A Study to Assess the Long-term Safety and Efficacy of ATB200/AT2221 in Adult Subjects With Late-Onset Pompe Disease (LOPD)

March 2, 2026 updated by: Amicus Therapeutics

A Phase 3 Open-label Extension Study to Assess the Long-term Safety and Efficacy of Intravenous ATB200 Co-administered With Oral AT2221 in Adult Subjects With Late-onset Pompe Disease (LOPD)

This is a multicenter, international open-label extension study of ATB200/AT2221 in adult subjects with late-onset Pompe disease (LOPD) who completed Study ATB200-03.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This is an open-label extension study for subjects who completed the ATB200-03 study. The subjects will stay in this study until regulatory approval or marketing authorization and/or commercialization in the participating subject's country.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

119

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Buenos Aires, Argentina, B1629ODT
        • Hospital Universitario Austral
    • New South Wales
      • Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
        • Westmead Hospital
    • Queensland
      • Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, 4029
        • Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital
    • South Australia
      • Adelaide, South Australia, Australia, 5000
        • Royal Adelaide Hospital
    • Victoria
      • Clayton, Victoria, Australia, 3168
        • Monash Medical Centre
      • Innsbruck, Austria, A-6020
        • Medizinische Universitat Innsbruck
      • Leuven, Belgium, 3000
        • UZ Leuven
    • The Republic of Srpska
      • Banja Luka, The Republic of Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina, 78000
        • University Clinical Centre of the Republic of Srpska
    • Alberta
      • Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T3B 6A8
        • Alberta Children's Hospital, Heritage Medical Research Clinic
    • Ontario
      • Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8N 3Z5
        • McMaster University Medical Centre
      • Aarhus, Denmark
        • Aarhus Universitetshospital
      • Bron, France, 69577
        • Hôpital Pierre Wertheimer
      • Garches, France, 92380
        • Hopital Raymond Poincare
      • Lille, France, 59037
        • Hôpital Salengro
      • Marseille, France, 13385
        • Hopital de la Timone
      • Nice, France, 06001
        • Hopital Pasteur 2
      • Bonn, Germany, 53127
        • Universitätsklinikum Bonn
      • München, Germany, 80336
        • Friedrich-Baur Institut
      • Münster, Germany, 48149
        • Universitatsklinikum Munster
      • Athens, Greece, 11528
        • Eginition Hospital
      • Budapest, Hungary, 1085
        • Semmelweis University
      • Pécs, Hungary, 7623
        • University of Pecs
      • Szeged, Hungary, 6725
        • University of Szeged
      • Messina, Italy, 98124
        • UOC di Neurologia e Malattie Neuromuscolari
      • Napoli, Italy, 80131
        • Universitaria Federico II
      • Fukuoka, Japan, 814-0180
        • Fukuoka University Hospital
      • Kagashima, Japan, 890-8520
        • Kagoshima University Hospital
      • Osaka, Japan, 594 0073
        • Izumi City General Hospital
      • Sapporo, Japan, 060 8648
        • Hokkaido University Hospital
      • Tokyo, Japan, 105-8471
        • The Jikei University Hospital
      • Rotterdam, Netherlands, 3015 GD
        • Erasmus MC
      • Auckland, New Zealand, 1142
        • University of Auckland
    • Podkarpackie Voivodeship
      • Rzeszów, Podkarpackie Voivodeship, Poland, 35-326
        • Centrum Medyczne MEDYK
      • Ljubljana, Slovenia, 1000
        • University Medical Centre Ljubljana
    • Gyeongsangnam-do
      • Yangsan, Gyeongsangnam-do, South Korea, 50612
        • Pusan National University
      • Barcelona, Spain
        • Hospital De La Santa Creu I Sant Pau
      • Gothenburg, Sweden, 41345
        • Sahlgrenska University Hospital
      • Taipei, Taiwan, 100
        • National Taiwan University Hospital
      • Birmingham, United Kingdom, B15 2TH
        • Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham
      • Cambridge, United Kingdom, CB2 0QQ
        • Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
      • London, United Kingdom, NW3 2QG
        • Royal Free Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
      • Salford, United Kingdom, M6 8HD
        • Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust
    • Arkansas
      • Little Rock, Arkansas, United States, 72205
        • University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
    • California
      • Irvine, California, United States, 92868
        • University of California, Irvine
    • Florida
      • Gainesville, Florida, United States, 32610
        • University of Florida Clinical Research Center
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30322
        • Emory Clinic
    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46202
        • IU Health Neuroscience Center
    • Missouri
      • St Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
        • Washington University School of Medicine
    • Montana
      • Billings, Montana, United States, 59101
        • Billings Clinic
    • New Jersey
      • Hackensack, New Jersey, United States, 07061
        • Hackensack University Medical Center
    • New York
      • Great Neck, New York, United States, 11021
        • Northwell Health
      • New York, New York, United States, 10017
        • NYU School of Medicine
    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
        • Duke University Medical Center
    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45229
        • Cincinnati Children's Hospital
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45219
        • University of Cincinnati Gardner Neuroscience Institute
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43210
        • The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
        • University of Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15213
        • UPMC Montefiore Clinical and Translational Research Center
    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84108
        • University of Utah
    • Virginia
      • Fairfax, Virginia, United States, 22030
        • Lysosomal and Rare Disorders Research and Treatment Center, Inc.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Subject must have completed Study ATB200-03.

