First-In-Human Study to Evaluate Safety, Tolerability, and PK of Intravenous ATB200 Alone and When Co-Administered With Oral AT2221

October 8, 2025 updated by: Amicus Therapeutics

An Open-Label, Fixed-Sequence, Ascending-Dose, First-in-Human Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Efficacy of Intravenous Infusions of ATB200 Co-Administered With Oral AT2221 in Adult Subjects With Pompe Disease

This is an international, multi-center, open-label study designed to evaluate if the co-administration of investigational new drugs ATB200 and AT2221 is safe in adults with Pompe disease.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This is an open-label, fixed-sequence, ascending-dose, first-in-human study to evaluate the effect of a highly targeted rhGAA (ATB200) co-administered with an enzyme stabilizer (AT2221).

The study aims to evaluate safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), efficacy, pharmacodynamics (PD), and immunogenicity of ATB200 co-administered with AT2221.

Stage 1: evaluation of safety, tolerability, and PK following sequential single ascending doses of intravenously infused ATB200

Stage 2: evaluation of safety, tolerability, and PK following single- and multiple-ascending dose combinations of ATB200 and AT2221

Stage 3: evaluation of long term safety, tolerability, and efficacy following 24 month treatment of ATB200 co-administered with AT2221

Stage 4: open-label extension period with functional assessments every 6 months

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

29

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • South Australia
      • North Adelaide, South Australia, Australia, 05006
        • Womens & Childrens Hospital, Adelaide
      • Bochum, Germany, 44791
        • University Children's Hospital Department of Neuropediatrics and Inborn Metabolic Disorders, St. Josefs-Hospital
      • Munich, Germany, 80336
        • Friedrich-Baur-Institure, Dep of Neurology - University Munich
      • Rotterdam, Netherlands
        • Erasmus Medical Center
      • Auckland, New Zealand, 01051
        • School of Medicine, University of Auckland
      • Birmingham, United Kingdom, B15 2TH
        • University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Medical Center
      • Salford, United Kingdom, M6 8HD
        • Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust
    • Arizona
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85028
        • Neuromuscular Research Centre
    • California
      • Orange, California, United States, 92868
        • University of California Irvine
    • Florida
      • Gainesville, Florida, United States, 32610
        • University of Florida
    • Georgia
      • Decatur, Georgia, United States, 30033
        • Emory University Division of Medical Genetics
    • Michigan
      • Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States, 49525
        • Infusion Associates
    • Montana
      • Great Falls, Montana, United States, 59405
        • Great Falls Clinic, LLP
    • New Jersey
      • Newark, New Jersey, United States, 08103
        • Rutgers New Jersey Medical School
    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
        • Duke University Medical Center
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
        • Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15213
        • University of Pittsburgh
      • West Chester, Pennsylvania, United States, 19380
        • Abramson Cancer Center Chester County Hospital
    • Virginia
      • Fairfax, Virginia, United States, 22030
        • Lysosomal & Rare Disorders Research & Treatment Center (LDRTC)

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 71 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Adults with Diagnosis of Pompe disease

Cohort 1: Enzyme Replacement Therapy (ERT)-experienced subject (ambulatory):

  • Male and female subjects between 18 and 65 years of age, inclusive
  • Received ERT with alglucosidase alfa (Myozyme/Lumizyme) for the previous 2-6 years, inclusive
  • Was receiving alglucosidase alfa at a frequency of once every other week
  • Must have been able to walk 200-500 meters on the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT)
  • Had upright Forced Vial Capacity (FVC) 30-80% of predicted normal value

Cohort 2: ERT-experienced subjects (non-ambulatory):

  • Male and female subjects between 18 and 65 years of age, inclusive
  • Had been receiving ERT with alglucosidase alfa for ≥2 years at a regular or set frequency
  • Was wheelchair-bound

Cohort 3: ERT-naïve subjects (ambulatory):

  • Male and female subjects between 18 and 65 years of age, inclusive
  • Must have been able to walk 200-500 meters on the 6MWT
  • Had upright FVC 30-80% of predicted normal value

Cohort 4: ERT-experienced subject (ambulatory):

  • Male and female subjects between 18 and 75 years of age, inclusive
  • Had been receiving ERT with alglucosidase alfa for ≥7 years, inclusive
  • Was receiving alglucosidase alfa at a frequency of once every other week
  • Must have been able to walk 75-600 meters on the 6MWT
  • Had upright FVC 30-85% of predicted normal value

