Insomnia Severity Index
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention. both scores are reported
Measure of sleep problems Units of measurement: scores on a scale Abbreviation ISI Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 28 Higher score is a worse outcome Total score used, not sub scales
Assessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention. both scores are reported

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Allen Peter, Anglia Ruskin University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 22, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 26, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

January 28, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 14, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 24, 2021

Last Verified

July 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Tinnitus

Clinical Trials on CBT-based internet-intervention for tinnitus

3
Subscribe