Note: Subjects who were forced to withdraw from Study ATB200-03 for a logistical reason not related to the efficacy or safety of cipaglucosidase alfa/miglustat (eg, hospitalization for a car accident, COVID-19 pandemic, or emergency surgery) that resulted in several consecutive missed doses may have been eligible to participate in this study upon approval by the Amicus medical monitor.

Exclusion Criteria

  1. Subject plans to receive gene therapy or participate in another interventional study for Pompe disease.
  2. Subject, if female, is pregnant or breastfeeding.
  3. Subject, whether male or female, is planning to conceive a child during the study.
  4. Subject had a hypersensitivity to any of the excipients in cipaglucosidase alfa or miglustat, or had a medical condition or any other extenuating circumstance that may have, in the opinion of the investigator or medical monitor, posed an undue safety risk to the subject or may have compromised his/her ability to comply with or adversely impacted protocol requirements.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: ATB200/AT2221
Participants received ATB200 (cipaglucosidase alfa) co-administered with AT2221 capsule (miglustat)
Enzyme Replacement Therapy via intravenous infusion
Other Names:
  • cipaglucosidase alfa
Participants received ATB200 co-administered with AT2221 (miglustat)
Other Names:
  • miglustat

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs), and TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation of Study Drug
Time Frame: Entire extension study (mean = 40.5 months on treatment)
Number of subjects with TEAE, TESAE, and TEAE leading to discontinuation during this long-term extension study
Entire extension study (mean = 40.5 months on treatment)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in 6-Minute Walk Distance (6MWD)
Time Frame: baseline, Week 208
Motor function was measured using the 6-minute walk distance (meters)
baseline, Week 208
Change From Baseline in Sitting % Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)
Time Frame: baseline, Week 208
Pulmonary function was measured by sitting % predicted forced vital capacity (FVC)
baseline, Week 208
Change From Baseline in Manual Muscle Testing (MMT) Lower Extremity Score
Time Frame: baseline, Week 208
Strength was measured by manual muscle testing (MMT) using the Medical Research Council grading scale (0 to 5 points, with 5 indicating normal function). Change from baseline values >0 represent improvement.
baseline, Week 208
Change From Baseline in the Total Score for Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) - Physical Function
Time Frame: baseline, Week 208
Physical Function Short Form 20a (v2.0) consisted of 20 questions. The first 14 questions were each scored on a scale from 1 to 5 as follows: 1 = unable to do; 2 = with much difficulty; 3 = with some difficulty; 4 = with a little difficulty; 5 = without any difficulty; the next 6 questions were each scored on a scale from 1 to 5 as follows: 1 = cannot do; 2 = quite a lot; 3 = somewhat; 4 = very little; 5 = not at all. The total score was calculated by summing up scores (1 to 5) across all items. Total scores range from 20 to 100. A higher score represented a better outcome.
baseline, Week 208
Change From Baseline in Gait, Stairs, Gower, Chair (GSGC) Test
Time Frame: baseline, Week 208
The GSGC consisted of a 10-meter walk for evaluation of gait, a 4-stair climb, Gowers' maneuver, and arising from a chair. Results of the GSGC included the time required to complete the individual tests, individual scores for each of the tests (1 to 7 points for each of gait, 4-stair climb, and Gowers' maneuver, and 1 to 6 points for arising from a chair), and a total score. GSGC total score was the sum of the component scores from the 4 functional tests. The total score ranged from a minimum of 4 points (normal performance) to a maximum of 27 points (worst performance).