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Received treatment with prohibited medications within 30 days of Baseline Visit
  • Subject, if female, was pregnant or breastfeeding at screening
  • Subject, whether male or female, planned to conceive a child during the study
  • Had a medical or any other extenuating condition or circumstance that may, in opinion of investigator, pose an undue safety risk to the subject or compromise his/her ability to comply with protocol requirements
  • Had a history of allergy or sensitivity to alglucosidase alfa, miglustat or other iminosugars (Cohorts 1, 2, and 4)
  • Required invasive ventilatory support, or used noninvasive ventilatory support ≥ 6 hours a day while awake (Cohorts 1, 3, and 4)
  • Had active systemic autoimmune disease such as lupus, scleroderma, or rheumatoid arthritis; subjects with autoimmune disease must have been discussed with the Amicus Medical Monitor
  • Had active bronchial asthma; subjects with bronchial asthma must have been discussed with the Amicus Medical Monitor

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: ATB200
Sequential single ascending doses of intravenously infused ATB200 for 3 dosing periods
Other Names:
  • Cipaglucosidase alfa
Experimental: ATB200 + AT2221
ATB200 co-administered with AT2221 (Miglustat)
Other Names:
  • Miglustat
Other Names:
  • Cipaglucosidase alfa

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs), and Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation of Study Drug
Time Frame: Stage 3 (2 year treatment) and Stage 4 (Extension) combined, (mean = 71 months on treatment)
Number of subjects with TEAE, TESAE, and AE leading to discontinuation during the 2 year treatment period and extension (Stage 3 and 4 combined)
Stage 3 (2 year treatment) and Stage 4 (Extension) combined, (mean = 71 months on treatment)
Plasma Human Acid α-glucosidase (GAA) Activity Levels as Measured by Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax).
Time Frame: 18 Weeks
Plasma GAA levels (Cmax) measured in Cohorts 1 and 3 following 1st and 3rd doses of cipaglucosidase alfa + miglustat
18 Weeks
Plasma GAA Activity Levels as Measured by Time to Reach the Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax).
Time Frame: 18 Weeks
Plasma GAA levels (Tmax) measured in Cohorts 1 and 3 following 1st and 3rd doses of cipaglucosidase alfa + miglustat
18 Weeks
Plasma GAA Activity Levels as Measured by Area Under the Plasma Drug Concentration-time Curve (AUC).
Time Frame: 18 Weeks
Plasma GAA levels (AUC) measured in Cohorts 1 and 3 following 1st and 3rd doses of cipaglucosidase alfa + miglustat
18 Weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in 6-minute Walk Distance (6MWD)
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 60
Motor function was measured in ambulatory subjects using 6MWD (meters).
Baseline, Month 60
Change From Baseline in Pulmonary Function Tests
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 60
Pulmonary function was measured by sitting and supine % predicted forced vital capacity (FVC)
Baseline, Month 60
Change From Baseline in Muscle Strength Tests
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 60
Muscle strength was measured by total manual muscle test (MMT) score. Total MMT score ranges from 0 to 80 based on all 16 muscle groups, which are right/left shoulder abduction, right/left shoulder adduction, right/left elbow flexion, right/left elbow extension, right/left hip flexion, right/left hip abduction, right/left knee flexion, and right/left knee extension. Higher scores indicate less disease impact on muscle functions.
Baseline, Month 60
Change From Baseline in Fatigue Severity Score (FSS)
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 60
The Fatigue Severity Score (FSS) consists of 9 questions, each scored on a scale from 1 ("completely disagree") to 7 ("completely agree"). The total score ranges from 9 to 63, with higher values representing higher level of fatigue due to the disease condition.
Baseline, Month 60
Change From Baseline in Overall Physical Wellbeing (Subject's Global Impression of Change [SGIC], Question1)
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 60
The Subject's Global Impression of Change overall physical wellbeing (question 1) is scored on a 7-point rating scale. Improved = response of 5 or higher, No change = response of 4, and Declined = response of 3 or lower.
Baseline, Month 60
Change From Baseline in Overall Physical Wellbeing (Physician's Global Impression of Change [PGIC])
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 60
The Physician's Global Impression of Change overall physical wellbeing is scored on a 7-point rating scale. Improved = response of 5 or higher, No change = response of 4, and Declined = response of 3 or lower.
Baseline, Month 60

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 22, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

August 22, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 26, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 3, 2016

First Posted (Estimated)

February 5, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

October 23, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 8, 2025

Last Verified

October 1, 2025

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pompe Disease

Clinical Trials on AT2221

Subscribe