baseline, Week 208
Change From Baseline in Overall Physical Well-being (Subject's Global Impression of Change [SGIC], Question 1)
Time Frame: baseline, Week 208
The Subject's Global Impression of Change overall physical well-being (question 1) is scored on a 7-point rating scale ranging from "very much worse" to "very much improved."
baseline, Week 208
Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Overall Status
Time Frame: baseline, Week 208
The Physician's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) is designed to record the physician's assessment of the subject's status, taking into account the subject's signs and symptoms and other neuromuscular symptoms, and signs relative to their status at the Baseline Visit. The PGIC is based on a single item that is scored on a 7-point rating scale ranging from 1 "very much worse" to 7 "very much improved."
baseline, Week 208
Percent Change From Baseline in Creatine Kinase (U/L)
Time Frame: baseline, Week 208
Percent change from baseline to Week 208 in the levels of biomarker creatine kinase (CK)
baseline, Week 208
Percent Change From Baseline in Urine Hex4 (mmol/Mol Creatinine)
Time Frame: baseline, Week 208
Percent change from baseline to Week 208 in the levels of biomarker urine Hex4.
baseline, Week 208
Proportion of Subjects With Positive Anti-drug Antibodies at Baseline and Week 208
Time Frame: baseline, Week 208
Immunogenicity was assessed by the number (%) of subjects with positive specific anti-cipaglucosidase antibodies at baseline and at Week 208
baseline, Week 208
Change From Baseline in the Total Score for PROMIS® - Fatigue
Time Frame: baseline, Week 208
Fatigue Short Form 8a consisted of 6 questions, each scored on a scale from 1 to 5 as follows: 1 = not at all; 2 = a little bit; 3 = somewhat; 4 = quite a bit; 5 = very much; and 2 questions, each scored on a scale from 1 to 5 as follows: 1 = never; 2 = rarely; 3 = sometimes; 4 = often; 5 = always. The total score was calculated by summing up scores (1 to 5) across all items resulting in a total score range from 6 (minimum) to 30 (maximum). A lower score represented lower fatigue symptoms.
baseline, Week 208
Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimensions 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Responses
Time Frame: baseline, Week 208

The EuroQol 5 Dimensions 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire comprises 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: Level 1=no problems, Level 2=slight problems, Level 3=moderate problems, Level 4=severe problems, and Level 5=extreme problems. In this categorical assessment, subjects were asked to indicate their health state by ticking the box next to the most appropriate statement in each of the 5 dimensions.

Outcomes for change from baseline at Week 208 include 'no change', 'worsening' relative to baseline category, or 'improvement' relative to baseline category. Changes (worsening or improvement) are shown by magnitude of change (how many Levels) in each categorical assessment.

baseline, Week 208

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 18, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 18, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 22, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

October 24, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 5, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 2, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pompe Disease (Late-onset)

Clinical Trials on ATB200

Subscribe